Nach Genre filtern
Beyond The Judgement
While national courts often dominate headlines, many everyday decisions that shape our communities are made by state judges. Beyond The Judgement dives deep into the lives and perspectives of judges and justices from local courts across the country. Through interviews, we uncover the stories, values, and challenges of those who are making important decisions. These interviews are supplemented by conversations with law professors who dive into the effects of state court decisions. Taken together, we hope to understand who and what is truly beyond the judgement.
- 88 - 12. Judge Andrea Wolfson (Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida)
Happy Monday, everybody! On today's episode, Eva chatted with Judge Andrea Wolfson of Florida's Eleventh Circuit. We had a wonderful conversation about Judge Wolfson's long tenure in criminal law, as well as her insights about the challenges approaching the legal field today. We hope you enjoy this episode and see you soon for another :)
Mon, 18 May 2026 - 44min - 87 - 11. Judge Amy Eddy (Montana Supreme Court Hopeful)
On today's episode, Pari spoke with Judge Amy Eddy who is running for Montana Supreme Court. You can learn more about her and her campaign here: https://amyeddyforjustice.com/. Thank you so much!
Mon, 06 Apr 2026 - 32min - 86 - 11. Judge Lisa WalshMon, 23 Mar 2026 - 33min
- 85 - 10. Judge HoughtonMon, 16 Feb 2026 - 45min
- 84 - 09. Judge Sara Doyle (GA Court of Appeals)Mon, 02 Feb 2026 - 32min
- 83 - 08. Judge Chris McFadden (GA Court of Appeals)Mon, 12 Jan 2026 - 38min
- 82 - 07. Judge Toby HampsonMon, 03 Nov 2025 - 35min
- 81 - 06. Judge Chris BrookMon, 20 Oct 2025 - 47min
- 80 - 05. Judge Allegra Collins
Happy Monday! On today’s episode, Eva chatted with Judge Allegra Collins of the NC Court of Appeals. We talked about her journey to bench, advice for aspiring lawyers, experience as a world class athlete, and decision not to run for reelection in 2026. We had a fantastic time talking and hope you enjoy this episode. Judge Collins is active on LinkedIn, so visit her page here to learn more.
Mon, 06 Oct 2025 - 27min - 79 - 04. Justice Robin HudsonMon, 22 Sep 2025 - 43min
- 78 - 03. Chief Judge Chris DillonMon, 08 Sep 2025 - 44min
- 77 - 02. Judge Christine Walczyk
Hey y'all!
On today's episode Pari spoke with Judge Christine Walczyk who has been a district court judge for over 18 years and is now running for the NC Court of Appeals. You can learn more about her and her campaign here:https://www.judgechristine.org/. We are so grateful and honored to have had her on!
Mon, 25 Aug 2025 - 30min - 76 - 01. NC Supreme Court Justice Anita Earls
Hey y'all! On the first episode of Beyond the Judgement we had the honor of speaking with NC Supreme Court Justice Anita Earls. Justice Earls is running for re-election in 2026 and you can learn more about her and her campaign here: https://earls4justice.com/. Stay tuned for our next episode in 2 weeks!
Mon, 11 Aug 2025 - 50min - 75 - Trailer - Welcome to Beyond the Judgement!
Hey y'all!
We are so excited to announce a new chapter of "Tiers of Scrutiny." We cannot wait to speak with judges and justices across the country about why they do what they do and how. If you're interested in joining us as a speaker please email us at tiersofscrutiny@gmail.com. See you next week for our first episode!
- Eva and Pari
Mon, 04 Aug 2025 - 01min - 74 - Executing Justice? (Glossip v. Oklahoma)
On today's episode Eva and I discuss Glossip v. Oklahoma. You can read more about the facts of the case here: https://www.oyez.org/cases/2024/22-7466 .
Here are the resources we used for this episode:
- https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/22-7466_5h25.pdf
Mon, 07 Jul 2025 - 18min - 73 - US v. Skrmetti: SCOTUS Upholds Ban on Gender-Affirming Care for Minors
In this episode, Pari and I break down the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in United States v. Skrmetti, where the Court upheld Tennessee’s ban on gender-affirming medical care for minors. We chat about the majority’s rationale, the fierce dissent, various concurrences, and what this ruling might mean for the future of LGBTQ+ rights. We also discuss how Skrmetti fits into the broader post-Dobbs judicial landscape. Additional analysis on the case can be found in the "Gender-Affirming Care (US v. Skrmetti)" episode released on March 10th. As usual, our sources are listed below.
If interested, ACLU-NC, GSA Network, Human Rights Campaign, and Rainbow Collective for Change are hosting a virtual town hall discussing this SCOTUS decision TODAY (Monday, June 23rd at 6 PM EST)!
Sources:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/23-477_2cp3.pdf
https://www.hrc.org/resources/attacks-on-gender-affirming-care-by-state-map
https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/case-files/united-states-v-skrmetti/
Mon, 23 Jun 2025 - 27min - 72 - Racial Gerrymandering, Revisited: Louisiana v. Callais
On today's episode of Tiers of Scrutiny, Pari and I discuss Louisiana v. Callais, a case that the Supreme Court heard arguments for in late March. After a federal court ordered Louisiana to fix a Voting Rights Act violation, the new map—drawn to empower Black voters—sparked backlash from non-Black plaintiffs claiming racial gerrymandering. When, if ever, is racial gerrymandering a legitimate remedy? What does this mean for the future of the VRA? We discuss these questions and more in this episode. As always, sources below.
https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/louisiana-v-callais/
https://www.oyez.org/cases/2024/24-109
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24-109/335630/20241219161939870_24-109%20Brief-updated.pdf
Mon, 02 Jun 2025 - 11min - 71 - Opt-Out or Opt-In? Faith, Freedom & the First Grade (Mahmoud v. Taylor)
In this episode, we dive into one of the most talked-about education and religious liberty cases of this term: Mahmoud v. Taylor. At the heart of the case? A Maryland school district's decision to include LGBTQ-inclusive storybooks in the elementary curriculum—and to eliminate the opt-out policy that once allowed parents to excuse their children from these lessons on religious grounds.
We explore the constitutional questions raised by Muslim, Catholic, and Orthodox Christian families who say their religious rights were sidelined, and the school district’s rationale that maintaining opt-outs was unworkable and potentially stigmatizing. What does the First Amendment really protect when it comes to public education, religious upbringing, and curriculum decisions? Tune in as we unpack the legal arguments, the court’s reasoning, and what this case could mean for schools and families across the country.
Here are our sources:
- https://www.oyez.org/cases/2024/24-297
- https://www.oyez.org/cases/2024/24-297
- https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/mahmoud-v-taylor/
Mon, 28 Apr 2025 - 16min - 70 - Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos
Welcome back to Tiers of Scrutiny! This week, Pari and I discussed Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos--a case where the Mexican government takes American gun companies to court.
Some relevant resources:
https://www.oyez.org/cases/2024/23-1141
https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/smith-wesson-brands-inc-v-estados-unidos-mexicanos/
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-1141/332815/20241126130359423_23-1141%20ts.pdf
Mon, 21 Apr 2025 - 10min - 69 - Oklahoma State Charter School Board v. Drummond
Hi everyone! On today's ToS episode, Pari and I discuss Oklahoma State Charter School Board v. Drummond. This case raises various questions about the First Amendment's relationship to state-funded religious schools. Is it possible that the Free Exercise Clause prohibits states from excluding religious schools from charter-school programs? Alternatively, does the Establishment Clause require states to exclude these schools? We chat about these questions, as well as a few others here. As always, resources are listed below--thank you for tuning and we'll see you in two weeks!
https://www.oyez.org/cases/2024/24-394
https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-1/
Mon, 31 Mar 2025 - 14min - 68 - Gender-Affirming Care (US v. Skrmetti)
Hey y'all! On today's episode Eva and I discuss US v. Skrmetti. Here are the resources we used:
- https://www.hrc.org/resources/attacks-on-gender-affirming-care-by-state-map
- https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/fullarticle/2793977
- https://www.oyez.org/cases/2019/17-1618
- https://www.oyez.org/cases/2024/23-477
- https://www.capitol.tn.gov/Bills/113/Bill/SB0001.pdf
- https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/united-states-v-skrmetti/
- https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-477/300984/20240220190248213_23-477%20United%20States%20v.%20Skrmetti%20-%20final.pdf
- https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-477/299674/20240202161645864_23-466%20-477%20Brief%20in%20Opposition%20Final.pdf
Mon, 10 Mar 2025 - 15min - 67 - Barnes v. Felix: Defining Limits on Police Force
On today’s episode of Tiers of Scrutiny, Pari and I discuss Barnes v. Felix, a case concerning the “moment of threat doctrine”--a legal principle limiting review of police officers’ use of force to only the “moment of threat” in which they perceived a threat. Opponents of the doctrine call for an evaluation of “totality of circumstances”--arguing that courts must review any and all actions leading up to the moment of threat.
Barnes v. Felix is named for Ashtian Barnes, a Black man who was shot and killed by a law enforcement officer during a traffic stop in 2016.
Listed below are relevant resources:
https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/barnes-v-felix/
https://www.theusconstitution.org/litigation/barnes-v-felix/
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/471/1/
Mon, 24 Feb 2025 - 09min - 66 - Clouds of Confusion: Vapes vs. FDA Rules (FDA v. Wages and White Lion Investments)
In this episode, we dive into the legal battle between e-cigarette manufacturers and the FDA—a case that’s making waves all the way to the Supreme Court. Back in 2009, Congress put vaping under FDA oversight, but fast forward to 2021, and manufacturers claim the agency pulled a last-minute rule change, shutting down their applications without warning. The FDA says it’s just doing its job to protect public health—especially kids. So, did the agency play fair, or did it pull a “regulatory switcheroo,” as the Fifth Circuit called it? We break down the arguments, the legal implications, and what this case means for government transparency, corporate accountability, and the future of flavored vapes.
Tune in as we unpack the puffs, politics, and procedures behind this high-stakes case!
Here are our sources:
https://www.oyez.org/cases/2024/23-1038
https://www.scotusblog.com/2024/12/justices-hear-fda-case-on-flavored-vapes/https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-1038/323413/20240826164114741_23-1038tsFDA.pdf
https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/what-we-do
Mon, 10 Feb 2025 - 09min - 65 - Privacy, Porn, and the First Amendment: A Constitutional Crossroads (Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Paxton)
Happy Monday, folks! On today's episode, Pari and I discuss Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, a case in which SCOTUS must decide the correct scrutiny test to apply to age verification laws on porn sites. Other questions we touch on...Should governments be able to require that porn websites verify viewers' ages? Do such laws infringe on First Amendment protections and anonymity?
This is a case that will have significant implications for free speech protections regarding sexual/obscene content. We recorded this episode before the Supreme Court heard arguments in this case, so we've linked the January 15th arguments for you below--alongside a host of resources if you're interested in learning more.
See you in two weeks!
Eva & Pari
https://www.oyez.org/cases/2024/23-1122
https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/free-speech-coalition-inc-v-paxton/
https://www.aclu.org/cases/free-speech-coalition-inc-v-paxton
https://www.freespeechcoalition.com/
Mon, 27 Jan 2025 - 11min - 64 - Republic of Hungary v. Simon
Hello listeners! In this episode, Pari and I discuss Republic of Hungary v. Simon, a SCOTUS case that concerns Hungarian Holocaust survivors suing the Republic of Hungary in pursuit of compensation for seized property. Pari was actually lucky enough to be present in the chamber during oral arguments for this case! Listen for her observations about the justices' statures, behaviors and body languages during arguments, and more. As always, we've linked some information for you below and we'll see you in two weeks!
https://www.scotusblog.com/2020/12/case-preview-foreign-sovereign-immunity-comity-and-the-holocaust/
https://www.oyez.org/cases/2024/23-867
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-867/323352/20240826122931272_23-867%20Petitioners%20Opening%20Brief.pdf
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-867/324002/20240903185425980_23-867tsacUnitedStates.pdf
https://tlblog.org/hungary-v-simon-offers-supreme-court-stark-choice/
Mon, 13 Jan 2025 - 16min - 63 - Tik Tok on Trial: A Conversation About Tik Tok v. Garland
Hey y'all!
On today's episode Eva and I discuss the SCOTUS case about the Tik Tok ban. Here are the sources we used:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24-656/336144/20241227161148472_24-656tsGovt_final.pdfhttps://www.npr.org/2024/05/14/1251086753/tiktok-ban-first-amendment-lawsuit-free-speech-project-texas
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24-656/336136/20241227160309446_24-656%20ts.pdf
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/supreme-court-tiktok-ban-law/
Mon, 30 Dec 2024 - 24min - 62 - Sentenced to Death by Deception (Glossip v. Oklahoma)
In today's episode, Eva and I discuss Glossip v. Oklahoma. The case is about Richard Glossip who has been sentenced to the death penalty despite the prosecution hiding information about a key witness' mental health and that same witness admitting that he lied on the stand. We dive into the ethical implications of what will happen if the Supreme Court decides to uphold Glossip's sentence. Here are the sources we used:
- https://www.oyez.org/cases/2024/22-7466
- https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22-7466/308603/20240429163200162_22-7466%20ts.pdf
- https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/facts-and-research/clemency
- https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/373/83/
- https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/brady_rule
- https://www.oyez.org/cases/2014/14-7955
Mon, 16 Dec 2024 - 18min - 61 - Who Gets to Define the Word "Firearm"? (Garland v. VanDerStok)
In this episode, we delve into the Supreme Court case that challenges the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (ATF) 2022 revisions to the Gun Control Act of 1986. These revisions introduced new definitions of key terms like "firearm," "firearm frame," and "receiver" that could have far-reaching implications for gun regulations across the country. The case revolves around whether the ATF has overstepped its authority by redefining these terms and altering the legal landscape for gun owners, manufacturers, and regulators. Join us as we break down the legal arguments, the historical context of the Gun Control Act, and the potential consequences of this case for the future of firearms law.
Here are the sources we used:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-852/315742/20240625172334020_23-852%20VanDerStok.pdf
https://www.oyez.org/cases/2024/23-852
https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/audio/2024/23-852
Tue, 10 Dec 2024 - 12min - 60 - Can SCOTUS make up its mind on gun laws? (Update: U.S. v. Rahimi)
Hello everybody! We are on to business as usual, updating you on U.S. v. Rahimi. This is a case about the permissibility of 2nd amendment restrictions. If you need additional background, we recommend you go back and listen to the original U.S. v. Rahimi episode, as well as the NY State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen episode. Linked below are some resources on the Rahimi case for your viewing! Thanks for tuning in.
As for the NC Supreme Court race, Justice Allison Riggs appears to have won by a slim 625 votes. There will likely be a recount. If you want to learn more about her, we recommend that you go back and listen to our interview with her, entitled "Campaigning with Conviction".
https://www.oyez.org/cases/2023/22-915
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-915_8o6b.pdf
https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-guns-domestic-violence-d63ee828e51911cc5e5a01780820f224
Wed, 20 Nov 2024 - 15min - 59 - Election Day Emergencies: 3 SCOTUS Decisions About the 2024 Election
Hey y'all!
On today's episode Eva and I discuss 3 key decisions that the Supreme Court made about the upcoming election. If you have not made a plan to vote yet visit iwillvote.com to get all the information you need to vote tomorrow. Here are all the resources we used in compiling this episode:
- https://www.npr.org/2024/11/01/g-s1-31054/supreme-court-pennsylvania
- https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/10/30/virginia-voter-purge-justices/
- https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/noncitizen-voting-missing-millions
- https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4960129-election-lawsuits-supreme-court/
Mon, 04 Nov 2024 - 10min - 58 - Censoring the Censors: Moody v. Net Choice
In today's episode Eva and I discuss Moody v. Net Choice. The case is about social media and whether or not states can impose regulations on whether social media platforms can engage in censorship.
Here are the resources we used:
- https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-277_d18f.pdf
- https://www.oyez.org/cases/2023/22-555
https://www.scotusblog.com/2024/07/court-sends-social-media-moderation-cases-back-to-lower-courts/Mon, 21 Oct 2024 - 11min - 57 - Abortions & Emergency Procedures: Moyle v. United States
Hey y'all! On today's episode, Eva and I discuss Moyle v. United States. Here are the resources we used:
https://www.oyez.org/cases/2023/23-726
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-726_6jgm.pdf
https://www.lwv.org/legal-center/united-states-v-idaho-consolidated-moyle-v-united-states
Mon, 07 Oct 2024 - 07min - 56 - Intent vs. Impact: Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP
Hi everyone! On today's episode of Tiers of Scrutiny, we discuss Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP.
Here are the sources we used:
- https://www.oyez.org/cases/2023/22-807
- https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-807_3e04.pdf
- https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/court-cases/rucho-v-common-cause
Mon, 23 Sep 2024 - 11min - 55 - Immunity or King-making: Trump v. U.S.
On today's episode, Pari and I discuss the landmark case regarding presidents' immunity from criminal prosecution for official acts. As always, thanks for tuning in!
Additional resources:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf
https://www.oyez.org/cases/2023/23-939
Tue, 10 Sep 2024 - 13min - 54 - Was George Orwell Onto Something? (Murthy v. Missouri Update)
On today's episode, we discuss Murthy v. Missouri, a case regarding freedom of speech and government censorship on social media platforms.
Here are the sources we used:
https://www.oyez.org/cases/2023/23-411
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-411_3dq3.pdf
https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artIII-S2-C1-6-1/ALDE_00012992/ https://www.scotusblog.com/2024/06/justices-side-with-biden-over-governments-influence-on-social-media-content-moderation/ https://www.scotusblog.com/2024/06/justices-side-with-biden-over-governments-influence-on-social-media-content-moderation/Mon, 26 Aug 2024 - 11min - 53 - Power Struggle: What will a post-Chevron world look like? (Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo & Relentless Inc. v. Department of Commerce))
On today's episode, we discuss the fall of a judicial doctrine known as "chevron deference." in a case called Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo and Relentless, Inc. v. Department of Commerce. Here are all the sources we used:
https://www.oyez.org/cases/2023/22-451 https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/chevron_deference https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-451_7m58.pdf https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/administrative_procedure_act https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/summary-administrative-procedure-act https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/jmd/legacy/2014/05/01/act-pl79-404.pdf https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/02/climate/supreme-court-climate-chevron.html https://www.scotusblog.com/2024/06/supreme-court-strikes-down-chevron-curtailing-power-of-federal-agencies/ https://www.politico.com/news/2024/06/28/supreme-court-chevron-biden-presidents-00165234 https://www.foxnews.com/politics/supreme-court-sides-fishermen-landmark-case-deciding-fate-administrative-state https://www.oyez.org/cases/2023/22-1219Mon, 12 Aug 2024 - 16min - 52 - Can Cities Penalize Sleeping in Public? (Grants Pass v. Johnson: Update)
On today's episode, Pari and I update you on a case we've previously covered: City of Grants Pass v. Johnson. The question at hand--whether or not cities can penalize unhoused people for sleeping in public areas? We briefly preview the case, discuss the Court's decision, and give you some of our thoughts. As always, resources linked below. Thank you tuning in!
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-175_19m2.pdf
https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/city-of-grants-pass-oregon-v-johnson/
Mon, 29 Jul 2024 - 17min - 51 - Campaigning with Conviction: A Conversation With Justice Allison Riggs
On today's episode, we have an exciting interview with North Carolina Supreme Court Justice Allison Riggs. As she looks ahead to 2024 and beyond, we wanted to learn more about her background, convictions, and her vision for the future of our democracy. Listen to this episode to learn more about Justice Riggs, the NC Supreme Court, and the importance of voting in 2024. You can learn about Justice Riggs and her campaign here: https://www.riggsforourcourts.com/!
Mon, 15 Jul 2024 - 37min - 50 - What could the ACLU and NRA possibly agree on? (NRA v. Vullo: Update)
Welcome back to Tiers of Scrutiny! Listen here to learn about NRA v. Vullo, a case in which the NRA accuses New York's Department of Financial Services' Superintendent of suppressing their speech. Linked below are additional resources regarding this case.
https://www.oyez.org/cases/2023/22-842
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-842_6kg7.pdf
Mon, 24 Jun 2024 - 12min - 49 - GUILTY: discussing the infamous Trump conviction
Wondering about the nitty gritty of former President Donald Trump's conviction last week? We were too. Listen here for a discussion of Trump's actions, the charges, the trial, the verdict, and the response.
Read more here:
https://www.npr.org/2024/05/30/g-s1-1848/trump-hush-money-trial-34-counts
https://www.vox.com/politics/353111/trump-trial-verdict-criticisms-wrongly-convicted
https://time.com/6985067/donald-trump-felon-travel-guns-voting/
https://www.vox.com/scotus/353561/supreme-court-donald-trump-nullfy-conviction
Fri, 07 Jun 2024 - 27min - 48 - Who does the 8th Amendment Protect? (City of Grants Pass v. Johnson)
Hey y'all!
We hope you enjoy today's episode. You can read more about the case here:
- https://www.oyez.org/cases/2023/23-175:
-https://hls.harvard.edu/today/supreme-court-preview-city-of-grants-pass-v-johnson/
https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2023/23-175_6kh7.pdfMon, 27 May 2024 - 14min - 47 - What Qualifies as a "Presidential Duty?" (Trump v. US)
On today's episode of Tiers of Scrutiny Eva and I discuss Trump v. US, the SCOTUS case about former President Trump's immunity in the January 6th trial.
https://www.scotusblog.com/2024/02/supreme-court-takes-up-trump-immunity-appeal/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/03/06/trump-immunity-supreme-court-argument-date/
Mon, 29 Apr 2024 - 08min - 46 - Is the Clock Ticking on Tik Tok? (1st Amendment Concerns with the Tik Tok Ban)
Hey y'all!
We hope you are doing well. On today's episode Eva and I discuss the Tik Tok Ban which was passed by the House of Representatives on March 13th. Here are the sources we used for the episode:
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/15/technology/tiktok-ban-bill-senate.html
https://time.com/6958140/tiktok-ban-jeff-jackson-vote-apology/https://apnews.com/article/florida-social-media-ban-desantis-fd07f61e167bd9109a83cd7355b5f164
Mon, 15 Apr 2024 - 16min - 45 - Can Texas Take Immigration Matters Into Its Own Hands? (SB4 and the Conflicting Rulings on the Bill)
On today's episode, Eva and I cover Texas v. United States (2024). This case regards SB4 (an immigration law) and Article 1, Section 10. Here are the sources which we used:
- https://www.oyez.org/cases/2011/11-182
-https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23a814_febh.pdf
Mon, 01 Apr 2024 - 11min - 44 - Why Colorado Can't Kick Trump Off The Ballot (Trump v. Anderson)
Tune in to hear us discuss the Supreme Court's per curial opinion in Trump v. Anderson. We also delve into Sections 3 and 5 of the 14th Amendment, as well as states' inability to remove federal office holders from elections.
Read the Court's opinion here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-719_19m2.pdf
Mon, 18 Mar 2024 - 24min - 43 - Does this count as Spotify's speech? (Netchoice v. Paxton, LLC.)
Hi everyone! On today's episode we discuss Net Choice v. Paxton, LLC. (https://www.oyez.org/cases/2023/22-555).
Here are our sources for the episode:
https://www.journaloffreespeechlaw.org/candeub2.pdf
https://www.cato.org/blog/fifth-circuit-gets-right-editorial-freedom-very-wrong
https://knightcolumbia.org/cases/netchoice
Mon, 19 Feb 2024 - 18min - 42 - Listen to this episode... or else: Coercion and Speech (NRA v. Vullo)
The episode title is a play on today's case: NRA v. Vullo. You can read more about the case here: https://www.oyez.org/cases/2023/22-842. Here are our sources for today's episode:
Mon, 05 Feb 2024 - 16min - 41 - A $340 Billion Dollar Question (Moore v. United States)
Hi everyone! On today's episode, I am covering Moore v. United States. This case involves an investment into a foreign company and a taxation on that investment. Although the case itself may seem boring, the wider implications of a decision are fascinating. You can learn more here!
Mon, 22 Jan 2024 - 07min - 40 - #HaveAConvo: When Should the Government Regulate Speech on Social Media? (Murthy v. Missouri)
Hi everyone! On today's episode, Eva and I discuss Murthy v. Missouri. The case is about the First Amendment and when, if at all, the government can step in to restrict speech on social media. You can read more about the case here: https://www.oyez.org/cases/2023/23-411! As always, please let us know if you have any comments or questions.
Mon, 08 Jan 2024 - 18min - 39 - Accountability: An Ethics Code Without a "Sword"Mon, 11 Dec 2023 - 05min
- 38 - Gun Rights, Wrongs, & Domestic Violence (US v. Rahimi)
Welcome back to Tiers of Scrutiny! On today's episode, we discuss a 2nd Amendment case--United States v. Rahimi. Check out the links below for a little extra reading on the case. See you in two weeks :)
https://www.oyez.org/cases/2023/22-915
https://www.aclu.org/cases/united-states-v-rahimi
Mon, 27 Nov 2023 - 12min - 37 - 5th Amendment Woes (McElrath v. Georgia)Mon, 06 Nov 2023 - 07min
- 36 - Sooo... what is the intersection between race and political affiliation, if any? And why does it matter when drawing maps? (Alexander v. South Carolina NAACP)Mon, 23 Oct 2023 - 10min
- 35 - What does Port Huron's city manager have to do with a finsta? (Lindke v. Freed and O'Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier)Mon, 25 Sep 2023 - 16min
- 34 - Trump Too Small? (Vidal v. Elster)Mon, 11 Sep 2023 - 09min
- 33 - Did internet stalking just get a whole lot easier? (Counterman v. Colorado)
In today's case we discuss the intersection between freedom of speech and internet stalking. You can read the court's full opinion here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/22-138_43j7.pdf!
Mon, 21 Aug 2023 - 23min - 32 - The End of Affirmative Action & The Asian-American Paradox
In this episode, we discuss the fall of affirmative action and our predictions of what will happen to college applications next. We simultaneously explored the role of Asian Americans and the model minority myth in both upholding and ending the practice. By no means do we have all the answers to the effect that the end of the policy will have on institutions and opportunities for underrepresented minorities and those in the majority. This episode is a contentious one but we didn't want to shy away from our thoughts and opinions so please be respectful when engaging in discourse. At the end of the day, people are sacred and ideas are not.
Here are the references we used:
https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w26316/w26316.pdf
https://www.axios.com/local/san-francisco/2023/07/03/affirmative-action-supreme-court-california#
https://www.npr.org/2023/07/02/1183981097/affirmative-action-asian-americans-poc
http://care.gseis.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/care-brief-raceblind.pdf
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.00284.x
http://www.jstor.org/stable/42956064
http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt7rqbv
Fisher v. University of Texas. (n.d.). Oyez. Retrieved July 7, 2023, from https://www.oyez.org/cases/2012/11-345
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/02/15/legacy-colleges-universities-black-brown/
https://www.law.com/almID/1202676210690/
Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College. (n.d.). Oyez. Retrieved July 7, 2023, from https://www.oyez.org/cases/2022/20-1199
https://thespearheadmagazine.com/how-the-model-minority-myth-affects-us-all/
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjrl/vol11/iss2/7
https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2023/06/29/affirmative-action-banned-what-happens/
Mon, 07 Aug 2023 - 31min - 31 - A Delicate Balance: Protections Against Discrimination & Free Speech (303 Creative LLC v. Elenis)
Listen to us unpack the decision in 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis, in which SCOTUS came down in favor of Lori Smith, the Colorado wedding website designer who did not wish to ever design a website for a same-sex couple. Read here for more background information. See you in two weeks!
Mon, 24 Jul 2023 - 12min - 30 - A Win For Tribal Sovereignty: Haaland v. Brackeen
Welcome back to Tiers of Scrutiny! Listen here for a breakdown of Haaland v. Brackeen, a SCOTUS case regarding ICWA (The Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978). If interested in more background information, check out the following links:
https://www.oyez.org/cases/2022/21-376
https://www.aclu.org/cases/brackeen-v-haaland
Mon, 10 Jul 2023 - 06min - 29 - The Supreme Court's Unexpected Verdict on Democracy: Allen v. Milligan
This episode of tiers of scrutiny covers the court's recent decision in Allen v. Milliganwhich regards maps used in the 2022 midterm election in Alabama. You can read the opinion here. If you are interested in more legal analysis we suggest SCOTUS Blog.
Mon, 19 Jun 2023 - 13min - 28 - Twitter & Terrorism: What responsibility do social media companies have in terrorism, if any? (Twitter v. Taamneh)
In this episode we discuss Twitter v. Taamneh and Google v. Gonzalez, two decisions released by the court on May 18th. We hope you enjoy!
Mon, 05 Jun 2023 - 12min - 27 - The Least Popular Branch: Ethics & Lack ThereofMon, 15 May 2023 - 17min
- 26 - SCOTUS to the Rescue: Mifepristone, Comstock Act, and More
On April 21st, the Supreme Court released a block on a lower court ruling from April 7th to prohibit the use of Mifepristone (an abortion pill) which contradicted another ruling on the same day which expanded the use of Mifepristone. Tune in to hear our thoughts and opinions of the block along with updates on the NC Supreme Court cases we talked about 2 episodes ago: Harper v. Hall and Holmes v. Moore.The Republican majority court has reversed these decisions which will have a major impact on how we vote in the next election.
Mon, 01 May 2023 - 10min - 25 - Clarence Thomas's Billionaire BFF
Greetings! Today's episode of Barely Legal focuses on recent news! ProPublica released a report revealing that Clarence Thomas failed to disclose multiple trips and a real estate deal made with GOP super donor and billionaire, Harlan Crow. What does this mean for the public's (already eroding) trust in the Supreme Court?
As always, thank you for listening and we'll see you in two weeks.
Mon, 17 Apr 2023 - 16min - 24 - Hurdles & Hoops: NC Supreme Court Rehears Holmes v. Moore
In today's episode, we discuss the newly Republican majority NC Supreme Court rehearing two voting-related cases, Holmes v. Moore and Harper v. Hall. The former has to do with Voter ID requirements and the latter with allegedly racially discriminatory redistricting. As always, we encourage you to seek out information about your local legislators and justices, and to bear this information in mind when you cast your vote. Thanks for listening, and we'll see you in three weeks.
Mon, 27 Mar 2023 - 11min - 23 - Dealing With Dobbs
Welcome to today's episode of Barely Legal, where we discuss the five women suing the state of Texas for not providing them with abortions despite their fetuses being unviable and their lives being at risk. We also discuss the unintended consequences of abortion bans that have sprouted across the country since the release of the Supreme Court's decision on Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, the case that overturned Roe v. Wade and returned the decision of abortion to the states.
Attached is a link to an overview of the Dobbs case. Thank you for listening.
Mon, 13 Mar 2023 - 12min - 22 - Seven ATE Nine: When is the Court's role to step in when it comes to the death penalty?
Today we talk about John Balentine and the role of our courts in determining who lives and who dies. Although this is not a Supreme Court case, there are still many implications from the decision. You can read more about it here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2023/02/supreme-court-declines-to-halt-execution-of-texas-man-who-said-juror-and-attorneys-were-racist/. We also talked about the Racial Justice Act and NC Supreme Court case State v. Robinson along with State v. Tucker.
Mon, 27 Feb 2023 - 14min - 21 - Love is in the Air (The Background to Obergefell v. Hodges)Mon, 13 Feb 2023 - 13min
- 20 - Santos-Zacaria v. Garland: What Do We Owe Immigrants?
Santos-Zacaria v. Garland regards a trans woman from Guatemala facing deportation in the United Stations. She filed for stay of deportation based on past persecution in her native country. The episode discusses the responsibilities we have to immigrants and potential deportees, especially when it comes to bodily safety.
Read more about the case and listen to the oral arguments here:
https://www.oyez.org/cases/2022/21-1436
Mon, 30 Jan 2023 - 06min - 19 - What does your vote count for? (Merrill v. Milligan)
On today's episode we are discussing Merrill v. Milligan a case regarding redistricting in Alabama and Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. What is democracy, if not representation of the will of the people?
You can read more about the case and listen to the oral argument here: https://www.oyez.org/cases/2022/21-1086.
Here are some additional resources we used in creating this episode:
Case overview from Cornell Law: https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/21-1086
Merrill v. Milligan SCOTUS stay order in February: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21a375_d18f.pdf
Brnovich v. DNC decision: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/19-1257_g204.pdf
Mon, 16 Jan 2023 - 17min - 18 - Reconciling Public Accommodations and the First Amendment (303 Creative LLC v. Elenis)
Today, we are discussing 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis. This case covers multitude of issues but at the forefront are religious freedom, freedom of speech, and anti-discrimination legislation. The case was argued on December 5th, 2022. You can listen to the oral argument here: https://www.oyez.org/cases/2022/21-476
Mon, 02 Jan 2023 - 21min - 17 - We're All Susceptible To Virtual Echo Chambers: How Do We Hold Media Platforms Accountable?Mon, 19 Dec 2022 - 12min
- 16 - Is Arizona cruisin' past federal law? (Cruz v. Arizona)Mon, 05 Dec 2022 - 07min
- 15 - So, what went down on November 8th, 2022? (Midterm Election Debrief)Mon, 21 Nov 2022 - 16min
- 14 - Midterm Elections: VOTE
Tomorrow is Election Day, and there's a lot on your ballot. It's difficult to educate yourself on candidates representing your values, but we encourage you to cast your vote tomorrow if you are eligible (if not, there's still a lot you can do to ensure your loved ones vote).
Visit https://www.vote.org/ to make your plan to vote ASAP.
Mon, 07 Nov 2022 - 08min - 13 - What is "Independent State Legislature Theory" and what does it mean for our democracy?Mon, 24 Oct 2022 - 12min
- 12 - Are Laws Protecting Indigenous Cultures/Tribes Racially Discriminatory?Mon, 10 Oct 2022 - 11min
- 11 - Religion and the LGBTQ+ Community: Is it religious freedom to forbid an LGBTQ+ group from gathering on a college campus?
Yeshiva University, a private religious university, does not want a student-run LGBTQ+ group of campus. What are the ramifications of that, and is it religious freedom? This is the first of a few SCOTUS cases regarding the LGBTQ+ community this term, although this was not an official case in the sense that there were no hearings and the opinion is not a final opinion.
Mon, 26 Sep 2022 - 14min - 10 - Affirmative Action Pt. 1: When is discrimination on the basis of race okay?
On today's episode, we discuss race-based affirmative action and what it means. Why is it an issue that the Supreme Court will be taking on in the upcoming term? Stay tuned for the 2nd part of this episode where we will discuss the lawsuits themselves and the ramifications of the decision once it is out.
Mon, 12 Sep 2022 - 16min - 8 - Episode 7: Introduction To SCOTUSMon, 29 Aug 2022 - 17min
- 7 - Episode 6: The Dismantling of Roe v. Wade. (Dobbs v. Jackson)Mon, 22 Aug 2022 - 24min
- 6 - Episode 5: Where do we draw the line with school and religion? (Carson v. Makin)
In this episode of Barely Legal, we talk about Carson v. Makin, a case regarding schools and religion but more specifically with government funding for religious schools. You can read more about the case here: https://www.oyez.org/cases/2021/20-1088!
Mon, 15 Aug 2022 - 11min - 5 - Episode 4: Do you need proper cause for concealed carry? (NY State Pistol & Rifle Association v. Bruen)Mon, 08 Aug 2022 - 20min
- 4 - Episode 3: Vega v. TekohMon, 01 Aug 2022 - 12min
- 3 - Episode 2: West Virginia v. EPA
In this episode we discuss West Virginia v. EPA. The case curtails the ability of federal agencies to set drastic regulations in relevant sectors. You can read more about the decision here: https://www.oyez.org/cases/2021/20-1530!
Mon, 25 Jul 2022 - 14min - 2 - Episode 1: Kennedy v. Bremerton School DistrictMon, 18 Jul 2022 - 17min
Podcasts ähnlich wie Beyond The Judgement
Activist Lawyer activistlawyer- Judgemental Bauer Media
- Chasing Life with Dr. Sanjay Gupta CNN Podcasts
- El Partidazo de COPE COPE
- Herrera en COPE COPE
- Es la Mañana de Federico esRadio
- La noche de Cuesta esRadio
- Hondelatte Raconte Europe 1
- Affaires sensibles France Inter
- We Advocate Gordon & Annie VanderLeek
- MALAYALAM NEWS G Ravi
- LEGEND Guillaume Pley
- Mindful Reading James de Klerk & Peter Banda
- Your Legal Rights KALW
- The Dirty Verdict Kyle Herbert
- Financial Judgement Lesley Thomas
- El colegio invisible OndaCero
- Les grands dossiers de l'Histoire par Franck Ferrand Radio Classique
- Espacio en blanco Radio Nacional
- Entrez dans l'Histoire RTL
- Les Grosses Têtes RTL
- L'Heure Du Crime RTL
- El Larguero SER Podcast
- SER Historia SER Podcast
