Supreme Court Ph Podcast

Does the use of online chat logs and videos as evidence in court proceedings violate the right to privacy?

Listen to the #SupremeCourtPH Podcast with guest Judge Janice L. Andrade-Udarbe, Presiding Judge of the Regional Trial Court, Branch 57, Lucena City, Quezon, and Acting Presiding Judge of Pasig City RTC Branch 161. Judge Andrade-Udarbe is also Professorial Lecturer at the Philippine Judicial Academy, an MCLE Lecturer, a law professor, Bar reviewer, and author of law books.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Judge Andrade-Udarbe discuss the use of online chat logs and videos as evidence vis-à-vis the right to privacy, within the context of the case of 𝘗𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘗𝘩𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘱𝘱𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘴 𝘷. 𝘌𝘶𝘭 𝘝𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘖. 𝘙𝘰𝘥𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘶𝘦𝘻, G.R. No. 263603. This Decision was penned by then Associate Justice Mario V. Lopez and promulgated by the Supreme Court Second Division on October 9, 2023.

Can a trial court issue a provisional custody order based solely on a parental compromise agreement without conducting a full-blown trial? In child custody cases, are courts bound by what parents agree on, or does the best interest of the child always come first?

Listen to the #SupremeCourtPH Podcast with guest Court of Appeals Associate Justice Emily L. San Gaspar-Gito. She is a member of the Family Law and Civil Law Departments of the Philippine Judicial Academy, as well as the Court of Appeals Committee on Rules and the Supreme Court Committee on Family Courts and Juvenile Concerns. She is also a law professor and Bar reviewer.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Justice San Gaspar-Gito discuss parental compromise agreements and the best interest of the child in custody cases within the context of the case of Empuerto v. Cabrillos, GR No. 268979. This decision was penned by Senior Associate Justice Marvic M.V.F. Leonen and promulgated by the Supreme Court Second Division on February 5, 2025.

For legitimated children, how do you correct details in their birth certificates to reflect their father’s surname?

Listen to the #SupremeCourtPH Podcast with guest Court of Appeals Associate Justice Emily L. San Gaspar-Gito. She is a member of the Family Law and Civil Law Departments of the Philippine Judicial Academy, as well as the Court of Appeals Committee on Rules and the Supreme Court Committee on Family Courts and Juvenile Concerns. She is also a law professor and Bar reviewer.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Justice San Gaspar-Gito discuss legitimation and change of surname within the context of the case of Teresita Calliza Barba v. Local Civil Registrars of Manila and of Cebu City, G.R. No. 269743. This Decision was penned by Senior Associate Justice Marvic M.V.F. Leonen and promulgated by the Supreme Court Second Division on August 18, 2025.

Does the use of common familial terms such as “uncle” or “niece” in a criminal information, particularly in rape cases, sufficiently inform the accused of the nature of their relationship to the victim, especially when the relationship qualifies the crime and increases the penalty?

Listen to the #SupremeCourtPH Podcast with guest Atty. Dean Ace Pamaran, a Bar Examiner in Criminal Law during the 2024 Bar Examinations. He is a seasoned court attorney and law professor with extensive experience in decision writing, legal research, judicial management and administration, and legal education. He has also lectured on the Supreme Court Strategic Plan for Judicial Innovations or SPJI, gender sensitivity and gender-based violence, tourism laws, cybercrime, and legal writing.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Atty. Pamaran discuss the significance of making proper allegations in a criminal information within the context of the case of People of the Philippines v. BBB254878, G.R. No. 254878. This Decision was penned by Associate Justice Henri Jean Paul B. Inting and promulgated by the Supreme Court En Banc on October 22, 2024.

How can a valid arrest collapse over an unmarked gun, and how crucial is the chain of custody in securing a conviction under RA 10591, or the Comprehensive Firearms and Ammunition Regulation Act?

Listen to the #SupremeCourtPH Podcast with guest Atty. Dean Ace A. Pamaran, a Bar Examiner in Criminal Law during the 2024 Bar Examinations. He is a seasoned court attorney and law professor with extensive experience in decision-writing, legal research, judicial management and administration, and legal education. He has also lectured on the Supreme Court Strategic Plan for Judicial Innovations or SPJI, gender sensitivity and gender-based violence, tourism laws, cybercrime, and legal writing.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Atty. Pamaran discuss about the handling of seized firearms during a warrantless search within the context of the case of Tony Baclig II v. People of the Philippines, G.R. No. 252644. This Decision was penned by Associate Justice Henri Jean Paul B. Inting and promulgated by the Supreme Court En Banc on April 8, 2026.

How will eNotarization benefit the public and transform the way Filipinos access notarization services?

Listen to the #SupremeCourtPH Podcast with guest Atty. Bettina Melchor, Interim Electronic Notary Administrator and Officer-in-Charge of the Office of the Bar Confidant.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Atty. Melchor discuss electronic notarization, as well as significant provisions of the eNotarization Rules and the Guidelines on the Accreditation of Electronic Notarization Facility Providers under A.M. No. 24-10-14-SC.

Paano nakatutulong ang paggamit ng Wikang Filipino sa mga desisyon ng Korte Suprema sa pagpapalapit ng hustisya sa mamamayan habang napapanatili ang kawastuhan ng pangangatwirang legal?

Pakinggan ang #SupremeCourtPH Podcast kasama si Retiradong Court of Appeals Associate Justice Apolinario D. Bruselas, Jr. Naging Bar Examiner si Justice Bruselas sa Criminal Law (2010 at 2019) at Remedial Law (2013). Siya ay dating nagsilbi bilang Judge ng Regional Trial Court ng Lungsod ng Quezon City, at bilang prosecutor sa Makati City.

Sa pagtatapos ng dalawang-bahaging serye ng podcast na ito, ipagpapatuloy nina Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo at (Ret.) Justice Bruselas, Jr. ang talakayan sa pagsusulong ng Korte Suprema sa paggamit ng wikang Filipino sa mga desisyon nito, gaya ng Velarde laban sa Hukuman ng Pag-aapela sa Buwis, G.R. Bilang 210480. Ang Desisyong ito ay isinulat ni Kasangguning Mahistrado Maria Filomena Singh at inilabas ng Ikatlong Dibisyon ng Korte Suprema noong ika-29 ng Enero, taong 2026.

Mahalaga ba ang pagsusulong sa paggamit ng wikang Filipino sa pagsulat ng mga desisyon ng mga hukuman sa Pilipinas? Mas magiging malinaw at mas madaling mauunawaan ba ng nakararaming Pilipino ang mga desisyon kung ang mga ito ay nasusulat sa ating sariling wika?

Pakinggan ang #SupremeCourtPH Podcast kasama si Retiradong Court of Appeals Associate Justice Apolinario D. Bruselas, Jr. Naging Bar Examiner si Justice Bruselas sa Criminal Law (2010 at 2019) at Remedial Law (2013). Siya ay dating nagsilbi bilang Judge ng Regional Trial Court ng Lungsod ng Quezon City, at bilang prosecutor sa Makati City.

Tatalakayin nina Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo at (Ret.) Justice Bruselas, Jr. sa unang bahagi ng dalawang-bahaging serye ang pagsusulong ng Korte Suprema sa paggamit ng wikang Filipino sa mga desisyon nito, tulad sa kasong Sambayanang Pilipinas laban kay GGG269811, G.R. Bilang 269811. Ang Desisyon na ito ay isinulat ni Kasangguning Mahistrado Maria Filomena Singh at inilabas ng Ikatlong Dibisyon ng Korte Suprema noong ika-7 ng Abril, taong 2026.

Where should the line be drawn between news reporting by the media and a fair trial? How should the law balance a journalist’s duty and responsibility to report on matters of public concern against the court’s duty to protect the fairness of judicial proceedings?

Listen to the #SupremeCourtPH Podcast with guest Atty. Dante B. Gatmaytan, a Member of the Constitutional Law Department of the Philippine Judicial Academy. Atty. Gatmaytan is a professor at the University of the Philippines College of Law where he teaches Constitutional Law, Legal Method, and Local Governments. Before entering the academe, he was a public interest lawyer focusing on environmental and natural resources law, Indigenous People's rights, agrarian reform, and local governance. He also previously served as head of the Information and Publication Division and as director of the Institute for the Administration of Justice of the UP Law Center.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Atty. Gatmaytan discuss about press freedom, fair trial, and contempt within the context of the case of ABS-CBN Corp. and Cariño v. Datu Andal Ampatuan, Jr., G.R. No. 227004. This Decision was penned by Senior Associate Justice Marvic M.V.F. Leonen and promulgated by the Supreme Court En Banc on April 25, 2023.

Does a congressional inquiry into the spread of fake news online violate the right to free speech or is it considered a legitimate fact-finding exercise in aid of legislation?

Listen to the #SupremeCourtPH Podcast with guest Atty. Dante B. Gatmaytan, a Member of the Constitutional Law Department of the Philippine Judicial Academy. Atty. Gatmaytan is a professor at the University of the Philippines College of Law where he teaches Constitutional Law, Legal Method, and Local Governments. Before entering the academe, he was a public interest lawyer focusing on environmental and natural resources law, Indigenous People's rights, agrarian reform, and local governance. He also previously served as head of the Information and Publication Division of the UP Law Center and as director of the Institute for the Administration of Justice.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Atty. Gatmaytan discuss about freedom of speech and legislative inquiries within the context of the case of Ernesto Abines Jr. et al. v. House of Representatives et al., GR No. 278101. This decision was penned by Associate Justice Amy C. Lazaro-Javier and promulgated by the Supreme Court En Banc on July 8, 2025.

While lenders and borrowers in a loan agreement may adjust stipulated interest rates, how can borrowers determine when interest charges on loans are no longer reasonable and fair?

Listen to the #SupremeCourtPH Podcast with guest Atty. Reinier Paul R. Yebra, an examiner in Commercial and Taxation Laws during the 2023 Bar examinations. A graduate and class valedictorian of the San Beda University College of Law in 2009, he also topped the Bar Examinations that same year. He served as Undersecretary for Legal Affairs of the Department of Transportation from 2017 to 2024 and as Acting Deputy Director in the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas from 2011 to 2017. He is also a law professor and a Bar reviewer.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Atty. Yebra discuss loans and their corresponding interest rates within the context of the case of Manila Credit Corp. v. Viroomal, G.R. No. 258526. This Decision was penned by then Associate Justice Mario V. Lopez and promulgated by the Supreme Court Second Division on January 11, 2023.

Should banks be held liable for unauthorized withdrawals from a depositor’s account, particularly those involving substantial amounts, if they fail to exercise the highest degree of diligence required by law?

Listen to the #SupremeCourtPH Podcast with guest Atty. Reinier Paul R. Yebra, an examiner in Commercial and Taxation Laws during the 2023 Bar examinations. He served as Undersecretary for Legal Affairs of the Department of Transportation from 2017 to 2025 and as Acting Deputy Director in the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) from 2011 to 2017. A graduate of the San Beda University College of Law, where he was class valedictorian in 2009, he also topped the Bar Examinations that same year. He teaches commercial law and has authored various publications on the BSP, microfinancing, and special banking laws.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Atty. Yebra discuss unauthorized bank withdrawals, as well as banking rules and unsanctioned transactions within the context of the case of Banco de Oro Universal Bank, Inc. v. Seastres, G.R. No. 257151. This Decision was penned by Associate Justice Alfredo Benjamin S. Caguioa and promulgated by the Supreme Court Third Division on February 13, 2023.

With the Judiciary’s latest reforms and renewed ethical commitment by Judiciary, how does the 2025 Code of Judicial Conduct and Accountability balance judges’ and justices’ personal freedom with the responsibility to uphold integrity and maintain public trust in today’s era of social media, artificial intelligence, and heightened public scrutiny?

Listen to the #SupremeCourtPH Podcast with guest Atty. Joan S. Largo, a Member of the Judicial and Philosophy Department of the Philippine Judicial Academy and of the Supreme Court Technical Working Group that drafted The 2025 Code of Judicial Conduct and Accountability. She served as the Bar Examiner in Remedial Law in the 2020/21 Bar Examinations and in Civil Law for the 2023 Bar Examinations. She is currently the Vice President for Administration of the University San Carlos and the long-serving former dean of USC’s School of Law and Governance in Cebu. She is the first woman to serve as USC’s Vice President.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Atty. Largo discuss the 2025 Code of Judicial Conduct and Accountability, the updated version of the 2004 Code of Judicial Conduct, which governs the conduct of all Justices and judges.

In a contracting arrangement, how do we determine who the true employer is?

Listen to the #SupremeCourtPH Podcast with guest Atty. Marlon J. Manuel, a Labor Law examiner for the 2022 Bar Examinations and a faculty member of the Ateneo de Manila University (AdMU) School of Law, teaching Labor Law. He is also a Bar Review and Mandatory Continuing Legal Education lecturer at AdMU and previously served as Coordinator of the Alternative Law Groups from 2008-2017.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Atty. Manuel discuss contracting agreements within the context of the case of Delera and Quiling v. Philippine Foremost Milling, Corp., Amigo Logistics Corp., MMA Competent Manpower & General Services, Inc., G.R. No. 258481. This Decision was promulgated by the Supreme Court Third Division on November 10, 2025.

In the context of media workers, how does the Court determine whether workers are regular employees or independent contractors? Can workers engaged under Talent Agreements still be considered regular employees?

Listen to the #SupremeCourtPH Podcast with guest Atty. Marlon J. Manuel, a Labor Law examiner for the 2022 Bar Examinations and a faculty member of the Ateneo de Manila University (AdMU) School of Law, teaching Labor Law. He is also a Bar Review and Mandatory Continuing Legal Education lecturer at AdMU and previously served as Coordinator of the Alternative Law Groups from 2008-2017.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Atty. Manuel discuss regular employees, independent contractors, and talent agreements within the context of the consolidated cases of GMA Network, Inc v. Cabaluna, G.R. No. 250673, and GMA Network, Inc. v. Cabaluna, et al., G.R. No. 254711. This resolution was promulgated by the Court’s Third Division on July 16, 2025.

Does entitlement to overtime pay extend to security guards under a ‘broken period’ scheme when their designated rest intervals are too brief to allow practical personal use?

Listen to the #SupremeCourtPH Podcast with guest Atty. Evelyn (Leo) D. Battad, a member of the Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Department of the Philippine Judicial Academy. She also teaches the same subject at the University of the Philippines Graduate School of Law. A human rights advocate, Attorney Battad is also an associate professor at the UP College of Law, where she teaches labor and social legislation, among others.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Atty. Battad discuss the payment of overtime wages within the context of the case of Lorenzo D. Cambila Jr. and Albajar S. Samad v. Seabren Security Agency and Elizabeth S. Dureza, G.R. No. 261716. This Decision was penned by Justice Henri Jean Paul B. Inting and promulgated by the Supreme Court Third Division on October 21, 2024.

What are the effects of accepting a formal job offer? Does an employer-employee relationship commence once a formal job offer is accepted and signed?

Listen to the #SupremeCourtPH Podcast with guest Atty. E. (Leo) D. Battad, a member of the Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Department of the Philippine Judicial Academy. She also teaches the same subject at the University of the Philippines Graduate School of Law. A human rights advocate, Attorney Battad is also an associate professor at the UP College of Law, where she teaches labor and social legislation, among others.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Atty. Battad discuss what happens when a job offer is accepted, and the implications for employer-employee relationship within the context of the case of Paolo Aragones v. Alltech Biotechnology Corporation, et al., GR No. 251736. This decision was penned by Associate Justice Alfredo Benjamin S. Caguioa and promulgated by the Supreme Court Third Division on April 2, 2025.

How do the Rules on Filipino Sign Language Interpreting in the Judiciary move beyond simple translation to recognizing the d/Deaf community’s cultural identity? What role do the Rules play in ensuring the d/Deaf’s constitutional right to effectively participate in judicial processes?

Listen to the #SupremeCourtPH Podcast with guest Judge Remiebel U. Mondia of Branch 110, Regional Trial Court, Pasay City. A Filipino Sign Language interpreter, Judge Mondia is a member of the Technical Working Group of the Supreme Court that drafted the Rules on Filipino Sign Language Interpreting in the Judiciary. Judge Mondia is currently a Board Member and Legal Head of the Philippine Registry of Interpreters for the Deaf.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Judge Mondia discuss the FSL Rules which took effect on December 15, 2025. This initiative is a core component of the Court’s Strategic Plan for Judicial Innovations 2022-2027 or SPJI, which seeks to dismantle barriers and ensure equitable and accessible justice for court users who rely on FSL.

In rape cases, how crucial is the non-consensual nature of the sexual act in determining whether it constitutes a crime and whether reasonable doubt exists? Can a deaf person be expected to give full consent to a sexual act?

Listen to the #SupremeCourtPH Podcast with guest Judge Remiebel U. Mondia of the Pasay City Regional Trial Court, Branch 110. A Filipino Sign Language interpreter, Judge Mondia is a member of the Technical Working Group of the Supreme Court that drafted the Rules on Filipino Sign Language Interpreting in the Judiciary. Judge Mondia is currently a Board Member and Legal Head of the Philippine Registry of Interpreters for the Deaf.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Judge Mondia discuss the fundamental role of consent in sexual acts and its impact on establishing the guilt beyond reasonable doubt within the context of the case of People of the Philippines v. San Pedro, G.R. No. 219850. This Decision was penned by Associate Justice Samuel H. Gaerlan and decided by the Supreme Court First Division on July 14, 2021.

Under the law, are satellite airtime fees paid to a non-resident foreign corporation considered income from within the Philippines, and therefore subject to final withholding tax? If so, is the local payor liable for deficiency withholding tax and delinquency interest?

Listen to the #SupremeCourtPH Podcast with guest Court of Tax Appeals Associate Justice Lanee S. Cui-David. A certified public accountant, Justice Cui-David is a member of the Taxation Law Department of the Philippine Judicial Academy. She previously served as Deputy Commissioner of the Bureau of Internal Revenue and headed the Bureau’s Information Systems Group.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Justice Cui-David discuss income tax from satellite transmissions within the context of the case of Aces Philippines Cellular Satellite Corporation v. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue, GR No. 226680. This decision was penned by Associate Justice Henri Jean Paul B. Inting and decided by the Supreme Court En Banc on August 30, 2022.

Are interment services covered by the 20% discount on funeral and burial expenses provided by the Senior Citizens Act and its amending laws?

Listen to the #SupremeCourtPH Podcast with guest Court of Tax Appeals Associate Justice Lanee S. Cui-David. A certified public accountant, Justice David is a member of the Taxation Law Department of the Philippine Judicial Academy. She previously served as Deputy Commissioner of the Bureau of Internal Revenue and headed the Bureau’s Information Systems Group.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Justice Cui-David discuss the extent of the 20% discount for senior citizens within the context of the case of Republic of the Philippines v. Pryce Corporation, G.R. No. 243133. This decision was penned by Associate Justice Rodil V. Zalameda and decided by the Supreme Court En Banc on March 8, 2023.

In tax cases, under what circumstances does the extended 10-year assessment period apply as opposed to the basic three-year assessment period under the Tax Code?

Listen to the #SupremeCourtPH Podcast with guest Atty. Maria Gracia M. Pulido-Tan, a Member of the Taxation Law Department of the Philippine Judicial Academy. A CertifiedPublic Accountant, Atty. Pulido-Tan is the first woman Chairperson of the Philippine Commission on Audit (2011-2015). She also served as a Commissioner of the Presidential Commission on Good Government (2002-2003), and asUndersecretary of the Department of Finance (2003-2005).

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Atty. Pulido-Tan discuss tax assessment periods within the context of the case of McDonald’s PhilippinesRealty Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, GR No. 247737. This decision was penned by Associate Justice Henri Jean Paul B. Inting and decided by the Supreme Court En Banc on August 8, 2023.

Does the acquittal of an accused in a criminal tax case automatically extinguish civil liability for deficiency taxes or relieve the taxpayer of the obligation to pay unpaid taxes?

Listen to the #SupremeCourtPH Podcast with guest Atty. Maria Gracia M. Pulido-Tan, a Member of the Taxation Law Department of the Philippine Judicial Academy. A Certified Public Accountant, Atty. Pulido-Tan is the first woman Chairperson of the Philippine Commission on Audit (2011-2015). She also served as a Commissioner of the Presidential Commission on Good Government (2002-2003), and as Undersecretary of the Department of Finance (2003-2005).

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Atty. Pulido-Tan discuss the civil liability of a taxpayer accused for deficiency taxes despite his or her acquittal in a criminal action for violation of tax laws within the context of the case of People of the Philippines v. E & D Parts Supply Inc. and Margaret L. Uy, GR No. 259284. This decision was penned by Associate Justice Mario V. Lopez and decided by the Supreme Court Second Division on January 24, 2024.

Does the erroneous inclusion of a deceased person among incorporators automatically amount to fraud sufficient to warrant the revocation of its registration? What constitutes fraud in incorporation?

Listen to the #SupremeCourtPH Podcast with guest Atty. Maria Zarah R. Villanueva-Castro, Bar Examiner in Commercial Law (2022) and in Commercial and Taxation Laws (2024). She is also a bar reviewer and law professor, and is a Vice-President and Head of Corporate Legal of MERALCO.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Atty. Villanueva-Castro discuss the validity of incorporation within the context of the consolidated cases of Securities and Exchange Commission v. AZ 17/31 Realty, Inc., G.R. Nos. 239010, and Locsin-Garcia v. AZ 17/31 Realty, Inc., G.R. No. 240888. This Decision was penned by Associate Justice Amy C. Lazaro-Javier and decided by the Supreme Court Second Division on July 6, 2022.

A family conflict reaches the boardroom of several corporations. What constitutes a valid quorum in intra-corporate meetings, and what is the primary basis for determining which stockholders are recognized as stockholders of record in validating a stockholders’ meeting and election?

Listen to the #SupremeCourtPH Podcast with guest Atty. Maria Zarah R. Villanueva-Castro, Bar Examiner in Commercial Law (2022) and in Commercial and Taxation Laws (2024). She is also a bar reviewer and law professor, and is a Vice-President and Head of Corporate Legal of MERALCO.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Atty. Villanueva-Castro discuss stock ownership and intra-corporate disputes within the context of the case of Lopez v. Lopez, G.R. Nos. 254957-58. This resolution was penned by Supreme Court Associate Justice Ramon Paul L. Hernando and decided by the Supreme Court First Division on April 21, 2025.

When a pregnant employee is reassigned to another location, what are the boundaries of an employer’s management prerogative? When do such actions constitute constructive dismissal or pregnancy-based discrimination?

Listen to the #SupremeCourtPH Podcast with guest Sandiganbayan Associate Justice Maria Theresa V. Mendoza-Arcega, Vice President of the International Association of Women Judges.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Justice Arcega explore these issues and discuss the rights of women in the workplace within the context of the case of Paulino v. Sutherland Global Services, Inc.-Clark, G. R. No. 262564. This decision was penned by Associate Justice Henri Jean Paul B. Inting and decided by the Supreme Court Third Division on August 6, 2025.

Does Republic Act No. 9262, the Anti-Violence Against Women and Their Children Act, extend protection to women in lesbian relationships?

Listen to the #SupremeCourtPH Podcast with guest Sandiganbayan Associate Justice Maria Theresa V. Mendoza-Arcega, Vice President of the International Association of Women Judges.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Justice Arcega talk about Republic Act No. 9262 or the Anti-Violence Against

Women and Their Children Act within the context of the case of Jacinto v. Fouts, G. R. No. 250627. This resolution was penned by Associate Justice Henri Jean Paul B. Inting and decided by the Supreme Court Third Division on December 7, 2022.

How has the Supreme Court's interpretation of psychological incapacity evolved over time, and what does this evolution reveal about the Court's continuing effort to balance the protection of marriage with the realities of marital breakdown?

Listen to the #SupremeCourtPH Podcast with guest Atty. Ma. Soledad Deriquito-Mawis, Member of the Philippine Judicial Academy Department of Civil Law, and Dean of the College of Law of Lyceum of the Philippines University.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Dean Mawis talk about the evolution of the Philippine Supreme Court's interpretation of psychological incapacity within the context of the case of Rosanna L. Tan-Andal v. Mario Victor M. Andal, GR No. 196359. This decision was penned by Senior Associate Justice Marvic M. V. F. Leonen and decided by the Supreme Court En Banc on May 11, 2021.

What is the effect of a declaration of nullity of marriage on the legitimated status of a child? Do children born before a marriage that is later annulled or declared void remain legitimate, or does their status revert to illegitimacy?

Listen to the #SupremeCourtPH Podcast with guest Atty. Ma. Soledad Deriquito-Mawis, Member of the Philippine Judicial Academy Department of Civil Law, and Dean of the College of Law of Lyceum of the Philippines University.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Dean Mawis talk about annulment and declaration of nullity of marriage, including their differences and effects on the legitimacy of children, within the context of the case of Republic of the Philippines v. Linney Jean L. Tangarorang and Ramer R. Tangarorang, G.R. No. 272006, penned by Associate Justice Jhosep Y. Lopez and decided by the Supreme Court Second Division on February 5, 2025.

When is a tax payment considered wrongfully or illegally collected? When does the two-year period start for claiming a tax refund?

Listen to the #SupremeCourtPH Podcast with guest Court of Tax Appeals Associate Justice Marian Ivy F. Reyes-Fajardo, 2024 Bar Examiner for Commercial and Taxation Law.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Justice Fajardo talk about claiming tax refunds within the context of the case of Melco Resorts Leisure Corporation v. Commission of Internal Revenue, GR No. 271261, penned by Associate Justice Ramon Paul L. Hernando, and decided by the Supreme Court First Division on April 2, 2025.

When are businesses registered under the Philippine Economic Zone Authority or PEZA exempt from paying value-added tax or VAT?

Listen to the #SupremeCourtPH Podcast with guest Court of Tax Appeals Associate Justice Marian Ivy F. Reyes-Fajardo, 2024 Bar Examiner for Commercial and Taxation Law.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Justice Fajardo talk about value-added tax (VAT) exemptions within the context of the case of Coral Bay Nickel Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, G.R. No. 251333-34, penned by Associate Justice Japar B. Dimaampao, and decided by the Supreme Court Third Division on March 5, 2025.

In criminal cases, what is conspiracy and how is it proven? Does mere presence at preparatory meetings and expressions of agreement amount to conspiracy without proof of an overt act?

Listen to the #SupremeCourtPH Podcast with guest Atty. Theodore O. Te, who is the Chairperson of the Philippine Judicial Academy Department of Humanitarian Law and Human Rights. He has served as Chief of the Supreme Court Public Information Office and has been Bar Examiner thrice. Professor Te teaches criminal law and procedure at the University of the Philippines College of Law.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo speaks with Atty. Te on the Court’s ruling on Maguindanao Massacre, the requirement of overt acts to establish conspiracy, and the fundamental principles that safeguard criminal liability under the rule of law.

What procedural lapses led the Court to treat earlier impeachment complaints as already initiated? How did the Court interpret “session days” and the role of the House Committee on Justice? And what guidance does this ruling provide for the conduct of future impeachment proceedings in Congress?

Listen to the #SupremeCourtPH Podcast with guest Atty. Tranquil Gervacio S. Salvador III, Dean of the School of Law and Jurisprudence of the Manila Adventist College and Professorial Lecturer of the Philippine Judicial Academy.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo speaks with Dean Tranquil on key issues surrounding the Supreme Court’s impeachment rulings, including the political question doctrine, the one-year bar rule, due process, and their implications for constitutional accountability.

In cases involving police officers or persons of authority, how does the Court evaluate testimony and other pieces of evidence, and determine lawful police conduct?

Listen to the #SupremeCourtPH Podcast with guest Atty. Theodore O. Te, who is the Chairperson of the Philippine Judicial Academy Department of Humanitarian Law and Human Rights. He has served as Chief of the Supreme Court Public Information Office and has been Bar Examiner thrice. Professor Te teaches criminal law and procedure at the University of the Philippines College of Law.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo speaks with Atty. Te on the lessons of the Kian delos Santos case, emphasizing lawful police conduct, credible forensic evidence, and the Court’s message on the rule of law.

How does a person’s journey through wrongful conviction and incarceration shape his or her concept of justice? What lessons can one with lived experience of injustice teach about justice? What key measures must be put in place in order to prevent prolonged or unjust detention?

Listen to the #SupremeCourtPH Podcast with guest Dr. Raymund Narag, Associate Professor at the School of Justice and Public Safety in Southern Illinois University. A person restored of liberty, he is currently the head consultant of Prisoners' Enhancement and Support Organization Inc. or PRESO.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo sits down with Dr. Narag, whose story of perseverance transforms the conversation on jail and prison decongestion, emphasizing how purposeful reform and timely justice can uplift lives and strengthen the justice system.

Where does our government stand today in terms of addressing the persistent challenge of congestion in jails and detention centers? What plans are being put in place to ensure lasting, human, and effective solutions?

Listen to the #SupremeCourtPH Podcast with guest Court of Appeals Associate Justice Jaime Fortunato Caringal; New Bilibid Prison Superintendent

C/SSUPT Roger Boncales; and Bureau of Jail Management and Penology Community Relations Service Office Acting Chief and Spokesperson JSUPT Jayrex Joseph Bustinera.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo discuss with Justice Caringal, Sr. Supt. Boncales, and J/Supt. Bustinera the issue of jail and prison overcrowding ahead of the Second National Decongestion Summit, which will be held on January 21-23, 2026 at the Manila Hotel.

As we mark our 100th podcast episode today, we look back at how the #SupremeCourtPH Podcast began, how each episode is produced, and some of the highlights from past episodes.

Listen to the #SCphPodcast as Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Information Officer V Tiffany Atendido-Beltran share their personal anecdotes and thoughts on the podcast.

How does the law protect insured parties when insurers delay or deny payment? Does the recovery of a stolen vehicle prevent the insured owner from receiving full payment under an insurance policy?

Listen to the #SupremeCourtPH Podcast with guest Atty. Jose Maria G. Hofileña, Member of the Commercial Law Department of the Philippine Judicial Academy, and Dean of the School of Law of the Ateneo de Manila University.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Dean Hofileña discuss how the law protects insured parties against delayed or denied claims, and whether recovering a stolen vehicle affects full insurance payment within the context of Wilfrido C. Wijangco v. UCPB General Insurance Co. Inc., G.R. No. 257086, penned by Associate Justice Henri Jean Paul B. Inting, and decided by the Supreme Court Third Division on April 23, 2025.

When a brand-new car turns out to be defective, which law should protect the buyer: Republic Act No. 7394, also known as the Consumer Act of the Philippines, or Republic Act No.10642, or the Philippine Lemon Law? Are these laws mutually exclusive, or can a consumer choose between the two? How should the rights of vehicle buyers be weighed in relation to those of car manufacturers and dealers?

Listen to the #SupremeCourtPH Podcast with guest Atty. Jose Maria G. Hofileña, Member of the Commercial Law Department of the Philippine Judicial Academy, and Dean of the School of Law of the Ateneo de Manila University.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Dean Hofileña discuss the laws that protect consumers within the context of the case of Department of Trade and Industry v. Toyota Balintawak, Inc. and Toyota Motor Phils. Corp., G.R. Nos. 254978-79, penned by Associate Justice Antonio T. Kho, Jr., decided by the Supreme Court Second Division on October 11, 2023.

What are considered small claims cases, and what is the procedure in pursuing and settling them? How can understanding the process of setting small claims empower ordinary Filipinos to trust our courts by giving them access to efficient justice?

Listen to the #SupremeCourtPH Podcast with guest Judge Jackie B. Crisologo-Saguisag of Branch 67, Metropolitan Trial Court, Makati City. She is a Member of the Remedial Law Department of the Philippine Judicial Academy and a Member of the Supreme Court Technical Working Group for the Committee on the Revision of the Rules on Summary Procedure and Small Claims Cases.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Judge Crisologo-Saguisag discuss the simplified and expedited process of resolving specific civil disputes under the 2016 Revised Rules of Procedure for Small Claims Cases as provided in Administrative Matter No. 08-8-7-SC.

When someone forces their way to take over a piece of real property, how do courts determine who truly has the right to possess property?

Listen to the #SupremeCourtPH Podcast with guest Judge Jackie B. Crisologo-Saguisag of Branch 67, Metropolitan Trial Court, Makati City. She is a Member of the Remedial Law Department of the Philippine Judicial Academy and a Member of the Supreme Court Technical Working Group for the Committee on the Revision of the Rules on Summary Procedure and Small Claims Cases.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Judge Crisologo-Saguisag discuss forcible entry, unlawful detainer, and the Rule on Summary Procedure within the context of the case of Edgar M. Rico v. Ernie “Toto” Castillo, G.R. No. 215166, penned by Associate Justice Jose Midas P. Marquez, and decided by the Court’s First Division on July 23, 2024.

In purchasing real property in the Philippines, what should be the considerations of a buyer acting in good faith? How do the courts apply the principles of good faith and innocent purchaser for value in disputes involving sale of real properties? How important is the observance of due diligence when it comes to protecting one’s right as a real property buyer?

Listen to the #SupremeCourtPH Podcast with guest Court of Appeals Associate Justice Jose Lorenzo R. dela Rosa, a member of the Remedial Law Department of the Philippine Judicial Academy. He once served as the presiding judge of a family and exclusive land registration court in the City of Manila.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Justice dela Rosa discuss land titles and what buyers should do before purchasing lands within the context of the case of Spouses Orencio S. Manalese and Eloisa B. Manalese, and Aries B. Manalese v. The Estate of the Late Spouses Narciso and Ofelia Ferreras, G.R. No. 254046, penned by Associate Justice Alfredo Benjamin S. Caguioa, and decided by the Supreme Court Third Division on November 25, 2024.

Can an agrarian reform awardee legally mortgage or sell his or her land? What should prevail: the protection of agrarian reform’s social justice intent or the enforcement of private contractual rights?

Listen to the #SupremeCourtPH Podcast with guest Court of Appeals Associate Justice Jose Lorenzo R. dela Rosa, a member of the Remedial Law Department of the Philippine Judicial Academy. He once served as the presiding judge of a family and exclusive land registration court in the City of Manila.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Justice dela Rosa discuss mortgage and sale of lot properties covered by the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law within the context of the case of Elizabeth Ong Lim versus Lazaro N. Cruz, GR No. 248650, penned by Associate Justice Rodil V. Zalameda, decided on March 15, 2023.

In October 2022, the Supreme Court formally launched the Strategic Plan for Judicial Innovations 2022-2027 (SPJI), envisioned as a long-term reform program and a blueprint for action under the leadership of Chief Justice Alexander G. Gesmundo.

Three years on, what progress has been made on the plans laid out in SPJI? Are the lofty goals being achieved? Is the vision closer to becoming a reality?

In this special video episode, watch nine sitting Members of the Supreme Court, including Chief Justice Gesmundo and Senior Associate Justice Marvic M.V.F. Leonen, as they converse with Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo to discuss 14 transformative projects under the SPJI during its 3rd Anniversary event at the Manila Hotel on October 22, 2025.

This special video episode of the #SCphPodcast is also available on YouTube and the #SupremeCourtPH website.

How can our justice system balance accountability with compassion, ensuring that persons deprived of liberty (PDLs) are not only punished but also given real opportunities for reform and reintegration?

Listen to the conclusion of the two-part episode of the #SupremeCourtPH Podcast with guest Sandiganbayan Justice Karl B. Miranda, a staunch advocate of prison reform, rehabilitation, and reintegration.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo continues his conversation with Justice Miranda, who discusses concrete projects for the rehabilitation and reintegration of PDLs into society, among others.

This episode of the #SCphPodcast is also available on YouTube and the #SupremeCourtPH website.

How can a person deprived of liberty (PDL) find redemption? Can education behind bars transform lives and pave the way for reintegration?

Listen to the first of a two-part episode of the Supreme Court Podcast with guest Sandiganbayan Justice Karl B. Miranda, a staunch advocate of prison reform, rehabilitation, and reintegration.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo sits down with Justice Miranda, who shares his advocacy and personal experiences that inspired his lifelong commitment to the reform and reintegration of PDLs.

This episode of the #SCphPodcast is also available on YouTube and the #SupremeCourtPH website.

What is the Unified Legal Aid Service (ULAS), and why is there a need for it? Who are the qualified beneficiaries, and how do they apply for assistance? What kinds of legal services are considered to be creditable under ULAS Rules? And what's in it for lawyers who comply with the ULAS Rules?

Listen to the latest episode of the Supreme Court Podcast with guest Atty. Karl Arian A. Castillo, a private practitioner and a member of the ULAS interim board, chaired by Supreme Court Associate Justice Alfredo Benjamin S. Caguioa.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Atty. Castillo discuss the Rules on the Unified Legal Aid Service and its implementing manual.

This episode of the #SCphPodcast is also available on YouTube and the #SupremeCourtPH website.

Did the repeal of the Anti-Child Pornography Act of 2009 (RA 9775) through the passage of the Anti-Online Sexual Abuse or Exploitation of Children and Anti-Child Sexual Abuse or Exploitation Materials Act (RA 11930) extinguish the criminal liability of those charged with the former? What are the other effects of the subsequent enactment of RA 11930?

Listen to the latest episode of the Supreme Court Podcast with guest Court of Appeals Associate Justice Wilhelmina B. Jorge-Wagan, a member of the Supreme Court Special Committee on Cybercrime and Electronic Evidence, and a Professorial Lecturer at the Philippine Judicial Academy.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Justice Wagan talk about the repeal of a criminal act by its reenactment and whether it would extinguish or erase criminal liability within the context of the case of People of the Philippines v. YYY, G.R. No. 262941, penned by then Associate Justice Mario V. Lopez, decided on February 20, 2024.

This episode of the #SCphPodcast is also available on YouTube and the #SupremeCourtPH website.

What is the specific timeframe within which a case for cyber libel should be filed?

Listen to the latest episode of the Supreme Court Podcast with guest Court of Appeals Associate Justice Wilhelmina B. Jorge-Wagan, a member of the Supreme Court Special Committee on Cybercrime and Electronic Evidence, and a Professorial Lecturer at the Philippine Judicial Academy.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Justice Wagan discuss cyber libel, commonly referred to as online libel, within the context of the case of Berteni Cataluña Causing v. People of the Philippines, G.R. No. 258524, penned by Associate Justice Henri Jean Paul B. Inting, decided on October 11, 2023.

This episode of the #SCphPodcast is also available on YouTube and the #SupremeCourtPH website.

What key principles should we understand about the Writ of Habeas Data and the Writ of Kalikasan? How do these writs work in practice, and why were they introduced in the Philippine legal system? How do they empower citizens to assert their rights in the face of modern challenges, whether in the digital landscape or in the protection of our environment?

Listen to the latest episode of the Supreme Court Podcast with guest Atty. Tranquil Gervacio S. Salvador III, Dean of the School of Law and Jurisprudence of the Manila Adventist College, and Professorial Lecturer of the Philippine Judicial Academy.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Dean Salvador discuss the Writ of Habeas Data and the Writ of Kalikasan, two other protective legal remedies available in the Philippines, in the conclusion of the two-part episode on “Extraordinary Writs.”

This episode of the #SCphPodcast is also available on the #SupremeCourtPH website and YouTube.

What is Writ of Amparo, and why was it introduced in the Philippine legal system? How does it serve as a protective remedy to uphold an individual’s right to life, liberty, and security, especially in cases of threats, enforced disappearances, or extrajudicial killings?

Listen to the latest episode of the Supreme Court Podcast with guest Dean Tranquil Gervacio S. Salvador III, Dean of the School of Law and Jurisprudence of the Manila Adventist College, and Professorial Lecturer of the Philippine Judicial Academy.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Dean Salvador discuss the Writ of Amparo, one of the protective legal remedies available in the Philippines, in the first of a two-part episode on “Extraordinary Writs.”

This episode of the #SCphPodcast is also available onthe #SupremeCourtPH website and YouTube.

Supreme Court Associate Justice Amy C. Lazaro-Javier, Chairperson of the 2025 Bar Examinations, looks back on her Bar journey and shares her insights in #SCphPodcast Episode 85: Bar Lessons and Beyond.

How were the Bar Examinations during Justice Lazaro-Javier’s time different from today in terms of scope, the conduct of the exams and the release of the results? How important are the Bar Exams in shaping future lawyers? In today's world, why is it still important to be a lawyer? How does the profession remain relevant?

This episode of the #SCphPodcast is also available on the #SupremeCourtPH website and YouTube.

What is inordinate delay, and how does it affect a case in a legal proceeding? Under what conditions can inordinate delay cause a case to be dismissed, and how do courts evaluate such delays? How do courts ensure both due process for the accused and the state's right to fair prosecution?

Listen to the latest episode of the Supreme Court Podcast with guest Sandiganbayan Associate Justice Michael Frederick L. Musngi, who served as Bar Examiner in Remedial Law in 2022.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Justice Musngi discuss the concept of inordinate delay in legal proceedings within the context of the consolidated cases of Cesar Matas Cagang v. Sandiganbayan, et al., G.R. Nos. 206438 and 206458 and Cesar Matas Cagang v. Sandiganbayan, et al., G.R. Nos. 210141-42; penned by Senior Associate Justice Marvic M.V.F. Leonen, decided on July 31, 2018.

This episode of the #SCphPodcast is also available on the #SupremeCourtPH website and YouTube.

In graft cases, under what circumstances can shortcuts in public procurement or government procurements without public bidding be deemed justified, potentially leading to an acquittal?

Listen to the latest episode of the Supreme Court Podcast with guest Sandiganbayan Justice Michael Frederick L. Musngi, who served as Bar Examiner in Remedial Law in 2022.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Justice Musngi revisit the issue of procurement in government transactions and explore the circumstances under which shortcuts in public procurement may be considered within the context of the consolidated cases of Richard T. Martel et al. v. People of the Philippines, GR No. 224720-23, and Benjamin P. Bautista Jr. v. People of the Philippines, GR No. 224765-68, penned by Supreme Court Associate Justice Alfredo Benjamin S. Caguioa, decided on February 2, 2021.

This episode of the #SCphPodcast is also available on the #SupremeCourtPH website and YouTube.

Are judgments of acquittal final, or are there exceptions? Does the guarantee against double jeopardy preclude the Court from declaring a judgment of acquittal as void when it has been rendered in violation of the State's right to be heard and prosecute its case?

Listen to the latest episode of the Supreme Court Podcast with guest Court of Appeals Associate Justice Jaime Fortunato A. Caringal, a member of the Remedial Law Department of the Philippine Judiciary Academy.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Justice Caringal talk about the right against double jeopardy within the context of the case of the case of Manuel T. Ubarra, Jr., v. People of the Philippines, G. R. No. 249890, penned by Associate Justice Ramon Paul L. Hernando, decided on October 9, 2024.

This episode of the #SCphPodcast is also available on the #SupremeCourtPH website and YouTube.

What is an acquittal? On what grounds may an accused secure an acquittal, and what are the consequences of such an acquittal?

Listen to the latest episode of the Supreme Court Podcast with guest Court of Appeals Associate Justice Jaime Fortunato A. Caringal, a member of the Remedial Law Department of the Philippine Judiciary Academy.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Justice Caringal talk about acquittals in general and what are the possible grounds for an accused to be absolved of a crime within the context of the case of Roel Gementiza Padillo v. People of the Philippines, GR No. 271012, penned by Supreme Court Associate Justice Ramon Paul L. Hernando, decided on October 9, 2024.

This episode of the #SCphPodcast is also available on the #SupremeCourtPH website and YouTube.

What are the key differences between RA 7877 (Anti-Sexual Harassment Act) and RA 11313 (Safe Spaces Act) in how harassment is defined and who are protected? How do these laws vary in terms of accountability, legal remedies, and scope?

Listen to the latest episode of the Supreme Court Podcast with guest Judge Bernard P. Bernal, who also serves as a Professorial Lecturer at the Philippine Judicial Academy.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Judge Bernal discuss RA 7877, or the Anti-Sexual Harassment Act, vis-à-vis RA 11313, or the Safe Spaces Act, highlighting what sets them apart.

This episode of the #SCphPodcast is also available on the #SupremeCourtPH website and YouTube.

What acts constitute sexual harassment in a work environment, and do employers in the Philippines have a legal and moral obligation to prevent it? More importantly, can an employer’s failure to act on such complaints result to its liability for constructive dismissal?

Listen to the latest episode of the Supreme Court Podcast with guest Judge Bernard P. Bernal, who also serves as a Professorial Lecturer at the Philippine Judicial Academy.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Judge Bernal discuss the responsibility of employers in addressing sexual harassment complaints, and whether their failure to act promptly and sensitively to such complaints can lead to liability for constructive dismissal within the context of the case of LBC Express-VIS, Inc. v. Palco, G.R. No. 217101; penned by Supreme Court Senior Associate Justice Marvic M.V.F. Leonen and decided by the Court on February 12, 2020.

This episode of the #SCphPodcast is also available onthe #SupremeCourtPH website and YouTube.

What happens when a public official bypasses the public bidding requirement in a government transaction? Can negotiated procurement justify the disregard of public bidding, which is the default mode of procurement under the old law, Republic Act No. 9184?

Listen to the latest episode of the Supreme Court Podcast with guest Sandiganbayan Associate Justice Ma. Theresa Dolores C. Gomez-Estoesta, who also serves as a Professorial Lecturer at the Philippine Judicial Academy.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Justice Estoesta discuss the requirement of competitive public bidding in government procurements and its difference from negotiated procurement within the context of the case of People of the Philippines v. Jeorge Ejercito Estregan, G.R. No. 248699, penned by Supreme Court Associate Justice Ricardo R. Rosario, and decided on February 5, 2025.

This episode of the SCphPodcast is also available on the #SupremeCourtPH website and YouTube.

What violations do lawyers commit under the Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability (CPRA) when they forge court orders? Is disbarment an automatic and appropriate penalty for lawyers who falsify documents?

Listen to the latest episode of the Supreme Court Podcast with guest Sandiganbayan Associate Justice Ma. Theresa Dolores C. Gomez-Estoesta, Member of the Department of Ethics and Judicial Conduct of the Philippine Judicial Academy.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Justice Estoesta discuss what violations of the CPRA were committed by a lawyer who forged a court order within the context of the case of Judge Ray Alan T. Drilon and Atty. Corazon P. Romero v. Atty. Ariel D. Maglalang, A.C. No. 8471. This is a per curiam Decision of the Supreme Court En Banc promulgated on August 22, 2023.

This episode of the SCphPodcast is also available on the #SupremeCourtPH website and YouTube.

Does the incumbency and continuous discharge of duties of public officials in one locality preclude them from validly acquiring a new domicile in another locality to satisfy the residency requirement under the Local Government Code?

More importantly, is it time for the Supreme Court to revisit the second placer rule to determine who should serve the remaining term of a winning candidate whose certificate of candidacy (COC) has been cancelled and who has been disqualified?

Listen to the latest episode of the Supreme Court Podcast with guest Philippine Judicial Academy (PHILJA) lecturer and former Commission on Elections (COMELEC) Commissioner, Atty. Luie Tito F. Guia.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Atty. Guia discuss several very important issues in the Philippine elections: the concept of domicile, false material representation in the COC as a ground for its cancellation, and the second placer rule within the context of Datu Pax Ali S. Mangudadatu v. The Commission on Elections, et al., G.R. Nos. 260219 & 260231, penned by Supreme Court Associate Justice Samuel H. Gaerlan and decided by the Court En Banc on April 22, 2025.

This episode of the Supreme Court Podcast is also available on the SC website.

How has the Philippine judiciary contributed to protecting the rights of refugees and stateless persons?

Listen to the latest episode of the Supreme Court Podcast with guests Atty. Maria Ermina Valdeavilla-Gallardo, Head of the Philippines Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees; Judge Maria Josefina G. San Juan-Torres, Member of the Supreme Court Special Committee on the Facilitated Naturalization for Refugees and Stateless Individuals; and Mr. Jalal Aboughaula, a naturalized Filipino citizen and former refugee.

In the final installment of this two-part episode, Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo, Judge Torres, and Atty. Gallardo discuss A.M. No. 21-07-22-SC or the Rule on Facilitated Naturalization of Refugees and Stateless Persons, and its impact on the naturalization process. Mr. Aboughaula, for his part, shares his own experience.

This episode of the Supreme Court Podcast is also available on the SC website.

Why does the world observe World Refugee Day, and what relevance does it have for Filipinos today?

Listen to the latest episode of the Supreme Court Podcast with guests Atty. Maria Ermina Valdeavilla-Gallardo, Head of the Philippines Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees; Judge Maria Josefina G. San Juan-Torres, Member of the Supreme Court Special Committee on the Facilitated Naturalization forRefugees and Stateless Individuals; and Mr. Jalal Aboughaula, a naturalized Filipino citizen and former refugee.

In the first of this two-part episode, Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo, Judge Torres, and Atty. Gallardo discuss key concepts related to refugees and stateless persons, as well as the significance of celebratingWorld Refugee Day. Mr. Aboughaula, for his part, shares his own personal experience.

This episode of the Supreme Court Podcast is also available on the SC website.

What can we look forward to in the future of the Supreme Court? What does the youth of today need to understand about its vital role in safeguarding justice and the rule of law?

Listen to the latest episode of the Supreme Court Podcast with guest Supreme Court Spokesperson Atty. Camille Sue Mae L. Ting.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Atty. Ting discuss the institution they serve―the Supreme Court―its history, some significant rulings, and the Strategic Plan for Judicial Innovations 2022-2027 (SPJI). The Court celebrated its 124th anniversary on June 11, 2025.

This episode of the Supreme Court Podcast is also available on the SC website.

Are foreign currency deposit accounts exempt from estate tax under the Foreign Currency Deposit Act of the Philippines?

Listen to the latest episode of the Supreme Court Podcast with guest Court of Tax Appeals (CTA) Associate Justice Jean Marie A. Bacorro-Villena, Member of the Department of Taxation Law of the Philippine Judicial Academy.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and CTA Justice Bacorro-Villena discuss whether foreign currency deposits covered by the Foreign Currency Deposit Act of the Philippines are exempt from estate taxwithin the context of the case of Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Estate of Mr. Charles Marvin Romig, represented by its sole heir Maricel Narciso Romig, G.R. No. 262092, penned by Associate Justice Ramon Paul L. Hernando, anddecided on October 9, 2024.

This episode of the Supreme Court Podcast is also available on the SC website.

Is an assessment for deficiency taxes a prerequisite for the collection of the civil liability of the taxpayer-accused of unpaid taxes in the criminal prosecution for tax law violations?

Listen to the latest episode of the Supreme Court Podcast with guest Court of Tax Appeals (CTA) Associate Justice Jean Marie A. Bacorro-Villena, Member of the Department of Taxation Law of the Philippine Judicial Academy.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and CTA Justice Bacorro-Villena discuss whether there is a need for the issuance of a deficiency tax assessment before the government can collect the civil liability for unpaid taxes from the taxpayer-accused in a criminal case for tax violations within the context of the consolidated cases of People of the Philippines v. Joel C. Mendez, G.R. Nos. 208310-11 and Joel C. Mendez v. People of the Philippines, G.R. No. 208662, penned by Associate Justice Mario V. Lopez, and decided by the Supreme Court on March 28, 2023.

This episode of the Supreme Court Podcast is also available on the SC website.

How does the Judicial and Bar Council (JBC) conduct the screening and nomination of candidates for the Judiciary, and how does it ensure that the process is transparent and merit-based?

Listen to the latest episode of the Supreme Court Podcast with guest Atty. Nesauro H. Firme, JBC Regular Member representing the Academe.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Atty. Firme discuss the role of the JBC, with a focus on its constitutional mandate to recommend appointees to the Judiciary through a transparent and merit-based selection process.

What are the responsibilities and obligations of a lawyer authorized to be a notary public?

Listen to the latest episode of the Supreme Court Podcast with guest Court of Appeals (CA) Associate Justice Geraldine C. Fiel-Macaraig, Vice Chairperson of the Department of Ethics and Judicial Conduct of the Philippine Judicial Academy.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and CA Justice Fiel-Macaraig discuss the duties and ethical obligations a lawyer assume as a notary public within the context of the case of Re: Resolution* Dated August 30, 2017 in OMB-C-C-13-0357, etc., v. Atty. Editha P. Talaboc, Atty. Delfin R. Agcaoili, Jr., and Atty. Mark S. Oliveros, A.C. No. 11889, penned by Associate Justice Ricardo R. Rosario and decided by the Court on November 13, 2024.

This episode of the Supreme Court Podcast is also available on Spotify and on the SC website.

Should lawyers be held administratively liable for issuing checks that are dishonored due to insufficient funds or due to a closed account?

Listen to the latest episode of the Supreme Court Podcast with guest Court of Appeals (CA) Associate Justice Geraldine C. Fiel-Macaraig, Vice Chairperson of the Department of Ethics and Judicial Conduct of the Philippine Judicial Academy.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and CA Justice Fiel-Macaraig discuss whether lawyers are administratively liable for issuing bouncing checks, within the context of the case of William S. Uy v. Atty. Elerizza A. Libiran-Meteoro, A.C. No. 13368, decided on May 21, 2024.

Listen to the latest episode of the Supreme Court Podcast with guest Undersecretary Filemon Ray Javier, Head of the Legal and Legislative Affairs Strand of the Department of Education and Labor Law and Social Legislations Bar Examiner for the 2024 Bar Examinations.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Usec. Javier discuss the illegal dismissal of a person living with HIV in the case of Bison Management Corporation v. AAA (G.R. No. 256540, February 14, 2024), penned by Justice Alfredo Benjamin S. Caguioa, and the illegal suspension of a teacher who got pregnant out of wedlock in Bohol Wisdom School v. Mabao (G.R. No. 252124, July 23, 2024), penned by Justice Ricardo R. Rosario.

Are fitness trainers and delivery riders of an online selling platform regular employees?

What defines an employer-employee relationship? What is a regular employee and under what circumstances is a dismissal considered illegal?

Listen to the latest episode of the Supreme Court Podcast with guest Undersecretary Filemon Ray Javier, Head of the Legal and Legislative Affairs Strand of the Department of Education and Labor Law and Social Legislations Bar Examiner for the 2024 Bar Examinations.

Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Usec. Javier discuss labor disputes with focus on the definition of employer-employee relationship and the criteria that classify an individual as a regular employee within the context of the cases of Rogelio Garalde Mendaros, et al. v. Lazada E-Services Phil., Inc, G.R. No. 257821, decided on August 19, 2024, penned by Supreme Court Associate Justice Henri Jean Paul B. Inting, and Rico B. Escauriaga, et al. v. Fitness First, Phil., Inc. and Liberty Cruz, G.R. No. 266552, decided on January 22, 2024, penned by Supreme Court Associate Amy C. Lazaro-Javier.

This episode of the Supreme Court Podcast is also available on Spotify and on the SC website by clicking on the link in the bio.

How do you examine a child witness in court? Can courts allow the statement of a witness to be presented as evidence in place of direct testimony?

Listen to the latest episode of the Supreme Court Podcast. Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Atty. Ray Paolo J. Santiago, Member of the Philippine Judicial Academy’s Department of Humanitarian Law and Human Rights, discuss the examination of a child witness within the context of the Supreme Court Decision in the case of People v. XXX258054, G.R. No. 258054, decided on October 25, 2023, penned by Supreme Court Associate Justice Mario V. Lopez.

This episode of the Supreme Court Podcast is also available on the SC website.

The practice of the law is a privilege, not a right. Under what circumstances can the ultimate penalty of disbarment be imposed against lawyers?

Listen to the latest episode of the Supreme Court Podcast. Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Atty. Ray Paolo J. Santiago, Member of the Philippine Judicial Academy’s Department of Humanitarian Law and Human Rights, discuss when the ultimate penalty of disbarment is imposed against a member of the Bar within the context of the Supreme Court En Banc Decision in the case of In Re: Atty. Lorenzo G. Gadon’s viral video against Raissa Robles, A.C. No. 13521. The per curiam Decision was promulgated on June 27, 2023.

This episode of the Supreme Court Podcast is also available on Spotify and on the SC website.

What is Gender-Fair Language in the Judiciary and Gender-Fair Courtroom Etiquette? Why should Members of the Bench and the Bar be mindful of using such language?

Listen to the latest episode of the Supreme Court Podcast. Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Atty. Blessilda Abad-Gamo, Member of the Philippine Judicial Academy’s Department of Legal Writing, Research, and Methodology, discuss the importance of using of Gender-Fair Language in court proceedings as reiterated by the Supreme Court in the case of Aiko Yokogawa-Tan v. Jonnell Tan and the Republic of the Philippines, G.R. No. 254646, decided by the Second Division of the Supreme Court on October 23, 2023, through Senior Associate Justice Marvic M.V.F. Leonen.

What are the salient provisions of A.M. No. 24-02-06-SC or The Rule on Family Mediation? How will this Rule benefit families and the courts?

Listen to the latest episode of the Supreme Court Podcast. Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Court of Appeals Associate Justice Angelene Mary W. Quimpo-Sale, Member of the Supreme Court Committee on Family Courts and Juvenile Concerns and Chairperson of the said Committee’s Sub-Technical Working Group on Rule on Family Mediation, discuss The Rule on Family Mediation which was approved by the SC En Banc on November 5, 2024.

This episode of the Supreme Court Podcast is also available on Spotify and on the SC website.

Chief Justice Alexander G. Gesmundo shares his insights and updates on the Strategic Plan for Judicial Innovations 2022-2027 (SPJI), along with his vision for the Judiciary and plans for the remainder of his tenure.

Listen to the latest episode of the Supreme Court Podcast. This special episode features the interview of Chief Justice Alexander G. Gesmundo by Supreme Court Spokesperson Atty. Camille Sue Mae L. Ting on SPJI. The said interview waspresented at the recently concluded Philippine Women Judges Association’s 2025 Annual Convention, held at the Manila Hotel from March 5 to 7, 2025.

This episode of the Supreme Court Podcast is also available on the SC website.

When is the use of force by a police officer against a person under arrest deemed reasonable or excessive, potentially resulting in penalties for the arresting officer?

Listen to the latest episode of the Supreme Court Podcast. In the conclusion of this two-part episode on drugs cases, Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Court of Appeals Justice Raymond Reynold R. Lauigan, Member of the Philippine Judicial Academy’s Department of Criminal Law, discuss how the use of excessive force by an arresting officer during a buy-bust operation led to his suspension within the context of the case of Herminio A. Besmonte v. National Police Commission-National Capital Region, G.R. No. 260148, decided by the Supreme Court on April 3, 2024 through Supreme Court Associate Justice Samuel H. Gaerlan.

This episode of the Supreme Court Podcast is also available on Spotify and on the SC website.

Listen to the latest episode of the Supreme Court Podcast. Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Court of Appeals Justice Raymond Reynold R. Lauigan, Member of the Philippine Judicial Academy’s Department of Criminal Law, discuss when a plea bargain in drugs cases should be allowed or disallowed by a trial court within the context of the case of Erwin Alvero v. People of the Philippines, G.R. No. 260214, decided by the Supreme Court Third Division on April 17, 2023, through Associate Justice Maria Filomena D. Singh.

This episode of the Supreme Court Podcast is also available on Spotify and on the SC website.

Can a father be allowed to apply for protection and custody orders under the Anti-Violence against Women and Their Children Act of 2004 (Anti-VAWC Act) against a mother who committed violence against their child?

Listen to the latest episode of the Supreme Court Podcast. In the conclusion of this two-part episode, Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Judge Maria Josefina G. San Juan-Torres, Professorial Lecturer and Member of the Philippine Judicial Academy Departments of Special Areas of Concern and Family Law, discuss child abuse, this time under RA 9262 or the Anti-VAWC Act and within the context of the case of Knutson v. Judge Sarmiento-Flores, G.R. No. 239215, decided on July 12, 2022 and penned by Supreme Court Associate Justice Mario V. Lopez.

This episode of the Supreme Court Podcast is also available on Spotify and on the SC website.

Can excessive discipline, which sometimes results in physical injury, be considered outright as child abuse?

Listen to the latest episode of the Supreme Court Podcast. In the first of this two-part episode, Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Judge Maria Josefina G. San Juan-Torres, Professorial Lecturer and Member of the Philippine Judicial Academy Departments of Special Areas of Concern and Family Law, discuss child abuse resulting from excessive discipline that harms or undermines a child’s dignity in the context of the case of XXX v. People, G.R. No. 268457, decided by the Supreme Court on July 22, 2024, penned Associate Justice Jhosep Y. Lopez.

You may also listen to the episode on Spotify and on the SC website by clicking on the Podcasts link in the bio.

Should the Constitutional prohibition on the appointment to government positions within one year from the election be applied to all losing candidates, regardless of the position and the place or jurisdiction of the office where they are appointed?

Listen to the latest episode of the Supreme Court Podcast. In the conclusion of this two-part election episode, Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Atty. Luie Tito F. Guia, Member of the Philippine Judicial Academy Department of Constitutional Law and former Commissioner of the Commission on Elections, discuss the one-year appointment ban on losing candidates in the context of the case of Macalino v. Commission on Audit, G. R. No. 253199, decided on November 14, 2023, penned by Associate Justice Jose Midas P. Marquez.

Suppose nominees of a party-list group withdraw their nominations, who can substitute and until when is the substitution of a nominee allowed by the Commission on Elections?

Listen to the latest episode of the Supreme Court Podcast. In the first of this two-part election episode, Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Atty. Luie Tito F. Guia, Member of the Philippine Judicial Academy Department of Constitutional Law and former Commissioner of the Commission on Elections, discuss the rule on substitution of election candidates particularly among party-list groups in the context of the case of Duterte Youth v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 261123, decided on August 20, 2024, penned by Associate Justice Ricardo R. Rosario.

Listen to the latest episode of the Supreme Court Podcast. Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Dean Ma. Soledad Deriquito-Mawis, Member of the Philippine Judicial Academy Department of Civil Law and Dean of the College of Law of Lyceum of the Philippines University, discuss substitute parental authority in the context of the cases of G.R. No. 234660, Spouses Gabun v. Stolk, Jr., decided on June 26, 2023, penned by Associate Justice Antonio Kho, Jr. and G.R. No. 235498, Masbate v. Relucio, decided on July 30, 2018, penned by Senior Associate Justice Estela Perlas-Bernabe.

You may also listen to the episode on Spotify and on the SC website.

In search warrants, how crucial is the exact location of the premises to be searched?

Listen to the latest episode of the Supreme Court Podcast. In the second of this two-part episode, Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Atty. Ted Te, Chairperson of the Philippine Judicial Academy Department of Humanitarian Law and Human Rights and former Supreme Court Public Information Office Chief, continue to discuss search warrants, what information needs to be specified and the implications if these are omitted in the context of People v. Lucky Enriquez, G.R. No. 264473, August 7, 2024.

Suppose you were arrested during an implementation of a search warrant which led to the discovery of alleged illegal drugs. You questioned the basis for the issuance of the search warrant. But the judge refused to release the records of the case. You go all the way to the Supreme Court. Can you compel the judge to show you the basis for the issuance of the search warrant?

Listen to the latest episode of the Supreme Court Podcast. In the first of this two-part episode, Supreme Court Chief Communications Officer Atty. Mike Navallo and Atty. Ted Te, Chairperson of the Philippine Judicial Academy Department of Humanitarian Law and Human Rights and former Supreme Court Public Information Office Chief, discuss what is a search warrant and the basis for its issuance in the context of G.R. No. 226993, Zafe III and Zafe v. People.

In 2024, the Supreme Court disposed of 4,294 cases, with a clearance rate of 87% and a disposition rate of 22%.

Listen to the latest episode of the Supreme Court Podcast, as SC Spokesperson Atty. Camille Sue Mae L. Ting discusses the significant decisions in 2024 that the Supreme Court promulgated pursuant to its power of adjudication.

Listen to the latest episode of the Supreme Court Podcast, which discusses the case of G.R. Nos. 249027 and 249155, Guinto v. DOJ and Inmates of New Bilibid Prison v. DOJ.

Suppose you were a nurse hired on a probationary basis, but before the six month period ended, and despite obtaining passing marks, you were fired by the hospital. Can you claim illegal dismissal and up to what extent can you claim back wages?

Listen to the latest episode of the Supreme Court Podcast, which discusses the case of G.R. No. 228357, C.P. Reyes Hospital and Angelina Reyes versus Geraldine Barbosa.

Suppose you were a supporter of a  candidate running for public office. In your enthusiasm, you posted campaign posters on the gate of your house and the COMELEC took them away. What are the guidelines for posting campaign materials in private properties?

Listen Episode 48 of the Supreme Court Podcast, which discusses the case of GR 258805, St. Anthony College of Roxas City, Inc. v. COMELEC.

Suppose you marry a foreigner. You and your spouse move abroad and decide to mutually divorce. Can you have this divorce decree recognized here in the Philippines?

Listen to the latest episode of the Supreme Court Podcast, which discusses the case of GR 249238, Republic v. Ng.

Spotify:

Supreme Court website: https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/podcasts/

#SupremeCourtPH

#SCphPodcast

Suppose your new neighbor takes over a forest land, fences it up, makes some improvements. You’re concerned this may lead to environmental degradation. Is there anything you can do about it?

Listen to the latest episode of the Supreme Court Podcast, which discusses the case of G.R. Nos. 252834 and 258836, Spouses Robles v. Timario.

A group of journalists and election observers were asking the Commission on Elections for transparency in the conduct of the 2022 automated polls. They were advocating for the use of digital signatures and asked the poll body to observe the printing of ballots, examine the SD cards and vote counting machines, and that they be given access to the technical hubs, servers, and data centers. To what extent can they compel COMELEC to allow their request?

A tripartite agreement between State-owned corporations of three countries for the conduct of a seismic survey in an area in the South China Sea is voided by the Supreme Court for violating the Constitution. What can be considered exploration of natural resources, who can be authorized to do it, and what are the limitations?

What is red-tagging and what remedies are available to its victims?

Listen to the latest episode of the Supreme Court Podcast, which discusses the cases of G.R. No. 254753, Deduro v. Maj. Gen. Vinoya.

A father is accused of raping his 8-year old daughter. What charges can be filed against him and why is the proper name of the charge important?

In this episode, we discuss the difference between qualified and statutory rape, and the evolution of the laws on rape in the Philippines.

Listen to the latest episode of the Supreme Court Podcast, which discusses the cases of G.R. Nos. G.R. No. 260708, People v. ABC 260708.

You may also listen to previous SC Podcast episodes on Spotify and at the Supreme Court website: https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/podcasts/

#SupremeCourtPH

#SCphPodcast

What happens if you are invited to a Senate hearing and refuse to answer questions? Can you be cited in contempt and ordered arrested by the Senate?

Listen to the latest episode of the Supreme Court Podcast, which discusses the cases of G.R. Nos. G.R. Nos. 257401 and 257916, Ong v. Senate and Ming v. Senate.

You may also listen to previous SC Podcast episodes on Spotify and at the Supreme Court website: https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/podcasts/

#SupremeCourtPH

#SCphPodcast

How do we know who are nuisance candidates? Are unpopular or unaffiliated candidates or those without resources necessarily nuisance candidates?

What happens when a lawyer secures a fake judgment supposedly nullifying a clients marriage?

Can the COMELEC cancel a party-list’s registration around 10 years after failing to comply with election laws? Listen to the latest episode of the Supreme Court Podcast, which discusses the case of An Waray Party-List v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 268546. #SupremeCourtPH#SCphPodcast