The Smerconish Podcast

Today's Poll Question at Smerconish.com: UFC: Sport or Spectacle? With UFC preparing for an unprecedented event on the White House South Lawn, Michael examines the evolution of mixed martial arts from a once-marginalized attraction derided as “human cockfighting” to a global entertainment powerhouse. He reflects on Dana White’s role in building the UFC brand, the organization’s long relationship with Donald Trump, and the growing mainstream acceptance of MMA. Are UFC fighters elite athletes competing in a demanding sport, or is the appeal rooted primarily in spectacle? Listen here then cast your ballot.

The 2026 FIFA World Cup is here, and the United States is hosting the largest sporting event on the planet. Michael speaks with Andrew Giuliani, Executive Director of the White House FIFA World Cup Task Force, about security, logistics, President Trump's involvement, and why he believes Team USA could make a historic run. Then, Philadelphia World Cup host committee co-chair Dan Hilferty joins the conversation to discuss the economic impact, fan experience, and what visitors can expect when the tournament arrives. A wide-ranging discussion about soccer's growth in America, global sports, and the opportunities—and challenges—of hosting the world's game. Original air date 11 June 2026.

Today's Poll Question at Smerconish.com: When attacked, should the U.S. respond proportionally or overwhelmingly? As tensions between the United States and Iran continue to escalate, Michael examines one of the oldest and most consequential questions in foreign policy: when America is attacked, should it strike back in kind or with overwhelming force? Drawing on recent developments in the Gulf, President Trump’s response strategy, a memorable scene from The West Wing, and a provocative Wall Street Journal editorial, Michael explores the competing arguments for restraint and escalation. Listen here, then vote.

Michael Smerconish talks with Mark Halperin about the controversy surrounding Scott Pelley's exit from CBS News, questions of media bias at 60 Minutes, and President Trump's evolving strategy toward Iran. A timely discussion on journalism, politics, and international tensions. Original air date 10 June 2026.

Today's Poll Question at Smerconish.com: Which would you rather watch: baseball or soccer? As the FIFA World Cup kicks off across the United States, Canada, and Mexico, Michael explores how dramatically soccer’s standing has changed in America. Once dismissed as a niche sport, soccer has climbed to become one of the nation’s most popular spectator sports—according to recent data, even edging past baseball. Michael shares fascinating World Cup logistics, from team base camps and travel challenges to Philadelphia’s role as a host city, while revisiting a memorable 1986 speech from Jack Kemp that captured America’s former skepticism toward the game. Has soccer truly surpassed the national pastime? Listen here, then vote!

Former NATO Supreme Allied Commander Admiral James Stavridis joins Michael to break down the increasingly complicated dynamics between Israel, Iran, Hezbollah, and the Trump administration. Are President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu pursuing different goals? Can a U.S.-Iran deal still happen? And what role does Hezbollah play in the growing tensions across the region? Then, Michael talks with listeners on whether the U.S. and Israel are drifting apart, the challenges of Middle East diplomacy, and a provocative question from listeners: who’s the tougher partner—Trump or Netanyahu? Original air date 9 June 2026.

Today's Poll Question at Smerconish.com: Are America's best days ahead or behind us? Michael examines a deceptively simple question that cuts to the heart of America’s national mood. Drawing on new Quinnipiac and AP-NORC polling, he explores a striking contradiction: most Americans believe the country is falling short of its founding ideals, yet more say America’s best days are still ahead than behind. Why do so many remain proud to be American while expressing deep concerns about the nation’s direction? Michael breaks down the numbers, the partisan divide, and what these results reveal about optimism, patriotism, and the future of the United States as it approaches its 250th anniversary. Listen here, then vote - and please rate, review and share this podcast!

Can sharing a meal bring people together in an increasingly divided America? Michael sits down with Anuj Gupta, President and CEO of Philadelphia's Welcoming Center, to discuss "Breaking Bread, Breaking Barriers," an innovative initiative that uses food and conversation to build community across cultural, political, and social divides. After the interview, Michael and TC explore the lessons behind the project before listeners weigh in on what makes a good neighbor, a strong community, and meaningful citizenship. From shared meals to simple greetings, this episode examines whether small acts of connection can help bridge our growing social disconnect. Original air date 8 June 2026.

Today's Poll Question at Smerconish.com: Should 60 Minutes' Scott Pelley have been fired for humiliating his boss in front of coworkers? Michael examines the controversy surrounding veteran 60 Minutes correspondent Scott Pelley and his dismissal following a tense staff meeting with new leadership. After reviewing reporting, audio accounts, and Pelley's own interview with The New York Times, Michael argues that one key question has been overlooked: exactly what was said in the room that led to the firing? He breaks down the confrontation, the broader battle over CBS News' future, and whether Pelley's conduct amounted to protected dissent or clear-cut insubordination. Cast your vote and decide for yourself.

President Trump has named housing executive Bill Pulte as Acting Director of National Intelligence, a move that's drawing scrutiny from both national security experts and lawmakers. Michael examines the nomination, the qualifications traditionally required for the DNI role, and whether Republican resistance to some of Trump's recent actions signals a broader shift within the party. Former White House counterterrorism advisor Richard Clarke joins the program to explain what the DNI actually does, why the position was created after 9/11, and why Pulte's appointment has raised concerns inside the intelligence community. Original air date 3 June 2026.

Today's Poll Question at Smerconish.com: Should Representative Tom Kean Jr.’s three-month unexplained absence disqualify him from re-election? Michael examines the growing controversy surrounding New Jersey Congressman Tom Kean Jr., who has not cast a vote in Congress since March 5 and has largely disappeared from public view. In this episode, Michael explores the tension between respecting a potential health crisis and demanding accountability from an elected official. If Kean is facing a serious medical or mental health challenge, how much privacy should he be afforded? And at what point do voters have a right to insist on active representation? A thoughtful conversation about transparency, compassion, public service, and democratic responsibility.

President Trump recently suggested that a proposed $1.8 billion compensation fund for alleged victims of government "weaponization" may not be dead after all. Listen here as Michael is joined by attorneys Michael Van Der Veen and William Brennan, who represented Donald Trump during his second impeachment trial and later defended numerous January 6 defendants. They argue that many January 6 participants were overcharged, politically targeted, and suffered devastating personal and financial consequences. Smerconish challenges their claims, presses them on comparisons to the George Floyd protests, and asks whether compensation for January 6 defendants is justified—or politically motivated itself. Original air date 4 June 2026.

Today's Poll Question at Smerconish.com: Does Congress limiting Trump's Iran war powers benefit the US or Iran? Michael Smerconish examines the House vote to limit President Trump’s authority to continue military hostilities against Iran without explicit congressional approval. With four Republicans joining Democrats, the debate revives longstanding questions about the War Powers Act, presidential authority, and Congress’s constitutional role in matters of war. Smerconish argues that while concerns about the administration’s rationale for entering the conflict remain valid, the timing of the vote may send an unintended signal to Tehran. As the fragile ceasefire holds, costs mount, and political pressure grows at home, is Congress protecting constitutional balance—or giving Iran exactly what it wants: more time? Listen...ponder...vote!

Michael welcomes political analyst Mark Halperin for a wide-ranging conversation on whether Republican resistance to Donald Trump signals a genuine turning point inside the GOP. They discuss the collapse of Trump's proposed anti-weaponization fund, growing tensions between the White House and congressional Republicans, key 2026 races in California, Iowa, and Maine. Plus, a look at emerging 2028 Democratic contenders and the political stories shaping the road ahead. Original air date 3 June 2026.

Today's Poll Question at Smerconish.com: Is the Republican fight against Trump's $1.8 billion fund a one-off or a turning point? Michael examines the collapse of a proposed $1.8 billion Justice Department compensation fund tied to claims of government “weaponization” and asks whether Republican opposition marks a meaningful shift in Trump-era politics. While acknowledging Trump’s legitimate grievance over the illegal leak of his tax returns, Michael explores why many GOP lawmakers viewed the fund as a bridge too far. Featuring remarks from Congressman Brian Fitzpatrick and analysis of the behind-the-scenes pressure campaign that killed the proposal, this episode considers whether Republicans have finally found a willingness to challenge their own president—or whether this was simply an isolated exception.

"Good Fences Make Good Neighbors" - but a "good fence" isn't necessarily a tall one. Why are white picket fences disappearing across America? Michael explores a surprising cultural shift with Washington Post reporter Danielle Paquette. As privacy fences replace open yards, what are we gaining—and what might we be losing when it comes to community, trust, and neighborly connection? Original air date 2 June 2026.

Today's Poll Question at Smerconish.com: Trump versus Netanyahu - If you had to stand with one and neither is not an option, who do you stand with? Michael examines reports of a heated phone call between President Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, a dramatic turn for two leaders long seen as close political allies. Drawing on reporting about tensions over Iran negotiations, Israel’s actions in Lebanon, and the broader geopolitical stakes, Michael explores how the relationship may be changing—and why both men are facing political challenges at home. The result is one of the most difficult daily poll questions yet: if forced to choose between Trump and Netanyahu, where would you stand? Listen here, then vote.

Michael Cohen joins Michael Smerconish for a candid conversation about political tribalism, ideological purity tests, and what happens when independent thinkers refuse to stay in line. Cohen discusses his split with former allies on the left, why he says he was "canceled" for challenging anti-Trump narratives, and his reaction to ongoing questions about Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein. He also reveals that, despite years of conflict, he still seeks closure with the former president. A wide-ranging discussion about loyalty, truth, and the growing pressure to choose sides in American politics. Original air date 1 June 2026.

Today's Poll Question at Smerconish.com: Graham Platner’s wife says his sexting other women is nobody’s business. Do you agree with that? Michael examines the growing controversy surrounding the Maine Senate candidate whose campaign has been rocked by revelations about past conduct, including allegations of sexting during his marriage. After Platner’s wife publicly defended him and argued that their marriage is a private matter, Michael asks where voters should draw the line between personal behavior and public accountability. Cast your vote at Smerconish.com, and be sure to rate, review and share this podcast!

Michael Smerconish is joined by political analyst Mark Halperin to unpack Ken Paxton’s decisive Texas primary victory, what it means for the 2026 Senate landscape, and whether Democrats truly have a shot at a statewide breakthrough. They also discuss President Trump’s calculus in backing Paxton, the challenges facing Democrat James Talarico, and the growing uncertainty surrounding U.S.-Iran relations. Original air date 29 May 2026.

Today's Poll Question at Smerconish.com: Is Graham Platner's Nazi tattoo disqualifying? As Democrats search for four Senate seats to reclaim the majority, Maine has emerged as one of the most important battlegrounds in the country. Michael examines the high-stakes race between longtime Republican Senator Susan Collins and Democratic challenger Graham Platner, a Marine Corps veteran whose campaign has been rocked by revelations about controversial Reddit posts and a tattoo resembling a Nazi-era symbol. Platner says he was unaware of its meaning when he got it and has since covered it up, but critics argue that explanation strains credibility. Does the controversy end the conversation—or should voters weigh the full context before deciding? Listen in, and please rate, review, and share this podcast!

Michael explores how America’s political polarization is spilling into the jury room. Expert jury consultant Dr. Laurie Kuslansky joins the program to discuss rising mistrials, partisan bias among jurors, the impact of Trump-era politics on the justice system, and whether fair and impartial juries are becoming harder to find. Plus, listeners share their own surprising jury duty experiences. Original air date 28 May 2026.

Today's Poll Question at Smerconish.com: Do you believe Jill Biden was blindsided by Joe's debate performance? Michael revisits Joe Biden’s disastrous 2024 debate performance in light of Jill Biden’s new comments that she was “frightened” and had never seen him that way before OR since. He walks through the warning signs that came before the debate—from the Robert Hur report to the Hollywood fundraiser with Barack Obama and George Clooney—and asks whether the former first lady’s claim is credible. Michael also addresses concerns about Donald Trump’s health, drawing a contrast between fair scrutiny and political weaponization. Listen here, then cast your vote at Smerconish.com!

Michael speaks with University of Chicago political scientist Dr. Robert Pape about the growing conflict with Iran, rising oil prices, and the strategic dangers of what Pape calls the “Escalation Trap.” From the Strait of Hormuz to the risks of ground operations and global economic fallout, Pape argues the U.S. may have underestimated both Iran’s capabilities and the long-term consequences of military escalation.

Michael examines today’s poll question: Should the U.S. lift sanctions on Iran before its nuclear program is dismantled? With Trump weighing a possible deal, Republicans divided, and fears growing over America’s leverage, Michael breaks down the political, military, and economic stakes — including insights from Admiral Stavridis and the Wall Street Journal editorial board.

Michael talks with Admiral James Stavridis about escalating tensions with Iran, the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, and the future of AI-assisted warfare. Prompted by Pope Leo’s warning about autonomous weapons, Michael asks whether artificial intelligence will ultimately make war more precise and humane—or easier to wage.

Michael traces an unexpected through line from his very first talk radio show in 1993 — centered on a papal encyclical — to Pope Leo XIV’s new warning about artificial intelligence and modern warfare. The Pope argues AI could make war easier to wage and harder to control, while supporters say AI-driven targeting may actually reduce civilian casualties and battlefield mistakes. Michael explores the ethical tension between technological precision and moral responsibility, including the growing role of autonomous systems, Palantir, and algorithmic warfare. Is AI removing dangerous human emotion from combat — or making conflict dangerously impersonal?

Today's Poll Question at Smerconish.com: Which song best defines America? On this Memorial Day edition, Michael Smerconish explores a deeply personal and surprisingly revealing question inspired by President Obama’s latest reflections on music and national identity: which song best captures the American experience? From “This Land Is Your Land” and “We Shall Overcome” to “Fortunate Son,” “What’s Going On,” and “The Message,” Obama’s selections highlight protest, struggle, and social change. But Michael makes the case for a different classic altogether — Frank Sinatra’s “The House I Live In” — and uncovers the extraordinary backstory behind the song and its writers. A thoughtful conversation about patriotism, music, memory, and what binds Americans together. Listen here, then vote at Smerconish.com, and be sure to rate, review and share this podcast.

Media mogul Byron Allen joins Michael to discuss the end of The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, the launch of Comics Unleashed in CBS late night, and his remarkable journey from teenage comedian to media empire builder. Allen shares stories about Johnny Carson, David Letterman, Jay Leno, his mother’s influence, and why he believes comedy can bring America together.

Today's Poll Question at Smerconish.com: Does political comedy make you more or less likely to watch late night television? Stephen Colbert signs off after more than a decade hosting The Late Show, triggering debate over whether political comedy helped sustain late night television or accelerated its decline. Michael examines CBS’s explanation that the show was losing tens of millions annually, the political backlash surrounding Colbert’s exit, and the larger question of whether audiences still want partisan humor as part of their nightly routine. He also shares highlights from his interview with media mogul Byron Allen, who is taking over the time slot with a comedy-first approach deliberately free of politics. Can late night succeed again by simply trying to make people laugh?

Michael Smerconish welcomes Mark Halperin for a wide-ranging conversation on the latest political flashpoints: the controversy surrounding potential compensation for January 6 defendants, growing Republican resistance to Donald Trump, tensions with Iran, and Trump’s public feud with Congressman Brian Fitzpatrick. Halperin explains why some GOP lawmakers may finally be willing to push back — and what it could mean heading into the midterms. Plus, Michael reflects on the legacy and final political warnings of the late Barney Frank. Original air date 21 May 2026.

Today's Poll Question at Smerconish.com: Before his death, Barney Frank said overreach by the left is alienating moderates and setting back Democrats. Do you agree? Michael reflects on the life and political legacy of Barney Frank, the pioneering congressman and liberal icon who, in his final interviews, warned that Democrats risk alienating mainstream voters through ideological overreach and rigid litmus tests. Drawing from past conversations with Frank, Michael explores the late lawmaker’s argument that successful political movements require strategy, sequencing, and coalition-building — not purity tests. The episode also revisits Frank’s wit, groundbreaking role in Congress, and his candid assessment of today’s Democratic Party at a pivotal political moment. Listen here, then vote!

Michael and TC revisit some of the most memorable commencement speeches from both this year and years past — from Roger Federer, Steve Jobs, Shonda Rhimes, Steve Carell, Eric Church, Arthur Brooks, and more. From lessons on resilience and rejection to purpose, kindness, ambition, and community, they break down the advice that resonated most with graduates — and why these messages matter far beyond campus. Plus: AI gets booed at graduations, universities navigate speech controversies, and Michael reflects on the power of rejection in his own commencement addresses. A thoughtful, funny, and surprisingly emotional conversation about success, failure, and what actually makes a meaningful life. Original air date 19 May 2026.

Today's Poll Question at Smerconish.com: When you vote, which matters more: character or policy? Michael Smerconish explores one of the oldest and most uncomfortable questions in American politics: should voters prioritize a candidate’s personal character or the policies they promise to deliver? Drawing on the views of Colin Powell and James Madison, plus examples from JFK, Nixon, Clinton, and Trump, Michael examines the gap between what voters say matters and how they actually vote. If millions knowingly support candidates they view as dishonest or immoral, is policy ultimately what drives elections? Or does character still define leadership in a meaningful way? This episode unpacks the tradeoffs voters make in the privacy of the voting booth.

Former Ohio Governor and presidential candidate John Kasich joins Michael Smerconish to discuss the launch of his new SiriusXM POTUS show, the state of the Republican Party, open primaries, political extremism, AI guardrails, and why independent thinking is disappearing from American politics. Then, Michael takes listener calls on Trump’s GOP, John Fetterman, and whether open primaries could reshape future elections. Original air date 19 May 2026.

Today's Poll Question at Smerconish.com: Who do you want enforcing traffic laws, AI or cops? After receiving a $300 automated school bus violation notice tied to his own Jeep, Michael Smerconish dives into the growing role of artificial intelligence in policing everyday life. From AI-powered traffic cameras to license plate readers now operating in thousands of communities, this episode explores the tradeoff between efficiency, safety, privacy, and human judgment. Michael connects his personal experience to a much larger national debate: are Americans comfortable replacing police discretion with algorithms and automated enforcement systems? Plus, he reflects on yesterday’s heated Iran poll results and why voters may be letting politics cloud national security judgment. Listen here, then vote!

Michael opens with an unexpected weekend golf win before diving into the CNN commentary that sparked major backlash online. He breaks down Trump’s controversial Iran remarks, rising gas prices, strategic ambiguity over Taiwan, and whether Americans would accept pain at the pump to stop Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. Plus, listener calls, angry social media reactions, and a debate that cuts across party lines. Original air date 18 May 2026.

Today's Poll Question at Smerconish.com: Is a nuclear-free Iran worth more pain at the pump? Michael explores the political and economic tradeoffs behind escalating tensions with Iran, asking whether Americans are willing to absorb higher gasoline prices to prevent Tehran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. Drawing on Reuters reporting from deeply conservative Colorado counties, Michael examines why many Trump voters say the answer is yes — even as fuel costs hit rural Americans hardest. He also discusses President Trump’s comments on Iran and Taiwan, media criticism surrounding his China trip, and what the Cassidy, Massie, and Fetterman political storylines reveal about the growing power of closed primaries in American politics. Listen here, cast your ballot, and be sure to rate, review, and share this podcast!

Michael Smerconish speaks with Princeton professor Robert P. George about the growing lack of conservative commencement speakers at America’s top universities — and what that says about viewpoint diversity in higher education. They discuss political bias on campus, free speech, commencement controversies, AI in academia, and Princeton’s decision to end its 133-year unproctored exam tradition amid concerns about cheating and artificial intelligence. Original air date 13 May 2026.

Today's Poll Question at Smerconish.com: Who’s more likely to be elected president in 2028 — AOC or Marco Rubio? Michael Smerconish examines the surprising early signals emerging in the 2028 presidential race, including Marco Rubio’s rapid rise among Republican voters and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s growing strength inside the Democratic Party. With new polling, prediction market data, and Donald Trump openly fueling speculation about the GOP succession battle between JD Vance and Rubio, the conversation turns to electability, coalition-building, and where both parties may be headed after Trump. Listen here, then vote! And be sure to rate, review, and share this podcast.

Michael speaks with Wall Street Journal reporter and "The Devil at His Elbow" author Valerie Bauerlein about the stunning overturning of Alex Murdaugh’s murder conviction in South Carolina. They unpack the explosive story surrounding Colleton County Clerk Becky Hill, claims of juror influence, the “egg lady” juror dismissal, missing murder weapons, and why South Carolina prosecutors are preparing to retry Murdaugh for the murders of Maggie and Paul. Even after years of headlines, the Murdaugh saga continues to reveal shocking new layers. Original air date 14 May 2026.

Today's Poll Question at Smerconish.com: If you had to pick one, which is it: cut our losses now or bomb Iran into submission? As President Trump meets with Xi Jinping in Beijing, new intelligence reports suggest Iran remains far more operational than Americans have been told. Michael examines fresh reporting from The Washington Post and The New York Times indicating Tehran still retains much of its missile capability despite weeks of U.S. and Israeli strikes. With ceasefire talks stalled, gas prices climbing, and billions already spent, Michael explores the stark divide now emerging in Washington: negotiate an exit and move on, or escalate dramatically to force Iran into submission. Listen here, and vote....and share this podcast!

Michael Smerconish is joined by Mark Halperin for a wide-ranging conversation on President Trump’s escalating standoff with Iran, the growing crisis in the Strait of Hormuz, and whether the White House is running out of options. Could Trump expand the conflict? Is there an exit ramp? Michael and Mark debate the political, military, and economic stakes — and listeners weigh in on what happens next. Original air date 13 May 2026.

Today's Poll Question at Smerconish.com: Will Trump order new strikes on Iran during his China trip? Michael explores an eerie parallel to 2017, when Trump launched strikes on Syria while hosting Xi Jinping, raising questions about whether history could repeat itself during the president’s current China visit. He also examines Trump’s controversial “not even a little bit” remark when asked whether Americans’ financial pain is influencing Iran negotiations—and why critics are seizing on it. Plus, yesterday's startling poll result showing nearly half of respondents believe at least one Trump assassination attempt was staged, tying it to the rise of what scholars call “conspiracy without the theory”—a viral, algorithm-driven form of misinformation untethered from evidence. Listen here, then vote on today's poll question...and please rate, review and share this podcast!

Michael Smerconish reacts to a provocative Axios piece arguing that America is becoming a modern “Sin Nation” — where gambling, marijuana, pornography, and digital vice are no longer hidden, but legalized, monetized, and normalized. From “It’s a Wonderful Life” and Robert Putnam’s "Bowling Alone" to declining faith, patriotism, and community involvement, Michael explores whether America is losing the social glue that once held it together — and whether technology, capitalism, and politics accelerated the shift. Listeners weigh in on everything from Vegas culture and junk food to loneliness, digital life, and the erosion of real-world relationships. Original air date 12 May 2026.

Today's Poll Question at Smerconish.com: Were any of the three Trump assassination attempts staged? Michael examines a startling new survey showing that nearly one-third of Americans believe at least one assassination attempt against Donald Trump was staged—or aren’t sure the attacks were real. From Butler to the golf course incident to the White House Correspondents’ Dinner scare, Michael breaks down the conspiracy theories gaining traction, the partisan divide driving public opinion, and why distrust is becoming a defining feature of modern politics. Listen here, then vote, and please rate, review and share this podcast!

Michael explores the overlooked conversation surrounding Ted Turner’s bipolar disorder and asks whether mental illness can sometimes contribute to extraordinary leadership, creativity, and resilience. Drawing on the work of psychiatrist Dr. Nassir Ghaemi — author of A "First-Rate Madness" — Smerconish examines historical figures like Churchill, Lincoln, MLK Jr., and Turner himself through the lens of mental health. The episode also dives into Ben Sasse’s warning about AI, loneliness, declining trust, and the erosion of human connection in modern America. From shrinking conversations to algorithm-driven lives, Smerconish reflects on what’s being lost — and how we might reclaim it. A wide-ranging discussion about mental health, technology, politics, culture, and the future of human relationships. Original air date 11 May 2026.

Today's Poll Question at Smerconish.com: Which war ends first — Russia/Ukraine or U.S./Israel versus Iran? Michael examines two global conflicts that suddenly appear to be moving in opposite directions. Vladimir Putin is hinting that the Russia-Ukraine war could be “coming to an end,” even as ceasefire violations continue and battlefield clashes intensify. Meanwhile, tensions between the U.S., Israel, and Iran are escalating rapidly, with failed negotiations, military strikes near the Strait of Hormuz, and fears of broader regional instability driving energy prices higher. Michael also reflects on Admiral James Stavridis’ new geopolitical thriller 2084 and the unsettling future scenarios it imagines. Which conflict is closer to resolution — and which is only becoming more dangerous? Listen here, then vote!

Michael dives into the explosive backlash surrounding New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s new “pied-à-terre” tax targeting ultra-wealthy property owners who do not live in the city full-time. After billionaire hedge fund manager Ken Griffin blasted Mamdani’s viral “tax the rich” video and threatened to expand jobs outside New York, Michael asks a provocative question: Has “tax the rich” become a political slur? Listeners from across the country weigh in on wealth inequality, fairness, capitalism, philanthropy, and whether aggressive taxation could push jobs and investment out of major cities. Plus: reactions to Wall Street’s growing frustration with New York politics and what it all says about America’s widening economic divide. Original air date 7 May 2026.

Today's Poll Question at Smerconish.com: Is the phrase “tax the rich” a slur against wealthy Americans? Michael examines the political and cultural firestorm sparked by New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s viral “tax the rich” video targeting billionaire Ken Griffin’s Manhattan penthouse. Supporters call it economic fairness; critics call it class-based demonization. With Wall Street leaders warning that anti-wealth rhetoric could drive jobs and investment out of New York, Michael explores where legitimate tax policy ends and public shaming begins. Is “tax the rich” simply a political slogan, or has it become a derogatory label aimed at successful Americans? Listen in, then vote! And please rate, review and share this podcast.

Media titan John Malone joins Michael for a deeply personal conversation about his lifelong friendship with CNN founder Ted Turner, who passed away this week at age 87. Malone shares behind-the-scenes stories about Turner’s rise, his relationships with Jane Fonda and Rupert Murdoch, the birth of CNN, and Turner’s concerns about the future of cable news. The discussion also explores polarization in America, the evolution of 24/7 media, and whether news has become entertainment. Original air date 7 May 2026.

Today's Poll Question at Smerconish.com: Has the 24/7 news cycle done more public good or harm? Michael reflects on the life and legacy of CNN founder Ted Turner while examining the profound impact of round-the-clock news coverage on American society. From the Gulf War and 9/11 to O.J., political polarization, and “doomscrolling,” Michael explores how cable news transformed journalism, public awareness, and national discourse. Did real-time reporting democratize information and strengthen accountability — or create ideological silos, anxiety, and a nonstop demand for outrage? Listen here, then vote! And please rate, review and share this podcast.

Michael Smerconish and Mark Halperin break down the confusion, contradictions, and political fallout surrounding Trump’s Iran strategy — from nuclear negotiations and the Strait of Hormuz to whether the president is heading toward a historic win or an Obama-style replay. Plus: midterm warning signs for Republicans, and key races in Texas, Ohio, and California. Original air date 6 May 2026.

Today's Poll Question at Smerconish.com: Is Donald Trump more a consequence or the cause of our political polarization? Michael argues that most voters will instinctively blame Donald Trump for America’s deep political divide — but says the more accurate answer is that Trump is a consequence of forces decades in the making. Drawing on conversations with Axios co-founder Jim VandeHei and Harvard political scientist Robert Putnam, author of "Bowling Alone", Michael explores how social isolation, declining civic engagement, and the collapse of shared community life created fertile ground for populism long before Trump arrived. The episode also previews Smerconish’s new Mingle Project interview with Putnam and examines why Americans may actually have more in common than today’s media environment suggests.

Michael sits down with POLITICO’s Jonathan Martin to unpack a surprising political storyline: a quiet Republican effort to court Senator John Fetterman (D-PA). With control of the Senate potentially hinging on just a few seats, could Fetterman become the ultimate swing vote—or even consider breaking from his party? They explore why Fetterman is increasingly at odds with fellow Democrats, how Republicans see an opportunity, and what it all could mean for 2026 and beyond. Then, listeners weigh in: Is Fetterman a political outlier strengthening the system—or a liability to his party? A candid, thought-provoking conversation about party identity, political independence, and the future of the Senate. Original air date 5 May 2026.

Today's Poll Question at Smerconish.com: 'True or false? Americans are hopelessly divided and increasingly hateful.' Michael challenges the dominant narrative of a fractured America, drawing on insights from Axios co-founder Jim VandeHei and broader social data. While cable news and social media amplify conflict, most Americans remain disconnected from that noise—focused instead on work, family, and community. Listen in as Michael explores how algorithms, declining shared experiences, and social “self-sorting” create the illusion of division, even as acts of generosity and civic engagement tell a different story. Is the country truly coming apart—or are we being misled about who we really are? Be sure to vote at Smerconish.com, and rate, review and share this podcast.

Michael revisits his powerful CNN interview with Admiral William McRaven, the former Navy SEAL commander behind Operation Neptune Spear and author of "Duty, Honor, Country and Life." After asking McRaven to read from his poem “I Remember,” a tribute to fallen service members and Gold Star families, the moment turned unexpectedly emotional. Michael reflects on the silence, the sacrifice, and why listeners say America needs more leaders like McRaven. Original air date 4 May 2026.

Today's Poll Question at Smerconish.com: Are people's opinions of Donald Trump today driven more by his policies or his personality? Fresh polling from ABC/Washington Post and Pew shows Trump’s approval sinking to new lows, with majorities disapproving not just of his leadership style—but nearly every major policy issue as well. For years, critics drew a distinction between Trump’s conduct and his agenda. Now, those lines appear to be converging. Listen to Michael's take, and then cast your vote!

Michael sits down with legal scholar John Yoo to unpack today’s biggest legal and political flashpoints. From presidential war powers and U.S. involvement in Iran to a major Supreme Court ruling that could reignite redistricting battles nationwide, Yoo explains what’s at stake. Plus, they dive into the controversial “86 47” case and whether it crosses the line from political speech to criminal threat. A wide-ranging, thought-provoking conversation on law, power, and the Constitution.

Michael breaks down the headline-grabbing indictment of former FBI Director James Comey. With legal experts questioning the strength of the case—and whether it will ever reach a jury—Michael examines the First Amendment implications, key Supreme Court precedents, and why this prosecution may be doomed from the start. Listen here, then vote at Smerconish.com, and please rate, review and share this podcast.

Michael Smerconish sits down with independent Senate candidate Seth Bodnar to discuss his unconventional run in Montana, the controversy surrounding a last-minute GOP shake-up, and why he refuses to caucus with either party. From war powers and foreign policy to political polarization at home, the conversation explores what it means to govern from the center. Then, Montana listeners weigh in on the race, party dynamics, and life in Big Sky Country—culminating in a surprise call from one of Michael’s longtime friends. Original air date 30 April 2026.

Today's Poll Question at Smerconish.com: Should race be considered when drawing legislative boundary lines? The Supreme Court’s latest 6–3 decision on redistricting could have sweeping consequences for how political power is allocated across the country. Michael breaks down the complex Louisiana case at the center of the ruling, the clash between constitutional “colorblindness” and protections for minority representation, and what this means for the future of the Voting Rights Act. With potential ripple effects across Southern states and beyond, the episode explores whether fairness demands ignoring race—or confronting it directly. Listen here, then vote!

Michael Smerconish dives into a remarkable moment in U.S.–U.K. relations as King Charles III delivers a speech to Congress that may have carried more than just ceremonial weight. CNN’s Stephen Collinson joins to unpack the “subtle but striking” message on democracy, executive power, and America’s global role—plus the political theater behind the royal visit and its impact on President Trump. Then, political analyst Mark Halperin breaks down the latest headlines: Trump’s legal strategy and “lawfare,” the real significance of the King’s visit, tensions over Ukraine and Iran, and media flashpoints from late-night comedy to the White House Correspondents’ Dinner. It’s a wide-ranging conversation on power, politics, and perception in a week where symbolism and strategy collided. Original air date 29 April 2026.

Today's Poll Question at Smerconish.com: "On a scale of 1 to 10, rate the Biden presidency." Michael invites listeners to render a retrospective judgment on Joe Biden’s time in office, as a new scholarly book offers the first historical assessment of his presidency. With discussion of legislative wins like the CHIPS Act and infrastructure bill, alongside challenges including inflation, Afghanistan, and border policy, the episode explores how timing, perception, and political aftermath shape legacy. Drawing on polling data and historical context, Smerconish asks whether Biden’s final chapter altered the way his presidency will be remembered—and how you would score it today. Listen here, then vote at Smerconish.com, and please rate, review and share this podcast.

In the aftermath of a shocking incident at the 2026 White House Correspondents’ Dinner where a shooter - potentially trying to assassinate the President - was apprehended at a security checkpoint, conspiracy theories spread at lightning speed online—raising questions about security, misinformation, and public trust. Michael examines what actually happened, looks at the psychology behind viral conspiracies, and opens the phones to listeners divided on what to believe. From the WHCD scare to broader debates about “false flag” thinking and the role of social media, this episode explores why so many Americans are questioning reality—and what that means for the future of political discourse. Original air date 28 April 2026.

Today's Poll Question at Smerconish.com: Are geofence warrants - which sweep up the location data of everybody in an area - worth the risk to our privacy? Michael unpacks a pivotal Supreme Court case testing the limits of law enforcement in the digital age. After a Virginia bank robbery was solved using geofence data, the Court must now weigh public safety against constitutional protections. With unusual alliances emerging among the justices, the debate highlights broader concerns about surveillance, personal data, and the future of policing. Is this a necessary tool to catch criminals—or a dangerous precedent for privacy? Listen here, then vote, and please rate, review and share this podcast!

A shocking security scare rocked the White House Correspondents’ Dinner, raising urgent questions about how a gunman got so close—and whether disaster was narrowly avoided. Michael breaks down the incident, asking: was it a security success or a failure? With firsthand insight from SiriusXM colleague, veteran journalist and former WHCA president Steve Scully, this episode takes you inside the room—from the early warning signs to the chaotic moments when shots were reported and guests were told to take cover. Plus, new details about vulnerabilities at the venue, the role of pre-event access, and what this means for the future of one of Washington’s most high-profile gatherings. Original air date 27 April 2026.

Today's Poll Question at Smerconish.com: Was Saturday's assassination attempt a security success or security failure? Michael examines the alarming incident at the Washington Hilton, where a gunman was stopped before reaching his target—but not before raising serious concerns. Was this a case of security doing exactly what it was designed to do, or did systemic vulnerabilities allow a dangerous situation to unfold in the first place? Listen in, then vote.

Today's Poll Question at Smerconish.com: Should SNAP recipients be able to use their benefits to buy hot rotisserie chicken? Michael revisits the debate over food assistance rules as a bipartisan group of senators pushes to carve out a narrow exception to the long-standing ban on hot foods. The issue highlights a quirky regulatory gap—where a cold rotisserie chicken is allowed, but a hot one is not—raising questions about practicality, dignity, and intent. Supporters argue it’s a common-sense fix for families, seniors, and those without cooking access, while critics warn it could open the door to broader changes. Is this smart reform or the start of a slippery slope?

Michael talks with Reggie Love, former aide and “body man” to President Barack Obama, about his remarkable journey from the Senate mailroom to the White House. Love shares behind-the-scenes stories of campaign life, presidential travel, trust, mentorship, and the unforgettable moment of Obama’s inauguration—plus how his path from Duke athlete to trusted presidential insider shaped his life and career. Original air date 22 April 2026.

Today's Poll Question at Smerconish.com: Britain just banned tobacco sales to anyone born in 2009 or later, forever. Should the U.S. do the same? Michael breaks down the UK’s unprecedented “smoke-free generation” policy, which phases out tobacco access by birth year rather than banning it outright. The approach aims to stop addiction before it starts, citing data that most smokers begin young—but critics call it discriminatory and overly paternalistic. With similar efforts attempted (and reversed) in places like New Zealand, the debate raises fundamental questions about public health, personal freedom, and whether such a policy could—or should—ever take hold in the United States. Listen here, then vote! And please rate, review, and share this podcast.

Bruce Springsteen’s latest tour is making headlines—not just for the music, but for its strong political message. Michael dives into the growing debate: has The Boss gone too far, or is he simply using his platform as artists always have? With ticket prices soaring and politics front and center, fans are split. Some praise Springsteen’s activism and authenticity, while others question the cost, the messaging, and whether concerts should be an escape from politics altogether. Plus, listeners from across the country weigh in—would they go to the show, or sit this one out? Listen in, then be sure to rate, review, and share this podcast!

Today's Poll Question at Smerconish.com: Is retaliatory gerrymandering ever justified? Michael unpacks Virginia’s controversial mid-decade redistricting move and the broader national trend of partisan map-drawing in response to earlier actions by opposing parties. With Republicans and Democrats both reshaping districts to gain advantage, the question becomes whether “fighting fire with fire” is defensible—or corrosive to democracy itself. Is this strategic necessity, or a race to the bottom? Listen here, then vote!

Ironically, you should put your phone away....AFTER listening to this episode. Michael explores a growing crisis hiding in plain sight: the loss of contemplation in modern life. Drawing on research from The Washington Post and Georgetown professor Cal Newport, Michael examines how constant audio, smartphones, and even AI may be eroding our ability to think deeply. With Americans consuming hours of content daily and attention spans shrinking dramatically, what are we losing—and what are the consequences for our minds, our productivity, and even the economy? Through reflections on historian David McCullough’s disciplined thinking process and conversations with callers, Michael makes the case for a “mental fitness” revolution—one that prioritizes silence, reading, and intentional thought in an age of endless distraction. Listen here, and then rate, review and share this podcast...and then put your phone away and take some time to contemplate. Original air date 21 April 2026.

Today's Poll Question at Smerconish.com: "Is John Fetterman a Democratic Party asset or liability?" Michael unpacks the growing divide within the Democratic Party as Senator John Fetterman (D-PA) breaks ranks on key issues, including Iran and U.S. foreign policy. After yesterday's conversation with Fetterman (listen to the podcast episode!), Michael explores whether his independence, candor on mental health, and cross-party appeal strengthen or undermine Democratic prospects. With polling showing uneven support among Democrats but surprising favorability among Republicans, the episode examines what Fetterman’s trajectory could mean for 2028, party unity, and the broader political landscape. Listen, and rate, review and share this podcast.

As tensions escalate in the Iran conflict, Senator John Fetterman (D-PA) joins Michael for a candid and high-stakes conversation about war powers, nuclear threats, and political divisions in Washington. Fetterman explains why he’s breaking with most Democrats to support authorizing military force against Iran, arguing the U.S. must act decisively to prevent a nuclear-armed regime. Michael and Fetterman debate the legal, political, and moral implications of the War Powers Act, the looming congressional deadlines, and whether partisanship is shaping national security decisions. With a fragile ceasefire, rising casualties, and questions about America’s next move, this episode dives into one of the most consequential foreign policy debates facing the country today. Original air date 20 April 2026.

Today's Poll Question at Smerconish.com: Should Congress authorize the use of military force against Iran? As tensions escalate and a fragile ceasefire nears expiration, Michael Smerconish breaks down the legal, political, and strategic stakes behind a potential Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF). With the War Powers deadline looming, Congress faces mounting pressure to act—or step aside. Michael examines recent military developments, inside-the-Beltway maneuvering, and why the timeline may be shaping Iran’s strategy. Listen here, then vote!

A new set of political data is challenging a long-held assumption about American voters—and even Michael Smerconish himself. After reviewing insights from veteran political strategist Doug Sosnik, Michael digs into a surprising claim: the voters who actually decide elections aren’t the fiscally conservative, socially liberal “centrists” many believe dominate the middle. Instead, the data points to a different, often overlooked group—economically populist but socially conservative. But when Michael polled his own audience, the results told a completely different story. So who really represents America? And who actually swings elections? This episode explores the growing divide between perception and reality in U.S. politics, the influence of “anti-woke” sentiment, and whether the country is truly center-right—or something more complicated. Original air date 17 April 2026.

Today's Poll Question at Smerconish.com: Should Social Security cap benefits for the wealthiest retirees? Michael Smerconish explores a provocative proposal to limit Social Security payouts for high-income retirees, raising fundamental questions about the program’s purpose. Is it a guaranteed return on what you paid in—or a safety net meant to prevent poverty? With nearly half of Americans lacking retirement savings and the worker-to-retiree ratio shrinking, pressure is mounting to rethink the system’s sustainability. Smerconish breaks down the economic realities, political implications, and competing philosophies shaping this debate, and explains why your answer likely depends on how you define fairness in retirement. Listen in, then cast your ballot.

In this episode, Michael dives into a generational debate that never seems to go away: who had it harder—boomers or millennials? Drawing on new data from The Wall Street Journal, Michael breaks down income, housing, college costs, and major economic events that shaped each generation. From 18% mortgage rates to student debt and the 2008 financial crisis, both sides make their case. Listeners from across the country weigh in, offering personal stories and sharp opinions on whether today’s younger Americans are truly worse off—or just facing different challenges. Listen in, and please rate, review and share this podcast!

Today's Poll Question at Smerconish.com: Which describes you best? a) Fiscally liberal, socially conservative, b) Fiscally conservative, socially conservative, c) Fiscally liberal, socially liberal, d) Fiscally conservative, socially liberal? Michael revisits a long-held assumption about the American electorate after a revealing conversation with political strategist Doug Sosnik earlier this week (Episode # 1821). Using data-driven insights—Sosnik argues that the decisive voting bloc isn’t where many think it is. Listen here, then vote! And be sure to rate, review, and share this podcast.

Michael is joined by political analyst Mark Halperin for a wide-ranging conversation on the latest headlines shaping American politics. They break down Donald Trump’s controversial clash with the Pope, the strategy behind his “counterpunching” style, and whether any political move can truly hurt him. The discussion turns to rising tensions with Iran and what a potential deal—or escalation—could mean for U.S. politics and global stability. Halperin also weighs in on the 2028 presidential field, the risks candidates face under intense scrutiny, and why midterm results may not predict the next White House race. Listen here, then rate, review and share this podcast! Original air date 15 April 2026.

Today's Poll Question at Smerconish.com: "Is America's record low fertility rate a problem?" America’s birth rate has fallen to historic lows, well below the level needed to sustain the population—but does it actually matter? Michael explores the economic, social, and political implications of a shrinking younger generation, including pressure on Social Security, a tightening labor force, and shifting demographics. Listen here for some great insights and data, then vote, and please rate, review and share this podcast.

Reps. Eric Swalwell and Tony Gonzales stepping down from Congress has reignited a major question in Washington: when should lawmakers be forced out—and what does due process really look like on Capitol Hill? To unpack it, Michael Smerconish turns to a unique voice: George Santos, one of the only members ever expelled from the House of Representatives. In a candid and often controversial conversation, Santos weighs in on the resignations, the culture inside Congress, and whether accusations alone are now enough to end a political career. He also reflects on his own expulsion, his time in prison—including weeks in solitary confinement—and the moment he learned his sentence had been commuted by former President Donald Trump. Plus, listeners join the conversation, debating whether members of Congress are held to a different standard—and what accountability in Washington should really look like. Original air date 14 April 2026.

Today's Poll Question at Smerconish.com: "Which is a greater existential threat, runaway AI or nuclear weapons?" Michael Smerconish explores a rapidly shifting global risk landscape, drawing on insights from New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman and former White House counterterrorism and cyber threat advisor Richard Clarke. With breakthroughs in AI capable of exposing critical software vulnerabilities—and quantum computing threatening to crack modern encryption—the conversation moves beyond theory into urgent reality. Could emerging technologies destabilize global systems faster than traditional military threats? Or do nuclear weapons remain the ultimate danger? This episode examines the stakes, the science, and why some experts believe humanity is unprepared for what’s coming next. Listen here, then vote at Smerconish.com - and please rate, review, and share this podcast.

Michael welcomes political strategist Doug Sosnik for a wide-ranging conversation on the 2026 midterms, Trump’s standing, and the structural forces reshaping American politics. Sosnik explains why Republican prospects have weakened, why Democrats still face major limits, and how wealth inequality, education, geography, and voter frustration are driving a deeper political realignment. Original air date 13 April 2026.

Today's Poll Question at Smerconish.com: "Should the US blockade the Strait of Hormuz?" Michael unpacks the escalating U.S.-Iran standoff following stalled negotiations and a dramatic strategic shift: a potential blockade of one of the world’s most critical oil shipping chokepoints. With Iran exporting millions of barrels daily—and global oil prices hanging in the balance—Michael weighs the economic risks, military implications, and political calculations behind the move. Listen here, then vote at Smerconish.com, and please rate, review, and share this podcast.

Michael takes a deep dive into the Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA) with peace and conflict expert Dr. David Cortright of Cornell and Notre Dame Universities, breaking down how the agreement came together, what it accomplished, and why it ultimately unraveled. They explore the role of the Obama administration, the arguments from critics, and the consequences of the U.S. withdrawal under President Trump. Then, listeners weigh in with passionate and wide-ranging perspectives—from military strategy and oil politics to trust, diplomacy, and the risk of nuclear escalation. Original air date 9 April 2026.

Today’s Poll Question at Smerconish.com: Is President Trump a rational actor? Michael Smerconish unpacks a provocative debate sparked by Yale professor Jeffrey Sonnenfeld’s analysis of Donald Trump’s leadership style, on yesterday's radio program. Rather than dismissing Trump as chaotic or impulsive, Sonnenfeld argues there’s a deliberate strategy at work—one rooted in leverage, distraction, and constant motion. Smerconish explores whether Trump’s actions reflect calculated decision-making or pure instinct, and why the framing of the question matters. Is this a case of misunderstood strategy, or something else entirely? Cast your vote and consider what “rational” really means in today’s political landscape.

What happens when you go back and check your predictions against reality? In this episode, after touching on the latest on what's happening in Iran, Michael revisits years of Smerconish.com daily poll questions—from elections and political figures to global conflicts—and asks a simple question: Did we get it right? The results are surprising. Some predictions feel spot-on, others… not so much. From early takes on Biden and Trump to reactions after major global events, this episode is a fascinating look at collective wisdom, hindsight, and how public opinion evolves over time. Plus: one poll result that was wildly off the mark.

Today's Poll Question at Smerconish.com: If necessary to open the Strait of Hormuz, should the U.S. use military force? Michael unpacks a rapidly escalating geopolitical crisis as a fragile ceasefire appears to unravel and tensions spike across the Middle East. With Iran, Israel, and the U.S. trading accusations—and the critical Strait of Hormuz potentially closed—what’s at stake for global oil supply and international law? Featuring insights from Admiral James Stavridis, this episode breaks down why the strait matters, what “freedom of navigation” really means, and whether military action could be justified—or disastrous. Plus, a look back at past poll predictions and how often they’ve gotten it right. Listen, vote, and please rate, review and share this podcast!

Michael tackles the rapidly evolving Iran crisis with two expert voices offering sharply different lenses. First, former NATO Supreme Allied Commander Admiral James Stavridis explains why Iran’s push to control the Strait of Hormuz is a “fantasy,” what real risks exist for global shipping, and why the war’s biggest issues—like enriched uranium—remain unresolved. Then, political analyst Mark Halperin breaks down the media narrative surrounding Trump’s ceasefire decision, the confusion over Iran’s nuclear program, and what the conflict signals to global powers like China and Russia. Is this a path to peace—or just a pause before the next escalation? And did the U.S. gain leverage, or lose ground? A fast-moving, fact-driven conversation on war, diplomacy, and what comes next. Original air date 8 April 2026

Today's Poll Question at Smerconish.com: Is the two week ceasefire a prelude to a lasting peace? Michael Smerconish examines the fragile and confusing pause between the U.S. and Iran, unpacking conflicting media narratives, disputed statements from Iranian leadership, and the high-stakes diplomacy behind the scenes. Drawing on new reporting tied to Trump-era decision-making and current negotiations, he questions whether both sides even agree on the terms—let alone the outcome. With Iran’s sweeping demands and unresolved nuclear concerns, Michael explains why skepticism is warranted and why this moment may be less about peace than a temporary reset in a volatile standoff. Listen here, then cast your ballot!

Former National Security Advisor John Bolton joins Michael to break down the escalating U.S.–Iran crisis as President Trump issues a dramatic ultimatum. Will the U.S. strike Iranian infrastructure—and what would that mean for regime change, global oil markets, and the risk of wider war? Bolton argues the stakes go far beyond nuclear weapons, warning that control of the Strait of Hormuz could reshape the global economy and shift power toward Iran, Russia, and China. Then, listeners weigh in with sharp—and often conflicting—takes: Is this necessary strategy or a dangerous overreach? Could strikes on infrastructure backfire? And what does “victory” even look like A high-stakes conversation on war, diplomacy, and America’s role in the Middle East. Original air date 7 April 2026.

Today's Poll Question at Smerconish.com: Should college athletes be paid? Michael Smerconish dives into the rapidly evolving world of college athletics in the NIL era, where multimillion-dollar deals, transfer portal chaos, and shifting power dynamics are redefining amateur sports. He reflects on Michigan’s championship run, the rise of athlete compensation, and the unintended consequences for smaller programs. With political lines beginning to form and legal precedent already set, is this the least-worst system—or one in need of serious reform? Listen here, then vote, and please rate, review, and share this podcast.

When a U.S. F-15 is shot down deep inside Iran, what follows is a high-risk, high-stakes rescue mission that showcases the full power—and complexity—of the American military. Michael is joined by Lt. General David Deptula (Ret.) to break down how elite SERE (Survival, Evasion, Resistance, Escape) training prepares pilots for the unthinkable—and how those skills played a critical role in this real-world crisis. From CIA deception tactics to massive coordinated airpower, the operation raises big questions: How much should the public know about sensitive missions? And does sharing these details strengthen—or weaken—national security? Plus, callers weigh in with firsthand SERE training experiences and debate the cost, risks, and ethics behind America’s “leave no one behind” doctrine. A gripping look inside modern warfare, survival training, and the stories we tell about both. Listen in, and please rate, review and share this podcast. Original air date 6 April 2026.

Today's Poll Question at Smerconish.com: Should the U.S. target Iran's power generating facilities and bridges if they help support its war machine? As tensions escalate and a presidential deadline looms, Michael examines whether striking Iran’s infrastructure would be a legitimate military tactic or a dangerous escalation with humanitarian consequences. He breaks down the legal gray areas under international law, including when dual-use targets like power plants and bridges become fair game. With voters already split on prior Iran-related questions, this latest poll probes the line between strategic necessity and potential war crimes—while raising concerns about unintended consequences. Listen here, then vote, and please rate, review and share this podcast.

Michael sits down with Dr. Brian Rosenwald, author of "Talk Radio’s America", to break down the rapidly evolving world of conservative media. Rosenwald—whose work was once praised by Rush Limbaugh himself—explains how talk radio helped pave the way for Donald Trump’s 2016 victory. But today’s media landscape looks nothing like it did then. From legacy voices like Sean Hannity to the rise of Joe Rogan and the “manosphere,” Rosenwald maps out eight distinct factions shaping conservative media in 2026. He explores the influence of viral social media personalities, MAGA loyalists, conspiracy-driven figures, and a new wave of lifestyle influencers targeting younger audiences. The conversation also tackles a key question: Has conservative media become too fragmented for any single voice to dominate—and what does that mean for future elections? If you want to understand the forces driving political discourse today—and where it’s headed next—this is a must-listen. Original air date 3 April 2026

Today's Poll Question at Smerconish.com: Do you feel more drawn to organized religion, less drawn, or about the same? As Easter, Passover, and Ramadan converge, Michael explores whether America is experiencing a quiet return to organized faith—or continuing its long secular drift. New data shows declining religious affiliation overall, yet a surprising increase in Catholic and Orthodox conversions. What’s driving this contradiction? From post-COVID isolation to technology’s grip on daily life, Michael examines whether a hunger for community, structure, and human connection is pulling people back toward churches, synagogues, and mosques—and asks listeners where they stand.