Nach Genre filtern

Trump's Trials

Trump's Trials

NPR

Reporting and analysis on the inquiries, trials, and criminal probes facing former President Donald Trump. From the Jan. 6 insurrection and Georgia election interference, to the ongoing question of classified documents - and beyond - host Scott Detrow, political editor Domenico Montanaro and legal experts dive deep every week to explore the news inside the courtrooms and the stakes for American democracy.

Support NPR's reporting by subscribing to Trump's Trials+ and unlock sponsor-free listening. Learn more at plus.npr.org/trumpstrials

59 - Week one of testimony in hush money trial, plus Supreme Court weighs immunity
0:00 / 0:00
1x
  • 59 - Week one of testimony in hush money trial, plus Supreme Court weighs immunity

    This week on Trump's Trials, host Scott Detrow and Domenico Montanaro are joined by law professor Kim Wehle.

    This was the first week of witness testimony in former President Donald Trump's New York hush money trial. The prosecution used their witnesses to establish Trump's knowledge and involvement in hush money payments for his alleged electoral benefit. Trump's defense team cross-examined witnesses countering that framing with the idea that this is politics as usual.

    Meanwhile, at the Supreme Court, justices heard oral arguments over whether Trump is immune from criminal prosecution. Although the justices seemed skeptical of granting Trump absolute immunity, it appeared the majority of the conservatives justices seemed opened to granting some sort of immunity for presidents.

    Topics include:
    - Week one of testimony in hush money trial
    - David Pecker testimony
    - Supreme court and immunity

    Follow the show on Apple Podcasts or Spotify for new episodes each Saturday.

    Sign up for sponsor-free episodes and support NPR's political journalism at plus.npr.org/trumpstrials.

    Email the show at trumpstrials@npr.org.

    Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    NPR Privacy Policy

    Sat, 27 Apr 2024
  • 58 - Witness cross-examined in hush money trial, plus new indictments in Arizona

    For this episode of Trump's Trialshost Scott Detrow speaks with NPR'sAndrea Bernsteinabout the latest in the New York hush money trial. Later, election law professor Edward Foley explains the fake elector indictments out of Arizona.

    In a New York courtroom, former National Enquirer publisher David Pecker took the stand for his third day of testimony. In his testimony Pecker said Trump had intimate knowledge of hush money payments from the very beginning. Pecker was then questioned by Trump's defense team, who tried to poke holes in his story.

    In Arizona, 18 people have been indicted for their alleged efforts to overturn the state's 2020 election. They include some of former President Donald Trump's closet allies — former Chief of Staff Mark Meadows and his personal attorney Rudy Giuliani. Trump himself was listed as an unindicted co-conspirator. Arizona becomes the fourth state to criminally charge people related to the fake electors scheme.

    Topics include:
    - Hush money trial testimony
    - Cross examination begins
    - Fake electors scheme

    Follow the show on Apple Podcasts or Spotify for new episodes each Saturday.

    Sign up for sponsor-free episodes and support NPR's political journalism at plus.npr.org/trumpstrials.

    Email the show at trumpstrials@npr.org.

    Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    NPR Privacy Policy

    Thu, 25 Apr 2024
  • 57 - Supreme Court likely to deny blanket immunity but could limit scope of prosecution

    For this episode of Trump's Trials, NPR's Michel Martin speaks to Chief Legal Affairs Correspondent Nina Totenberg, Washington Desk Senior Editor and Correspondent Ron Elving, National Justice Correspondent Carrie Johnson and former White House Counsel Neil Eggleston.

    On Thursday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments over whether former President Donald Trump is immune from criminal prosecution. A majority of the justices appeared skeptical of blanket immunity. But some of the conservative justices hinted at the need for some immunity for certain actions taken while in office. The speed at which the court releases an opinion could determine whether the federal election interference case goes to trial before the November election.

    Topics include:
    - Justices' questions
    - Scope of immunity
    - Private vs official acts
    - Impact on federal election interference case

    Follow the show on Apple Podcasts or Spotify for new episodes each Saturday.

    Sign up for sponsor-free episodes and support NPR's political journalism at plus.npr.org/trumpstrials.

    Email the show at trumpstrials@npr.org.

    Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    NPR Privacy Policy

    Thu, 25 Apr 2024
  • 56 - Supreme Court to hear oral arguments on presidential immunity

    For this episode of Trump's Trialshost Scott Detrow speaks with NPR Justice Correspondent Carrie Johnson.

    On Thursday the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on whether former President Donald Trump is immune from criminal prosecution.

    Trump is charged with four counts related to alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election. But he is claiming since he was president at the time he cannot face prosecution. If the Supreme Court sides with Trump, the federal election interference case is dead. If they side against him, the case moves forward, but the likelihood of it going to trial before the November election is slim.

    Topics include:
    - Immunity arguments
    - Why did the Supreme Court take this case
    - Potential trial timeline

    Follow the show on Apple Podcasts or Spotify for new episodes each Saturday.

    Sign up for sponsor-free episodes and support NPR's political journalism at plus.npr.org/trumpstrials.

    Email the show at trumpstrials@npr.org.

    Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    NPR Privacy Policy

    Wed, 24 Apr 2024
  • 55 - Witness describes 'catch and kill' scheme to help Trump's 2016 campaign

    For this episode of Trump's Trials, All Things Consideredhost Mary Louise Kelly speaks with political reporter Ximena Bustillo.

    David Pecker, former publisher for the National Enquirer, took the stand for a second day of testimony. Pecker explained that starting in 2015 he, Michael Cohen and Donald Trump had a deal that involved the National Enquirerbuying negative stories about Trump and never publishing them – an arrangement also known as 'catch and kill.' Pecker said this was done to help Trump with his 2016 campaign. In addition, he described planting negative stories about Trump's 2016 rivals, such as the Clintons, then presidential candidate Ted Cruz and other Republican front runners.

    The prosecution also argued that Trump violated the gag order placed on him at least 11 times in recent weeks. They cited posts on Truth Social and comments Trump made outside the courtroom about potential witness Michael Cohen and the jury. The judge has yet to make a ruling.

    Topics include:
    - Gag order
    - Catch and kill deal
    - What's next

    Follow the show on Apple Podcasts or Spotify for new episodes each Saturday.

    Sign up for sponsor-free episodes and support NPR's political journalism at plus.npr.org/trumpstrials.

    Email the show at trumpstrials@npr.org.

    Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    NPR Privacy Policy

    Tue, 23 Apr 2024
Weitere Folgen anzeigen