Come Back With a Warrant

In this episode of Come Back with a Warrant, criminal defense attorneys Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinetz break down the Cornell 7 case: the new civil lawsuit against seven Cornell University fraternity brothers, the District Attorney's decision to reopen the investigation, and what the headlines are getting wrong about the law.The case stems from the night of October 19–20, 2024, at the Chi Phi fraternity house on Cornell's campus. Jane Doe, then a 20-year-old student, alleges she arrived heavily intoxicated after a night of bar hopping, was pressured into taking ketamine, and was sexually assaulted by multiple men. Her civil complaint names the seven students, the fraternity, a sorority, the bar that allegedly served her while underage, and Cornell under Title IX. But her six-page sworn statement to police, given about three weeks after the incident, tells a very different story, and text messages reported by CBS News raise even more questions. Monica and Brandon walk through those inconsistencies and why they matter for both the criminal case and the civil lawsuit.From a criminal defense perspective, they explain why the DA declined to prosecute in the first place. Under New York Penal Law § 130.05, voluntary intoxication does not make someone "mentally incapacitated," and the "physically helpless" theory under People v. Bjork runs into problems when the record shows she refused a proposed foursome and ended encounters herself. They also cover New York's affirmative defense that the accused didn't know the facts causing incapacity, and why this case would likely look very different under Florida's sexual battery law, where there is no origin requirement for intoxication and sex without consent alone can be a second-degree felony. Plus: delayed reporting in sexual assault cases, the beyond a reasonable doubt vs. preponderance of the evidence standard, why the civil case could still end in settlements, and the danger of labeling seven young men before any charges or findings.Topics covered in this episode include: the Cornell 7 case explained, the Cornell fraternity lawsuit, the Chi Phi allegations, the reopened DA investigation, consent and intoxication under New York law, New York Penal Law 130, mental incapacity vs. physical helplessness, People v. Bjork, affirmative defenses in sex crime cases, Florida sexual battery law compared, Title IX and university liability, bar liability for serving an underage, visibly intoxicated customer, delayed reporting and evidence, civil vs. criminal burdens of proof, media pressure and settlements, and the criminal defense perspective on high-profile sexual assault allegations.This episode discusses sexual assault. If you or someone you know has been affected, call the National Sexual Assault Hotline at 800-656-HOPE (4673) or visit rainn.org.Listen to Come Back with a Warrant for legal commentary, criminal defense insight, true crime breakdowns, and real conversations about the justice system. Subscribe, leave a five-star review, and sign up for our weekly newsletter for more criminal defense stories, legal insight, and unfiltered courtroom commentary. Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives. YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast  Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod  TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.PodFind us everywhere and join the conversation! See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In this episode of Come Back with a Warrant, Monica and Brandon break down the Sean "Diddy" Combs federal trial — the RICO conspiracy and sex trafficking case that ended with one of the most surprising verdicts in recent memory. The government charged the music mogul under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, a statute built to take down mob bosses who order crimes without pulling the trigger themselves. So how did a case with hotel surveillance video, thousands of bottles of baby oil, and cooperating witnesses end in acquittal on the biggest counts?Monica and Brandon explain how RICO actually works — the criminal enterprise, the pattern of racketeering activity, the enumerated predicate crimes, and why "someone always flips" in these prosecutions. Then they walk through the five counts against Combs: RICO conspiracy, two counts of sex trafficking by force, fraud, or coercion involving accusers Cassie Ventura and "Jane," and two Mann Act counts for transporting people across state lines for the so-called freak-offs. The jury convicted on the two Mann Act transportation counts only — acquitting Diddy of racketeering and sex trafficking outright. The hosts give their unfiltered defense-attorney take: this case was greatly overcharged by the government. The infamous hotel hallway video of Combs assaulting Cassie was powerful evidence of domestic battery — but domestic battery is not racketeering, and the jury saw the difference. The entire case turned on the line between consent and coercion, and the government couldn't carry its burden.The conversation also covers the defense strategy from attorneys including Brian Steele, the 50 Cent Netflix documentary and whether it made a stronger case than the prosecution did, the uncharged allegations like the Kid Cudi car arson, the history stretching back to Tupac and Biggie, and what cross-examining accusers in a case like this really looks like from the defense table. Finally, they dig into the appeal: Combs's lawyers argue the judge unconstitutionally relied on acquitted conduct — the very coercion allegations the jury rejected — to drive up his sentence. If the appeal wins, what's the remedy, and could Diddy be out in just a few years? And why did he lose so badly in the court of public opinion while winning in the courtroom?Topics covered in this episode include: the Diddy verdict explained, RICO charges and how federal racketeering prosecutions work, sex trafficking law and the meaning of force, fraud, or coercion, the Mann Act and transportation charges, the Cassie hotel video as evidence, consent versus coercion at trial, federal overcharging by prosecutors, cooperating witnesses and why co-conspirators flip, sentencing based on acquitted conduct, the federal appeals process, and the difference between a legal verdict and the court of public opinion. Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives. YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod Find us everywhere and join the conversation! See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In this episode of Come Back with a Warrant, criminal defense attorneys Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinetz break down the latest in the Menendez brothers case: the resentencing that made Erik and Lyle Menendez parole-eligible, the parole board's denial, and what happens next.More than three decades after the 1989 shotgun killings of Jose and Kitty Menendez in Beverly Hills, the case is moving again. In May 2025, a judge resentenced the brothers to 50 years to life, making them immediately eligible for parole under California's youthful offender law. Months later, the parole board denied both brothers. Monica and Brandon explain what the board actually weighs — risk assessments, insight, prison conduct — and why a denial is not the end of the road.From a criminal defense perspective, they dig into the paths still open: the pending habeas petition built on new sexual abuse evidence, petitions to advance the next parole hearing, and the clemency question sitting with the governor. They also revisit how differently the abuse evidence would be treated in a courtroom today than it was in the 1990s trials, and how the Netflix series and a new generation of advocates turned a closed case into a national conversation.Topics covered in this episode include: the Menendez brothers case in 2026, Erik Menendez and Lyle Menendez parole hearings and denials, the 2025 resentencing to 50 years to life, California's youthful offender parole law, what the parole board considers, the pending habeas petition and new abuse evidence, clemency and the governor's role, sexual abuse evidence in murder trials then and now, Netflix's Monsters and public opinion, and the criminal defense perspective on resentencing and second chances.Listen to Come Back with a Warrant for legal commentary, criminal defense insight, true crime breakdowns, and real conversations about the justice system. Subscribe, leave a five-star review, and sign up for our weekly newsletter for more criminal defense stories, legal insight, and unfiltered courtroom commentary. Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives. YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast  Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod  TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.PodFind us everywhere and join the conversation! See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In this episode of Come Back with a Warrant, criminal defense attorneys Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinetz break down the move nobody saw coming in the Luigi Mangione case: there will be no federal trial. Instead of the two trials everyone was waiting for, on August 14 Mangione pleaded guilty in federal court to the stalking-resulting-in-death charges — an open plea to the court, with no plea deal — and his lawyers immediately used that conviction to attack the New York murder case as double jeopardy.Monica and Brandon walk through how it happened: the plea deal report that prosecutors shut down, what an open plea actually is and how federal plea practice differs from state court, and the carefully scripted allocution — the 3D-printed gun and suppressor, posing as an investor managing more than $50 billion to find UnitedHealthcare's investor conference, admitting he traveled to New York intending to shoot Brian Thompson, and tying his motive to his own experience with the healthcare system. Then why all that detail was the point: double jeopardy requires the same act, and the allocution erased any ambiguity. It's a calculated risk, because if the motion fails, his own words get used against him. The federal guidelines land between 24 and 30 years, the government is seeking life, and sentencing is set for December.From a criminal defense perspective, they dig into the statute doing the work: New York's criminal procedure law bars separate prosecutions for the same act or criminal transaction — broader than the dual sovereignty rule they covered in Part 1, and triggered only by a conviction, which is exactly what the guilty plea created. They debate the exception that will decide the motion — whether stalking and murder are statutes designed to prevent "very different kinds of harm or evil" — through their own Florida stalking and injunction practice, cover the defense's due process argument that the prosecutions were sequenced to maximize punishment, and lay out the stakes: a potentially consecutive 25-to-life state sentence versus a single federal sentence and getting out in his 50s. Plus the supporters who were already a jury problem, and the hosts' split verdict: Monica is rooting for him to see daylight, while Brandon, the former prosecutor, can't get past the family who never gets their dad back.Topics covered in this episode include: the Luigi Mangione guilty plea, open pleas, federal versus state plea practice, the allocution, the federal stalking resulting in death charges, New York's double jeopardy statute and dual sovereignty, the motion to dismiss the New York murder case, the "very different kinds of harm or evil" exception, stalking law and injunctions in Florida, the due process sequencing argument, federal sentencing guidelines, the December sentencing, the Pennsylvania case still pending, the Mangione supporters and the jury problem, and the smartest strategic plea they've covered.Listen to Come Back with a Warrant for legal commentary, criminal defense insight, true crime breakdowns, and real conversations about the justice system. Subscribe, leave a five-star review, and sign up for our weekly newsletter for more criminal defense stories, legal insight, and unfiltered courtroom commentary. 🎧 Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives. 📺 YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast 📸 Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod 🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod Find us everywhere and join the conversation! See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In this episode of Come Back with a Warrant, criminal defense attorneys Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinetz break down where the Luigi Mangione case actually stands as his murder trials approach — separating what the internet believes from what is really happening in court.Mangione is charged in the killing of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson, gunned down on a Manhattan sidewalk in one of the most polarizing prosecutions in America. He faces state murder and weapons charges in New York plus federal interstate stalking counts — and the landscape has shifted: the death penalty is off the table after the judge dismissed the death-eligible counts and the government declined to appeal, and the once-headline terrorism charge is gone too. Monica and Brandon explain dual sovereignty, why being prosecuted by the feds and the state for the same act is not double jeopardy, and which case carries the bigger risk now.From a criminal defense perspective, they walk through the suppression rulings that reshaped the case: the backpack contents and key statements thrown out because of how eight officers surrounded him in a McDonald's — and the ghost gun, suppressor, and notebook the government calls a manifesto that stayed in. They cover when Miranda actually kicks in, the $1.5 million donated defense fund and its jury-image problem, the Free Luigi movement, and the very real talk of jury nullification when a defendant has a fan base.Topics covered in this episode include: the Luigi Mangione case update, the killing of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson, state murder charges and federal interstate stalking charges, why the death penalty is off the table, dual sovereignty and double jeopardy explained, the McDonald's arrest and when Miranda rights kick in, suppressed evidence versus the ghost gun and manifesto, the Free Luigi movement and the donated defense fund, jury selection and jury nullification, and the criminal defense perspective on fighting two prosecutions at once.Listen to Come Back with a Warrant for legal commentary, criminal defense insight, true crime breakdowns, and real conversations about the justice system. Subscribe, leave a five-star review, and sign up for our weekly newsletter for more criminal defense stories, legal insight, and unfiltered courtroom commentary.🎧 Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.📺 YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast  📸 Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod  🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.PodFind us everywhere and join the conversation! See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In this episode of Come Back with a Warrant, criminal defense attorneys Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinetz break down Part 2 of the Lindsay Clancy trial: the defense case in chief, the commonwealth's rebuttal experts, the closing arguments, and the deadlocked jury — recorded live on verdict watch, with a jury note landing just as the episode wrapped.The defense built its case on experts. Dr. Paul Zeisel, the clinical and forensic psychologist who saw Lindsay within days of the killings and became her treating psychologist, delivered the money quote: she was unable to conform her behavior to the requirements of the law and had no appreciation for the wrongfulness of her act. Dr. Phillip Resnick — the country's leading expert on filicide and malingering — testified by Zoom that she was frankly psychotic at the time of the killings, like a puppet with someone else pulling the strings, and that standardized malingering testing showed she was minimizing her symptoms, not exaggerating them. A psychopharmacologist walked through the 13 medications and the missed signs of postpartum psychosis, a forensic pathologist legitimized the suicide attempt the state called performative and compressed the timeline, and the lay witnesses — her mother, her sister, and her former mother-in-law, who testified she was an excellent mother who was clearly sick — put a family's grief on the defense side of the courtroom. Plus the hospital chaplain who heard about the voices before any defense doctor ever did.Monica and Brandon explain the Massachusetts criminal responsibility standard — cognitive or volitional, and the commonwealth's burden to disprove the defense beyond a reasonable doubt, a minority rule nationally — then dig into the state's rebuttal experts, who contradicted each other's diagnoses, and the mic-drop moment when the defense read the prosecution's own opening statement to the state's final expert, who admitted it really minimizes what she was going through. From a criminal defense perspective, they break down both closings — the quarters on the prosecution's table, the family photographs, the "broken toys" line the state left the jury with — the three verdict slips and the lesser included offenses, and the Tuey-Rodriguez "dynamite" charge that reminds a deadlocked jury the burden sits entirely on the commonwealth. Then they each give their own verdict — and they don't match.Topics covered in this episode include: the Lindsay Clancy trial verdict watch, the defense case in chief, not guilty by reason of lack of criminal responsibility, postpartum psychosis and bipolar disorder, the filicide and malingering experts, altruistic filicide, the MMPI malingering test, the 13 medications and the missed diagnoses, the compressed timeline, the ex-mother-in-law and chaplain testimony, the commonwealth's conflicting rebuttal experts, the mistrial motion over religious testimony, closing argument strategy and theatrics, the verdict slips and lesser included offenses, the Tuey-Rodriguez dynamite charge versus Florida's Allen charge, hung juries and what happens after a mistrial, and the criminal defense perspective on whether the state met its burden.This is a heavy episode about mental illness, postpartum psychosis, and suicide. If you or someone you love is struggling, call or text 988, the Suicide & Crisis Lifeline.Listen to Come Back with a Warrant for legal commentary, criminal defense insight, true crime breakdowns, and real conversations about the justice system. Subscribe, leave a five-star review, and sign up for our weekly newsletter for more criminal defense stories, legal insight, and unfiltered courtroom commentary.🎧 Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.📺 YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast 📸 Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod 🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.PodFind us everywhere and join the conversation! See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In this episode of Come Back with a Warrant, criminal defense attorneys Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinetz break down Part 1 of the Lindsay Clancy trial: the state's case in chief, how the insanity defense actually works, and the question at the center of it all — was she criminally responsible?Lindsay Clancy, a 36-year-old labor and delivery nurse, is charged with three counts of first-degree murder in the January 2023 deaths of her three young children at their Massachusetts home. Nobody disputes that she caused their deaths — this trial is about criminal responsibility: whether postpartum psychosis and bipolar disorder, worsened by a cascade of psychiatric medications, left her unable to appreciate the wrongfulness of her conduct or conform it to the law. Monica and Brandon explain how the insanity defense works in Massachusetts — once the defense raises it, the commonwealth must prove criminal responsibility beyond a reasonable doubt — and why pleading it is anything but risk-free: it requires the client's actual consent, because the outcome is either prison or potentially decades in a psychiatric institution.They walk through the commonwealth's 14-day, 71-witness case piece by piece: the digital forensics timeline built from Apple Watch data and internet searches, the takeout order and CVS run the state says was a plan to get her husband out of the house, the providers who testified she showed no psychosis at 20-minute telehealth visits, the toxicology report, and the state's claim that a suicide attempt that left her paralyzed was contrived. From a criminal defense perspective, they call out what worked, what backfired — playing the 911 call, the jury view of the house, the courtroom theatrics — and the strategic gamble they cannot explain: the state resting its case in chief without a single mental health expert. Plus the motion for a required finding of not guilty, the mistrial motion, and why closings — and maybe a verdict — are just days away. Part 2 covers the defense case, the rebuttal, and the verdict.Topics covered in this episode include: the Lindsay Clancy trial in Massachusetts, three counts of first-degree murder, postpartum psychosis and bipolar disorder, the insanity defense and criminal responsibility, who really bears the burden of proof, Apple Watch data and digital forensics evidence, premeditation versus psychosis, HIPAA and why her medical records became fair game, the state's no-expert gamble, the contrived suicide argument, the 911 call and courtroom theatrics, the required finding of not guilty motion, the mistrial motion, and the criminal defense perspective on trying a mental health case.This is a heavy episode about mental illness, postpartum psychosis, and suicide. If you or someone you love is struggling, call or text 988, the Suicide & Crisis Lifeline.Listen to Come Back with a Warrant for legal commentary, criminal defense insight, true crime breakdowns, and real conversations about the justice system. Subscribe, leave a five-star review, and sign up for our weekly newsletter for more criminal defense stories, legal insight, and unfiltered courtroom commentary.🎧 Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.📺 YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast 📸 Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod 🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.PodFind us everywhere and join the conversation! See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In this episode of Come Back with a Warrant, criminal defense attorneys Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinetz break down Michael Jackson: The Verdict, the Netflix docuseries revisiting the 2005 Michael Jackson trial, and the criminal defense strategy that ended in a full acquittal on every count.The 2005 trial put the biggest star on the planet in front of a California jury on child molestation and conspiracy charges. After a trial that dominated worldwide media coverage, Michael Jackson was acquitted on every count. With the Netflix docuseries reigniting the debate and the billion-dollar Michael biopic bringing a new generation into the story, Monica and Brandon look at what actually happened inside that courtroom, not what the headlines said — including the cross-examination where a key witness swore by a magazine printed years after he ever saw Jackson.From a criminal defense perspective, they examine how the defense dismantled the prosecution's case through the accuser family's credibility problems, why superfans lying their way onto celebrity juries is a real risk, and how reasonable doubt works when public opinion has already convicted the defendant. Then they turn to the fight that is still alive: Wade Robson and James Safechuck's civil lawsuit against Jackson's companies heading to trial in 2028, why the civil burden of proof is lower, why there is no right to remain silent in a civil case, and the estate's legal war that pulled Leaving Neverland from HBO.Topics covered in this episode include: Michael Jackson: The Verdict on Netflix, the 2005 Michael Jackson trial explained, child molestation and conspiracy charges, the cross-examination that broke a key witness, jury selection and superfans on celebrity juries, reasonable doubt and the full acquittal, the Wade Robson and James Safechuck civil lawsuit and 2028 trial, civil versus criminal burdens of proof, no Fifth Amendment in civil court, the estate's fight over Leaving Neverland, and the Michael biopic's renewed interest in the case.Listen to Come Back with a Warrant for legal commentary, criminal defense insight, true crime breakdowns, and real conversations about the justice system. Subscribe, leave a five-star review, and sign up for our weekly newsletter for more criminal defense stories, legal insight, and unfiltered courtroom commentary.🎧 Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.📺 YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast  📸 Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod  🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.PodFind us everywhere and join the conversation! See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In this episode of Come Back with a Warrant, Palm Beach County criminal defense attorneys Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinetz break down one of the most infamous true crime cases in South Florida history: the Killer Clown murder of Marlene Warren.This Palm Beach County cold case dates back to 1990, when Marlene Warren was shot at the front door of her Wellington-area home by someone dressed in a full clown costume and carrying balloons, including one that read “You’re the Greatest.” For decades, the case remained unsolved and became one of the most recognizable and unsettling murder cases in Palm Beach County, Florida.Monica and Brandon discuss the facts surrounding Sheila Keen, the woman ultimately connected to the case, including the alleged affair with Marlene Warren’s husband, the white Chrysler LeBaron, the clown costume, the balloons, and the forensic evidence that helped revive the investigation years later. They also explain how cold case DNA testing changed the direction of the case and why advances in forensic technology can bring old South Florida homicide cases back to life.From a criminal defense perspective, Monica and Brandon analyze the strengths and weaknesses of the Palm Beach County prosecution. They discuss circumstantial evidence, stale witness memories, motive, identity, old evidence, search warrants, DNA testing, and the difficulty of proving a murder case decades after it happened. They also explain why a 12-year plea deal for second-degree murder may have made sense when the alternative was risking life in prison at trial.The episode also covers no contest pleas, best-interest pleas, appellate rights, gain time, Marsy’s Law, victim-next-of-kin issues, and the unusual legal issues created when the defendant later married the victim’s husband.And, of course, Monica and Brandon ask the question everyone has about this Palm Beach County true crime case: why a clown costume?Topics covered in this episode include:Palm Beach County true crimeThe Killer Clown murder caseMarlene Warren and Sheila KeenWellington, Florida cold case murderSouth Florida cold case investigationsPalm Beach County Sheriff’s Office investigationsCold case DNA evidenceCircumstantial evidence in Florida murder casesEyewitness identification issuesMotive and affair-based homicide theoriesSecond-degree murder plea dealsNo contest and best-interest pleasFlorida gain time and sentencing exposureMarsy’s Law and victim rights in FloridaWhy old cases are difficult to prove at trialHow forensic technology can reopen cold casesMonica and Brandon bring their Palm Beach County criminal defense perspective, legal analysis, and signature humor to one of Florida’s strangest true crime cases involving murder, clowns, cold case evidence, plea negotiations, and a fact pattern that still shocks South Florida decades later.🎧 Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives. 📺 YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast📸 Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod Find us everywhere and join the conversation! Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18 📞 Need help with a case in West Palm Beach?Contact The Ishak Law Firm or BD Law to discuss your options at (561) 316-8433 or (561)398-4683.  See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In this episode of Come Back With A Warrant, we dive deep into the shocking downfall of the Alexander brothers—Tal, Oren, and Alan—the high-flying celebrity real estate tycoons who built an empire selling ultra-luxury properties to billionaires. Once considered elite power brokers, they were recently convicted in Manhattan federal court on multiple counts, including federal sex trafficking. We break down how their horrific MO targeted well-situated, high-society women and college students under the guise of exclusive party culture. This isn't your typical sex trafficking case; it's a terrifying look at unchecked power, manipulation, and the brave survivors who brought them down. Key Topics Covered in This EpisodeThe Illusion of the "Locker Room": How the brothers used their wealth, influence, and attractive lifestyles to groom victims and text each other about their predatory behavior. An Unconventional Trafficking Case: Why the federal government stepped in, utilizing statutes that cover drugging, coercion, and minors without strictly requiring state-line crossing. Tracy Tudor's 2026 Civil Lawsuit: A look at the Million Dollar Listing Los Angeles star's legal action regarding a harrowing 2014 incident where she was allegedly drugged and assaulted by Oren Alexander. Inside the Manhattan Federal Court Trial: Why the defense's argument of "consensual party culture" completely collapsed under the weight of 11 testifying survivors. The Trophy Evidence: The chilling physical evidence—including saved videos and photos of incapacitated minors—that ultimately sealed the brothers' fate. Why Reporting Takes Years: An honest legal breakdown of late reporting, the power dynamics that silence victims, and the incoming wave of civil lawsuits. Federal Court Culture & Final Banter: Why we can't watch federal trials, the wild story of Michael Jackson's trial doves, and a peak behind the curtain of our podcast brainstorming sessions. Subscribe to Come Back With a Warrant, leave a five-star review, and sign up for our weekly newsletter for more criminal defense stories, legal insight, and unfiltered courtroom commentary. 🎧 Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives. 📺 YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast 📸 Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod 🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod Find us everywhere and join the conversation! Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18 📞 Need help with a case in West Palm Beach? Contact The Ishak Law Firm or BD Law to discuss your options at (561) 316-8433 or (561)398-4683. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In this episode of Come Back with a Warrant, criminal defense attorneys Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinetz break down the arrest of Andrew Tate and Tristan Tate in Miami, the UK extradition request over rape and sex trafficking charges, and what really happens when three countries want the same defendants.On July 18, 2026, U.S. Marshals arrested the Tate brothers in Miami on a request from the United Kingdom, where prosecutors have charged them with rape, sex trafficking, and related offenses stemming from allegations dating back to 2012 through 2015. Days later, the brothers appeared in Miami federal court, where they were ordered held in federal detention while they fight extradition. Monica and Brandon explain how an international extradition case actually works, from the U.S.-UK extradition treaty and the dual criminality requirement to the limited role a U.S. judge plays in deciding whether someone can be sent overseas.The episode also covers the brothers' long-running legal saga in Romania, where a human trafficking case remains pending, why they left Romania for Florida in early 2025, and how the still-open Romanian charges complicate the UK request. From a criminal defense perspective, Monica and Brandon walk through the defense strategies available in an extradition fight, why these cases can take months or even years, what detention and bail look like in federal extradition proceedings, and what the Tates' legal team is likely to argue in a South Florida courtroom.Topics covered in this episode include: the Andrew Tate and Tristan Tate arrest in Miami, the UK extradition request and the U.S.-UK extradition treaty, rape and sex trafficking charges in the United Kingdom, the international extradition process and dual criminality, federal detention and extradition hearings in Miami federal court, the Romania human trafficking case, Interpol and international arrest warrants, defense strategies in extradition proceedings, how long extradition cases take, and the criminal defense perspective on high-profile celebrity prosecutions.Listen to Come Back with a Warrant for legal commentary, criminal defense insight, true crime breakdowns, and real conversations about the justice system. Subscribe, leave a five-star review, and sign up for our weekly newsletter for more criminal defense stories, legal insight, and unfiltered courtroom commentary.🎧 Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.📺 YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast  📸 Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod  🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.PodFind us everywhere and join the conversation! See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In this episode, hosts Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinetz speak with Lauren Johnson, a partner at Rabon Kammerer Johnson in West Palm Beach, about the world of whistleblower and business litigation.Background: Before entering private practice, Lauren clerked for Justice Jorge Labarga of the Florida Supreme Court and U.S. Magistrate Judge William Matthewman in the Southern District of Florida. She talks about how these clerkships influenced her legal writing, sharpened her litigation approach, and gave her a firsthand look at how judges assess cases.Whistleblower/Qui Tam Litigation: Much of the discussion centers on False Claims Act claims — what's involved in filing a qui tam lawsuit, why such cases are typically sealed at the outset, and the process the government follows when deciding whether to step in. Lauren outlines the kind of evidence whistleblowers must present and explains how the "first to file" rule can shape the outcome of a case.Retaliation & Confidentiality: The group explores the risks whistleblowers face after coming forward, including retaliation and concerns about being blacklisted within an industry. They also touch on tactics some employers use — like severance agreements or restrictive NDA language — to keep employees quiet.Types of Fraud: Lauren walks through the range of cases her firm regularly handles, from healthcare and Medicare/Medicaid billing fraud to false certifications, safety violations, and business conflicts tied to contracts, non-compete agreements, and improper computer access.Civil/Criminal Crossover: The conversation also covers areas where civil disputes overlap with criminal law, such as illegal recordings, hacking accusations, and business conflicts that carry potential criminal exposure.Rapid-Fire Segment: To wrap up, Lauren offers quick answers on manipulative executive behavior, risky email phrasing, things professionals should avoid putting in writing, and warning signs to watch for in business litigation.Guest: Lauren Johnson, Esq. Firm: Rabon Kammerer Johnson Location: West Palm Beach, Florida For more info: https://www.complexbusinesslitigation.com/professionals/lauren-johnson/ Subscribe to Come Back With a Warrant, leave a five-star review, and sign up for our weekly newsletter for more criminal defense stories, legal insight, and unfiltered courtroom commentary. 🎧 Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives. 📺 YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast 📸 Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod 🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod Find us everywhere and join the conversation! Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18 📞 Need help with a case in West Palm Beach? Contact The Ishak Law Firm or BD Law to discuss your options at (561) 316-8433 or (561)398-4683. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In this episode of Come Back with a Warrant, Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinetz break down the Gilgo Beach murders, the investigation into Rex Heuermann, and the legal issues surrounding one of the most disturbing modern serial killer cases in the United States.The conversation covers the Long Island cold case that began in 2010, when multiple victims were discovered near Gilgo Beach. Monica and Brandon discuss how the victims were targeted, why sex workers and vulnerable women are often overlooked in criminal investigations, and how the case remained unsolved for years before new forensic developments helped investigators connect the evidence.They also examine Rex Heuermann’s arrest in July 2023 and his guilty plea on April 8, 2026, exactly 1,000 days later. The episode explores the avalanche of evidence against him, including DNA evidence, witness descriptions, his Chevy Avalanche, documentation referred to as a “blueprint” of the crimes, and the now-infamous pizza crust DNA evidence that helped corroborate the investigation.From a criminal defense perspective, Monica and Brandon explain why some cases become damage-control cases, why forensic evidence can be extremely difficult to overcome, and why a plea may become the only realistic path when the evidence is overwhelming. They also discuss how multiple similar acts can be used to show modus operandi, pattern, planning, and identity in serial crime prosecutions.The episode also touches on civil lawsuits filed by victims’ families, potential wrongful death claims, proceeds from media interviews or books, and the question of whether family members of an offender can face civil liability. Monica and Brandon also discuss the FBI Behavioral Science Unit, serial killer profiling, and the risks of giving violent offenders a platform.Topics covered in this episode include:The Gilgo Beach murdersRex Heuermann and the Long Island serial killer caseCold case investigationsDNA evidence and forensic technologyPizza crust DNA evidenceThe role of victim vulnerability in criminal investigationsSex workers and victim credibilityModus operandi and similar fact evidenceSerial killer profiling and the FBI Behavioral Science UnitPlea deals in high-evidence murder casesWrongful death lawsuits after criminal convictionsCivil liability and victims’ familiesThe criminal defense perspective on overwhelming evidenceMonica and Brandon bring their criminal defense insight to a true crime case that raises serious questions about policing, victim advocacy, forensic evidence, plea negotiations, and how the justice system handles serial homicide cases.Listen to Come Back with a Warrant for legal commentary, criminal defense insight, true crime breakdowns, and real conversations about the justice system.Subscribe to Come Back With a Warrant, leave a five-star review, and sign up for our weekly newsletter for more criminal defense stories, legal insight, and unfiltered courtroom commentary. 🎧 Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives. 📺 YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast📸 Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod Find us everywhere and join the conversation! Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18 📞 Need help with a case in West Palm Beach?Contact The Ishak Law Firm or BD Law to discuss your options at (561) 316-8433 or (561)398-4683.  See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Probation can look like a break from jail — but in Florida criminal cases, it can also become one of the fastest ways to end up back in custody.In this episode of Come Back With a Warrant, criminal defense attorneys Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinetz break down probation from the legal side: how people end up on probation, what probation conditions really mean, how violations happen, and why a “good deal” is not always as good as it sounds.Monica and Brandon explain the difference between general and special conditions of probation, technical violations, material violations, restitution issues, new law violations, drug and alcohol testing, travel restrictions, early termination, and final violation of probation hearings. They also discuss why probation officers have so much power, why violations can lead to no-bond warrants, and why the lower burden of proof at a VOP hearing can make these cases especially risky.The episode also covers real courtroom stories, including defendants running from court, probation violations based on new arrests, DUI probation issues, driving while license suspended, sex offender probation violations, and the difficult choice between jail time and long-term supervision.Topics include:• What probation means in criminal court• Jail vs. probation plea offers• General conditions vs. special conditions• Technical vs. material probation violations• Why VOP warrants are often no bond• Final violation of probation hearings• Lower burden of proof in VOP cases• Restitution, court costs, and ability to pay• DUI probation, treatment, and testing• Travel restrictions and probation modifications• Early termination of probation• Why probation can be a gift, a curse, or bothThis episode is for entertainment and educational purposes only and is not legal advice. If you are facing a criminal charge, probation violation, warrant, DUI, VOP, or any other criminal case, speak with a qualified criminal defense attorney in your jurisdiction.Subscribe to Come Back With a Warrant, leave a five-star review, and sign up for our weekly newsletter for more criminal defense stories, legal insight, and unfiltered courtroom commentary. 🎧 Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives. 📺 YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast📸 Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod Find us everywhere and join the conversation! Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18 📞 Need help with a VOP case in West Palm Beach?Contact The Ishak Law Firm or BD Law to discuss your options at (561) 316-8433 or (561)398-4683.  See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In this episode of Come Back With a Warrant, criminal defense attorneys Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinetz break down the Randy Herman case, the Palm Beach County murder case featured in Hulu’s documentary Dead Asleep. The case centered on one unusual and controversial defense: sleepwalking.Monica and Brandon discuss the death of Brooke Preston, Randy Herman’s confession, the defense theory that he may have been sleepwalking, and why the case ultimately turned on questions of intent, timeline, forensic evidence, and whether the sleepwalking defense was reasonable under the facts.Unlike many murder trials where the defense argues mistaken identity or lack of proof that the defendant committed the act, the issue in this case was different. Randy Herman admitted that he was the person standing over Brooke’s body with the knife, but claimed he had no memory of the killing. That meant the defense had to focus on whether he was conscious, aware, and capable of forming the intent required for first-degree murder.Monica and Brandon analyze the key facts from the case, including the 25 stab wounds, the surveillance footage, the text messages, the neighbor who heard screams, the timeline between Randy and Brooke’s interaction and the killing, and the prosecution’s argument that there was not enough time for Randy to fall into the type of deep sleep required for the sleepwalking defense.They also discuss the defense expert, how juries evaluate what is “possible” versus what is “reasonable,” and why the State’s trial strategy was effective. Instead of arguing that sleepwalking as a defense was impossible or ridiculous, prosecutors focused on the facts of this case and why the evidence did not support that theory.This episode also touches on trial strategy, reasonable doubt, premeditation, motive, intoxication, emotional rage, jury perception, courtroom appearance, and how criminal defense attorneys decide which defense theory gives a client the best chance at trial.Topics CoveredRandy Herman caseBrooke Preston caseHulu Dead Asleep documentaryDead Asleep case breakdownSleepwalking murder defenseSleepwalking criminal defensePalm Beach County murder caseFlorida murder trialFirst-degree murder defenseIntent in murder casesPremeditation in criminal lawReasonable doubtPossible vs. reasonable defense theoriesCriminal defense trial strategyForensic timeline evidenceSurveillance footage in criminal casesText messages as evidenceNeighbor witness testimonyConfession in a murder caseNo memory defenseCriminal intent and consciousnessSleepwalking expert testimonyDefense expert cross-examination25 stab wounds evidenceOverkill in murder casesMotive in murder trialsRage killing theoryIntoxication and criminal defenseJury perceptionCourtroom appearance and biasDefendant clothing at trialPublic defender trial strategyPalm Beach County criminal defenseFlorida criminal defense podcastMonica IshakBrandon DinetzCome Back With a Warrant 🎧 Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives. 📺 YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast📸 Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod Find us everywhere and join the conversation! Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18 📞 Need help with a DUI case in West Palm Beach?Contact The Ishak Law Firm or BD Law to discuss your options at (561) 316-8433 or (561)398-4683.  See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In this episode of Come Back With a Warrant, criminal defense attorneys Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinetz break down what happens when someone is arrested for the first time and wants the case dismissed, sealed, expunged, or removed from their record.Monica and Brandon explain the difference between diversion, plea deals, deferred prosecution agreements, pretrial intervention, plea in pass agreements, DUI diversion, drug court, veterans court, mental health court, and other alternatives that can sometimes help a person avoid the full consequences of a criminal prosecution.They also discuss why diversion can be a major win in a criminal case, especially when it gives a client a path to dismissal without having to take the risk of trial. But they also explain that not every diversion program works the same way. Some programs require no admission of guilt, while others may involve a plea, probation, court conditions, restitution, treatment, or a withhold of adjudication.This episode also covers one of the most common questions criminal defense lawyers get: “Can I get this off my record?” Monica and Brandon explain the difference between expungement and sealing in Florida, why a dismissal matters, why a withhold of adjudication matters, and how a conviction can prevent someone from getting a case removed from their record.They also talk about the frustrating reality that even when a case is dismissed, sealed, or expunged, private websites, news outlets, mugshot pages, YouTube videos, Facebook groups, and third-party companies may still keep arrest information online. In other words: sometimes the criminal case is legally gone, but the internet does not forget.Topics CoveredDiversion in criminal casesDeferred prosecution agreementsDPA criminal case meaningPretrial interventionPlea in pass agreementsDUI diversion in Palm Beach CountyReckless driving reduction from DUIWithhold of adjudicationAdjudication vs. withholdDrug court diversionVeterans courtMental health courtCompetency in criminal casesFirst time offender programsDomestic violence diversionFTOP domestic violence casesRestitution in diversion agreementsCommunity service and court costsTheft course and anger managementTrial risk vs. diversionClient control and plea decisionsPublic defender vs. private attorney strategyFirst-time arrest in FloridaHow to get a case dismissedNolle prosequiNo file decisionExpungement in FloridaSealing a criminal record in FloridaDifference between sealing and expungementCan a dismissed case still show up online?Mugshots and public recordsWhy arrests stay onlinePrivate websites and criminal recordsHow a criminal case can follow you 🎧 Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives. 📺 YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast📸 Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod Find us everywhere and join the conversation! Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18 📞 Need help with a DUI case in West Palm Beach?Contact The Ishak Law Firm or BD Law to discuss your options at (561) 316-8433 or (561)398-4683.  See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In this episode of Come Back With a Warrant, criminal defense attorneys Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinetz sit down with Iris Eytan, a criminal defense attorney with nearly 30 years of experience handling high-stakes and complex criminal cases, including murder trials. Iris is also the founder and CEO of Protect Ethical Prosecutors, an organization focused on addressing prosecutorial misconduct, increasing accountability, and protecting the integrity of the criminal justice system.This conversation goes deep into what happens when prosecutors stop acting as ministers of justice and start treating criminal cases like games to be won at all costs. Iris shares how her career evolved from public defense and civil rights advocacy into complex criminal defense work, and how repeated experiences with hidden evidence, high-profile cases, and alleged prosecutorial misconduct ultimately pushed her to leave practicing law and focus on systemic reform.Monica, Brandon, and Iris discuss the emotional weight of defending clients in cases where the evidence does not add up, the pressure prosecutors face in high-profile cases, and why concealing favorable evidence can destroy lives, harm victims, and undermine public trust in the justice system. Iris also explains why prosecutor accountability is so difficult, including the role of prosecutorial immunity and the lack of meaningful consequences when misconduct occurs.The episode also covers the Barry Morphew case, the founding mission behind Protect Ethical Prosecutors, the difference between tough prosecution and unethical prosecution, and why fairness — not conviction rates — should be the true measure of success in the criminal justice system.Topics CoveredProsecutorial misconductEthical prosecutorsProtect Ethical ProsecutorsIris EytanMonica IshakBrandon DinetzCome Back With a WarrantWrongful convictionsCriminal defense attorneyPublic defender experienceHigh-profile criminal casesHidden evidence in criminal casesExculpatory evidenceFavorable evidenceBrady violationsProsecutor accountabilityProsecutorial immunityAbsolute immunity for prosecutorsMisconduct in murder casesBarry Morphew caseSuzanne Morphew caseCriminal justice reformWrongful imprisonmentDNA evidence and alternate suspectsPublic trust in the justice systemEthics over winningMinister of justiceProsecutors and conviction cultureWhy prosecutors should disclose evidenceHow misconduct affects victims and defendantsSystemic reform in criminal law 🎧 Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives. 📺 YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast📸 Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod Find us everywhere and join the conversation! Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18 📞 Need help with a DUI case in West Palm Beach?Contact The Ishak Law Firm or BD Law to discuss your options at (561) 316-8433 or (561)398-4683.  See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In this episode of Come Back With a Warrant, criminal defense attorneys Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinetz break down one of the most misunderstood concepts in criminal law: the difference between probable cause and proof beyond a reasonable doubt.A lot of people assume that being arrested means the government already has enough evidence to convict someone. But as Monica and Brandon explain, those are two very different legal standards. Probable cause is the lower standard police need to make an arrest, conduct certain searches, or support a warrant. Beyond a reasonable doubt is the much higher standard prosecutors must meet at trial to convict someone of a crime.Monica and Brandon discuss how probable cause can be challenged at different stages of a criminal case, including first appearance, through motions to suppress, and in challenges to search warrants. They also explain why these challenges can be difficult, especially early in a case when the defense may only have limited information, such as the probable cause affidavit or initial police report.The episode also dives into the importance of the pre-file stage in criminal defense. Monica and Brandon explain why hiring a private criminal defense attorney early can make a major difference before formal charges are filed. They discuss how mitigation, communication with prosecutors, and early advocacy can sometimes lead to reduced charges, better offers, or even no-file decisions.They also cover trial strategy, jury instructions, reasonable doubt, motions to suppress, Franks motions, search warrants, prosecutorial discretion, and why criminal defense attorneys must balance zealous advocacy with objective case analysis.Topics CoveredProbable cause vs. beyond a reasonable doubtWhat police need to arrest someoneWhat prosecutors need to convict someoneWhy an arrest does not equal guiltHow probable cause is challenged in criminal courtFirst appearance hearings and bond argumentsSearch warrants, arrest warrants, and affidavitsMotions to suppress evidenceFranks motions and false statements in warrant affidavitsThe Fourth Amendment and criminal defenseWhy early legal representation mattersThe pre-file stage in Florida criminal casesHow prosecutors decide what charges to fileBurglary vs. trespass charging decisionsMitigation packets and reduced chargesPublic defender vs. private attorney involvement pre-fileReasonable doubt at trialJury instructions and closing argumentsWhy jurors may assume someone is guilty just because they were arrestedHow defense attorneys prepare for trialMaintaining objectivity as a criminal defense lawyer 🎧 Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives. 📺 YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast📸 Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod Find us everywhere and join the conversation! Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18 📞 Need help with a DUI case in West Palm Beach?Contact The Ishak Law Firm or BD Law to discuss your options at (561) 316-8433 or (561)398-4683.  See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

If you’ve been charged with a crime in West Palm Beach or South Florida… this episode matters.Because what happens in your case isn’t just about the facts.👉 It’s about the judge, your lawyer, and how your case is presented in court.In this episode of Come Back with a Warrant, criminal defense attorneys Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinetz break down what most people don’t realize:⚖️ Judges are human.⚖️ They have patterns.⚖️ And how your lawyer navigates that can directly impact your outcome.⚖️ What You’ll Learn (And Why It Matters to You)Why knowing your judge can change your case outcomeHow experienced lawyers adjust arguments based on the judgeWhat happens at your first appearance (bond hearing)Why some arguments help—or hurt—you—depending on the judgeWhat a “trial tax” is (and when it might apply)Why some lawyers stay quiet in court—and why that’s strategic🚨 The Truth Most People Don’t KnowNot all judges approach cases the same way.Some are:More strict on certain chargesLess receptive to certain argumentsAlready forming opinions early in the caseThat’s why hiring a lawyer who:✔️ Practices in Palm Beach County regularly✔️ Knows the judges, prosecutors, and courtroom dynamics✔️ Understands what to say—and what NOT to say…can make a real difference in your case.👔 What You Do Matters TooYour outcome isn’t just about your lawyer.Judges pay attention to:How you dress in courtWhether you’re respectful and preparedHow you behave at the podiumEven small things—like being on time and dressed appropriately—can impact how your case is viewed.⚠️ Common Mistakes That Hurt Your CaseTalking when your lawyer is speakingTrying to “explain yourself” directly to the judgeDressing inappropriately for courtHiring a lawyer who doesn’t practice in your jurisdictionThese mistakes can negatively affect your credibility before your case even begins.📍 Why This Matters in West Palm BeachIn Palm Beach County, the legal community is tight-knit.Judges:Recognize attorneys they trustNotice preparation and professionalismPay attention to patterns—both from clients and lawyersThat means your choice of attorney—and how your case is handled—matters more than you think.🎯 If You’re Facing Criminal ChargesYou need more than just a lawyer.You need someone who:Knows the local court systemUnderstands how judges thinkCan strategically position your case from day one 🎧 Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.📺 YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast📸 Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod Find us everywhere and join the conversation! Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18 📞 Need help with a DUI case in West Palm Beach?Contact The Ishak Law Firm or BD Law to discuss your options at (561) 316-8433 or (561)398-4683.  See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Harvey Weinstein’s criminal cases continue to shape the future of sexual assault prosecutions in America.In this episode of Come Back with a Warrant, criminal defense attorneys Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinetz break down the Harvey Weinstein retrial, the Me Too movement, and the legal issues that caused Weinstein’s New York conviction to be overturned.The discussion covers:Harvey Weinstein’s rise to power in HollywoodThe allegations that sparked the Me Too movementHow prosecutors built the original New York caseWhy the appellate court reversed Weinstein’s convictionThe controversy surrounding “prior bad acts” evidenceHung juries and mistrials in the retrialThe role of pattern evidence in sexual assault prosecutionsThe balance between victim testimony and a defendant’s right to a fair trialComparisons to Jeffrey Epstein, Bill Cosby, Roger Ailes, and the Alexander brothersMonica and Brandon explain the legal concept of propensity evidence, why appellate courts closely review judicial discretion, and how these rulings could impact future high-profile sex crime cases in New York and beyond.The episode also explores broader issues involving consent, NDAs, abuse of power, prosecutorial strategy, witness credibility, and the challenges of defending or prosecuting cases involving multiple accusers. Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinetz trust StoryLeads with their own LinkedIn content because the team knows how to take strong voices and turn them into posts that build credibility, start conversations, and bring the right people closer. Listeners of Come Back With a Warrant can connect with StoryLeads to schedule a LinkedIn content strategy call or claim 3 free LinkedIn posts written for their voice, practice area, and ideal client. For lawyers ready to stop lurking, start posting, and build a LinkedIn presence with teeth, StoryLeads is the move.Book a call and claim 3 free LinkedIn posts here: https://calendly.com/parker-storyleads/storyleads-linkedin-strategy-session-with-parker?month=2026-05 Mention “Come Back With a Warrant” when reaching out. 🎧 Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.📺 YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast📸 Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod Find us everywhere and join the conversation! Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18  See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Alex Murdaugh’s murder conviction has officially been overturned — and the reason has shocked the legal world.In this episode of Come Back with a Warrant, criminal defense attorneys Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinetz break down the South Carolina Supreme Court’s decision to reverse Murdaugh’s double homicide conviction and order a brand-new trial.The conversation covers the original murder case, the financial crimes that prosecutors used as motive evidence, the cellphone and kennel video evidence placing Murdaugh at the scene, and the courtroom misconduct allegations surrounding former court clerk Becky Hill.Monica and Brandon explain:Why jury tampering allegations became so seriousWhat the “Remmer standard” means in criminal appealsWhy Becky Hill’s comments to jurors mattered legallyWhether the prosecution went too far using financial crimes as evidenceHow retrials work after a conviction gets overturnedWhether Alex Murdaugh should testify againWhy this retrial may be even harder for the defenseThey also discuss broader issues involving jury impartiality, courtroom ethics, appellate reversals, and how high-profile murder cases can unravel years later because of procedural mistakes.If you’ve followed the Alex Murdaugh trial, Netflix documentaries, or true crime coverage, this episode gives you the legal analysis behind the headlines. This episode of Come Back With a Warrant is sponsored by StoryLeads — the LinkedIn ghostwriting team helping lawyers turn their expertise, opinions, courtroom instincts, and real-world experience into content that actually commands attention. StoryLeads is built for attorneys who know they should be posting on LinkedIn but do not have the time, energy, or desire to write another watered-down “legal update” that sounds like it came from a compliance committee. No stiff legal jargon. No recycled thought leadership. No corporate fluff in a suit. StoryLeads helps lawyers, law firm owners, litigators, trial attorneys, criminal defense attorneys, personal injury lawyers, and legal professionals build authority on LinkedIn with sharp, strategic, human content that sounds like them — just cleaner, stronger, and harder to scroll past.Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinetz trust StoryLeads with their own LinkedIn content because the team knows how to take strong voices and turn them into posts that build credibility, start conversations, and bring the right people closer. Listeners of Come Back With a Warrant can connect with StoryLeads to schedule a LinkedIn content strategy call or claim 3 free LinkedIn posts written for their voice, practice area, and ideal client. For lawyers ready to stop lurking, start posting, and build a LinkedIn presence with teeth, StoryLeads is the move.Book a call and claim 3 free LinkedIn posts here: https://calendly.com/parker-storyleads/storyleads-linkedin-strategy-session-with-parker?month=2026-05 Mention “Come Back With a Warrant” when reaching out. 🎧 Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.📺 YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast📸 Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod Find us everywhere and join the conversation! Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18  See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

What happens after repeated arrests, prison sentences, and addiction—and finally deciding to change your life?In this episode of Come Back with a Warrant, criminal defense attorneys Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinetz sit down with William Freeman, founder of People of Purpose, to discuss addiction, incarceration, reentry, and the realities of the Florida criminal justice system.After 84 arrests and 4 prison sentences, William made a life-changing decision while incarcerated. Today, he helps hundreds of formerly incarcerated individuals rebuild their lives through housing support, mentorship, employment assistance, and community programs throughout Palm Beach County and South Florida.Topics covered in this episode include:Florida prison conditions and incarceration realitiesAddiction and repeated criminal chargesPlea deals and why people plead just to leave jailHow different Florida counties handle criminal casesPalm Beach County reentry resourcesCriminal records, court costs, and barriers after releaseMental health, addiction, and the criminal justice systemBreaking generational cycles of incarcerationWhat actually helps people stay out of jail long termWilliam shares how a 30-year addiction cycle led to repeated incarceration and how education, mentorship, structure, and purpose helped transform his life. He also explains how People of Purpose now supports more than 800 individuals with housing assistance, identification documents, employment opportunities, transportation, and reentry support.This conversation also explores larger issues within the South Florida criminal justice system, including:Why some counties are harsher than othersHow prosecutors and judges can affect case outcomesWhy incarceration alone often fails to address addictionThe importance of support systems after releaseIf you or someone you know is facing criminal charges in West Palm Beach or South Florida, understanding how the criminal justice system works can make a major difference.Support People of Purpose:🌐 peopleofpurposefl.org📧 wfreeman@peopleofpurposefl.orgThey accept:Clothing donationsFurnitureFinancial contributionsCommunity support🎟 Come Back with a Warrant Networking Mixer:https://www.eventbrite.com/e/network-like-you-mean-it-the-comeback-tickets-1987684507870This episode is sponsored by StoryLeads, the LinkedIn ghostwriting team helping lawyers, litigators, criminal defense attorneys, and law firm owners build authority online with strategic content tailored to their voice and practice area.Book a strategy call and claim 3 free LinkedIn posts:https://calendly.com/parker-storyleads/storyleads-linkedin-strategy-session-with-parker?month=2026-05🎧 Follow Come Back with a Warrant for legal commentary, criminal defense insights, courtroom stories, and podcast updates.📺 YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast📸 Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.PodSubscribe to the newsletter:https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18📞 Need help with a criminal case in West Palm Beach?Contact The Ishak Law Firm or BD Law at:(561) 316-8433(561) 398-4683 See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Want more clients without spending thousands on ads?In South Florida—especially in West Palm Beach—the answer is simple:👉 Networking.In this episode of Come Back with a Warrant, criminal defense attorneys Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinetz break down how networking actually works in the real world—and how it can directly impact your income, referrals, and long-term business growth.This episode is a must-listen for:Lawyers in Palm Beach CountyBusiness owners and entrepreneursYoung professionals looking to grow their networkAnyone tired of relying on cold leads or paid ads⚖️ What You’ll LearnHow to build a referral-based business in South FloridaWhy networking is essential in the West Palm Beach legal and business communityThe difference between surface-level networking vs. real relationship buildingHow one connection can lead to multiple opportunities and referralsWhy consistent follow-up (lunches, coffee, events) matters more than you thinkHow networking improves not just your business—but your client outcomes📍 Why Networking Matters in West Palm BeachSouth Florida is a relationship-driven market.Most business comes from word-of-mouth referralsThe legal and professional community is smaller than it seemsYour reputation and visibility directly affect your growthIf you’re not actively networking—you’re missing opportunities.🚀 Take It Offline: Join Us in West Palm BeachWe’re not just talking about networking—we’re creating the space for it.🎟 Come Back with a Warrant Networking Mixer📅 May 21, 2026⏰ 5:30 PM – 7:30 PM📍 Shanghai’d (NEW restaurant on Clematis Street, West Palm Beach)This event is designed for:Lawyers and legal professionalsEntrepreneurs and business ownersYoung professionals building their networkAnyone looking to make real, high-value connectionsWhat to expect:A curated room of professionals (not random crowds)Organic conversations (no forced networking)Real opportunities for collaboration and referralsDrinks, light bites, and CBWAW merch⚠️ Spots are limited and expected to sell out👉 Get your ticket here: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/network-like-you-mean-it-the-comeback-tickets-1987684507870 🎧 Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.📺 YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast📸 Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod Find us everywhere and join the conversation! Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18  See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Can you get a DUI if you weren’t even driving?In Florida—especially here in West Palm Beach and South Florida—the answer might surprise you.In this episode of Come Back with a Warrant, criminal defense attorneys Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinitz break down one of the most misunderstood areas of Florida DUI law: what actually counts as “driving.”With Memorial Day weekend approaching, this is essential listening if you plan on going out, boating, or celebrating.⚖️ What You’ll Learn in This EpisodeWhat “actual physical control” means under Florida DUI lawWhy you can get a DUI while parked or sleeping in your carWhether you can get a DUI on a golf cart, scooter, bicycle, or horseThe difference between a DUI (driving under the influence) and a BUI (boating under the influence)How prosecutors prove DUI cases in Palm Beach County courtsWhat happens if you refuse a breath test in Florida (new law updates)Real case examples where DUI charges were fought and dismissed🚨 2025–2026 Florida DUI Law UpdatesWe also cover key changes affecting drivers in West Palm Beach and throughout Florida, including:Increased penalties for BUI manslaughterNew consequences for refusing breath testsEnhanced penalties tied to controlled substancesHow DUI charges can escalate quickly—even for first-time offenders💸 The Real Cost of a DUI in South FloridaA DUI is more than just a charge—it can impact your:Driver’s licenseInsurance ratesEmployment opportunitiesCriminal record (permanent in Florida)Many DUI cases cost $10,000+ when you factor in fines, classes, and legal fees.📍 Why This Matters in West Palm BeachSouth Florida is one of the most active areas for DUI and BUI enforcement, especially around:Holidays (like Memorial Day, New Year’s, and Spring Break)Boating events and waterfront gatheringsLate-night dining and nightlife areasLaw enforcement is actively looking for impaired drivers—and many arrests happen when people think they’re being “safe.”🎯 If You’ve Been Arrested for DUI in West Palm BeachEvery case is fact-specific. Even if you think:“I wasn’t driving”“I was just parked”“There’s no proof”There may still be defenses available.🎧 Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.📺 YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast📸 Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod Find us everywhere and join the conversation! Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18 📞 Need help with a DUI case in West Palm Beach?Contact The Ishak Law Firm or BD Law to discuss your options at (561) 316-8433 or (561)398-4683.  See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In this episode of Come Back with a Warrant, Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinetz break down one of the most controversial true crime cases in modern history: Making a Murderer — and the convictions of Steven Avery and Brendan Dassey.After being wrongfully imprisoned for 18 years and later exonerated by DNA, Steven Avery filed a multi-million dollar lawsuit against law enforcement. Just two years later, he was charged again — this time for the murder of Teresa Halbach.But what turned this case into a national debate wasn’t just the evidence — it was the confession of Brendan Dassey.A 16-year-old with cognitive limitations, interrogated without a lawyer or parent present, whose statements became central to the prosecution.🔑 What We Cover:The timeline of Steven Avery’s wrongful conviction and second arrestThe controversy surrounding Brendan Dassey’s confessionPolice interrogation tactics — and when they cross the lineHow false confessions happen (especially with juveniles)The legal standard: what makes a confession “voluntary”?The difference between moral belief vs. legal burden of proofClaims of evidence tampering and chain of custody issuesWhy this case still divides public opinion years later⚖️ Key Legal Issues:Voluntariness of Confessions: Was Brendan’s confession truly voluntary under the “totality of the circumstances”?Juvenile Protections: How age, IQ, and lack of counsel impact constitutional rightsPolice Tactics: Law enforcement can legally lie during interrogations — but should they?Burden of Proof: Even if something feels wrong… did the state still meet its burden?💡 Key Takeaways:Confessions are powerful — but not always reliable.Juveniles are significantly more vulnerable during interrogations.The legal system doesn’t decide what feels true — only what can be proven.Even controversial cases can still meet the legal threshold for conviction.This case highlights the tension between justice and procedure. Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.📺 YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast📸 Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod Find us everywhere and join the conversation! Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18  See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

What happens when family law and criminal law collide?In this two-part episode of Come Back with a Warrant, Monica Ishak and Brandon sit down with experienced family law attorney Heather Stolman to break down the real-life chaos that unfolds when divorce, custody battles, and domestic violence allegations intersect with the criminal justice system.From “he said, she said” domestic violence cases to strategic use of injunctions in family court, this conversation exposes how legal strategy, emotion, and evidence all collide—and sometimes backfire.⚖️ WHAT YOU’LL LEARNThe key differences between family court vs criminal court standardsWhy domestic violence cases are so difficult to proveHow allegations can impact divorce, custody, and time-sharingWhen people use domestic violence claims as legal leverageHow judges determine the “best interest of the child”The role of evidence, text messages, and video footage in courtWhy DCF recommendations don’t always control custody decisionsThe reality of no-contact orders, injunctions, and overlapping casesHow mental health and guardianship intersect with criminal casesWhat lawyers see behind the scenes in the most complex family disputes🔥 REAL TOPICS DISCUSSEDDomestic violence cases as “he said, she said” battlesThe strategic use (and misuse) of restraining orders and injunctionsCustody complications when criminal charges are pendingThe impact of video evidence vs allegations in court“Baby mama drama,” paternity disputes, and high-conflict co-parentingThe psychological realities of abuse, fear, and recanting statementsHow multiple legal systems (family, criminal, guardianship) can overlap🎯 WHY THIS MATTERSThese cases aren’t just legal—they’re emotional, strategic, and often life-altering.Understanding how family law and criminal law interact can make the difference between protecting your rights and unintentionally hurting your case.📌 KEY TAKEAWAYWhen family and criminal cases overlap, everything becomes more complicated—and what you say, text, or file in one court can directly impact the other. Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.📺 YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast📸 Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod Find us everywhere and join the conversation! Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18  See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In this episode of Come Back with a Warrant, Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinetz sit down with veteran South Florida family law attorney Heather Greenhill Stohlman to unpack the complex — and often chaotic — intersection of family law and criminal law.With over 20 years of experience, Heather shares what really happens behind divorce cases, custody battles, and domestic violence allegations — including how these cases often overlap with criminal charges and Department of Children and Families (DCF) involvement.From high-conflict divorces to allegations used as leverage, this episode dives into the emotional, strategic, and legal realities attorneys face when families break down.🔑 What We Cover:How family law and criminal law cases overlap (more than you think)When domestic violence allegations are real vs. used as leverageThe role of DCF, guardian ad litems, and the courts in protecting childrenWhy judges are getting smarter about manipulation in family courtWhat actually qualifies as a legal “emergency” in family lawThe emotional impact of divorce and litigation on childrenHow attorneys navigate highly sensitive abuse allegationsFinancial abuse and new legal remedies in family courtThe reality of litigating custody when addiction, mental health, or crime is involvedWhy family law is anything but “just divorce”💡 Key Takeaways:Family court is often a strategic battlefield — not just emotional.Domestic violence claims can significantly impact custody and leverage in litigation.Children are often the most affected — and sometimes unintentionally used as leverage.Not everything is an “emergency” in court — and misusing that label can hurt your case.Collaboration between criminal and family law attorneys is critical in overlapping cases.🎙️ About Our Guest:Heather Greenhill Stohlman is a founding partner of Greenhill Stohlman, P.A., with over two decades of experience in marital and family law. She focuses on complex cases involving financial analysis, custody disputes, and high-conflict litigation, often working alongside forensic accountants, therapists, and other experts to support her clients. Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.📺 YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast📸 Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod Find us everywhere and join the conversation! Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18 See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In this episode of Come Back With A Warrant, Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinetz break down cross-examination—the trial skill that can change the entire case in the middle of trial. They explain how defense attorneys can win cases without calling a single witness by using the government’s witnesses to build reasonable doubt and tell the defense story through tight, controlled questions.🧠 What you’ll learnWhy cross-examination is an art (and how it becomes your “conversation with the jury”)How defense wins without a case-in-chief: no burden + strategic crossThe golden rule: never ask a question you don’t know the answer toHow to cross a police officer in “after-the-fact” cases (like domestic calls)The difference between misdemeanor cross vs major investigation cross (DUIs, violent felonies, detectives)How to expose what a witness didn’t see, didn’t do, or left outDemeanor matters: don’t go “hot” unless the jury gives you permissionHow judges stepping in can destroy a witness’s credibility in front of jurorsWhy “smoking gun” movie moments are rare—and when to save it for closingImpeachment: the most satisfying (and effective) cross tool when done rightBonus: jury panels, mistrials, and why retrials often benefit the prosecution⚖️ Key takeawayCross-examination is one of the fastest ways to create reasonable doubt—through conflicts in evidence, lack of evidence, and credibility problems—without ever putting your own witness on the stand. Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.📺 YouTube:  @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast📸 Instagram:  @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod                                                                                             Find us everywhere and join the conversation!                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18   See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

What this episode is about 🤝In this episode of Come Back With A Warrant, Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinetz break down why collaboration over competition is one of the most underrated strategies in the legal industry—especially for criminal defense lawyers and solo firm owners.Key topics covered ✅Why “competing for cases” is a short-term mindset—and what the long game actually looks likeHow to choose the right collaborators (alignment, trust, goals, and business model)The role ego plays in keeping lawyers isolated (and why that hurts growth)How collaboration builds credibility, reputation, and referral power in a small legal communityCo-counseling across jurisdictions: why local knowledge + trial strategy = better outcomesThe danger of “cheap lawyer” branding and race-to-the-bottom pricingWhy talking badly about other lawyers damages your own brand more than theirsHow collaboration ultimately benefits clients: more eyes, stronger strategy, better serviceTakeaway 💡Collaboration isn’t just “being friendly.” It’s a business strategy, a reputation builder, and a client-focused advantage—when you do it with the right people. Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.📺 YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast📸 Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod Find us everywhere and join the conversation! Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18  See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In Episode 3 of the Come Back With a Warrant Epstein Files series, Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinetz tackle the conspiracy theories surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s death, the Epstein files, and the larger questions the public still can’t shake.We break down the biggest theories people are debating right now—from whether Epstein is truly dead, to whether he was murdered, to the “body swap” theory that gained new attention after online posts and investigative interest tied to the jail where he was held.We also revisit why Epstein’s role as a potential kompromat collector matters: if he held compromising material on powerful people, that creates strong motives for keeping him alive, silencing him, or preventing a trial from ever happening.Finally, we talk about how misinformation, AI, and narrative control make it harder than ever to separate fact from viral fiction—and why doing your own research matters in a case this big.Topics We CoverRecap of Episodes 1–2 and how we got here in the Epstein Files seriesThe core question: Is Epstein dead or alive?If he’s dead: suicide vs. homicide and why so many people question the official storyThe federal facility where Epstein died (MDC) and why the “camera failure” explanation fuels skepticismThe independent autopsy dispute and why it matters to public trustThe body swap theory and why it keeps resurfacingWhy Epstein’s “tools to disappear” (fake passports, diamonds) matter to the debateKompromat: what it is and why it changes the motive analysisThe theory that Epstein was connected to intelligence networks (CIA/Mossad/Russia) and what would make him “too valuable”“Coded language” theories (pizza/jerky, etc.) and how to approach claims criticallyHow AI and fake videos/photos are muddying the waters in real timeGhislaine Maxwell, reputation laundering, and the role of “philanthropy as cover” (ex: Terramar)Why this story won’t end: ongoing releases, global fallout, and unanswered questionsKey Questions We ExploreWhy would Epstein be “worth” protecting—or eliminating?If kompromat existed, where is it now and who controls it?Why are major pieces of evidence still missing or redacted?How do you separate real information from viral misinformation in 2026? Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.📺 YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast📸 Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod Find us everywhere and join the conversation! Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18  See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In Episode 2 of the Come Back With a Warrant Epstein Files series, Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinetz dig into the latest Epstein file releases and what they actually reveal.Millions of pages of documents tied to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell are being released to the public following new transparency measures. But instead of one simple “list,” the files contain emails, depositions, witness statements, investigative materials, and civil litigation records spanning years of investigations.In this episode, we break down where these documents come from, how to interpret the names appearing in them, and why Epstein’s connections to powerful industries and institutions continue to raise questions.We also discuss the concept of kompromat—the idea that Epstein may have collected compromising material on influential individuals—and how that theory fits into the broader allegations surrounding his network.Finally, we explore Epstein’s connections to Ghislaine Maxwell, her father Robert Maxwell, and the powerful circles Epstein operated within, from global finance to politics.Topics CoveredWhat the Epstein Files Transparency Act means and why documents are now being releasedThe types of records included in the Epstein files:Civil lawsuitsDepositionsVictim statementsFBI investigative materialsEmails and communicationsWhy being named in the files does not automatically mean someone committed a crimeEpstein’s connections to powerful individuals across finance, tech, and politicsThe concept of kompromat and how compromising material can be used for leverageAllegations about surveillance systems inside Epstein’s propertiesEpstein’s unusual connections to the Department of JusticeThe role of Kathryn Ruemmler and negotiations involving international banking investigationsThe influence of Ghislaine Maxwell and her father Robert Maxwell, a controversial media tycoonHow Epstein’s network expanded internationallyWhy the case evolved from a Palm Beach investigation to a global scandalKey Questions We ExploreWhy were so many powerful people connected to Epstein?What role did Ghislaine Maxwell play in expanding Epstein’s network?Did Epstein collect compromising material on influential figures?Why are so many documents still redacted?Will more people ever be prosecuted?Coming Next: Episode 3In the final episode of the series, Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinetz tackle the conspiracy theories surrounding Epstein.They’ll break down:Which theories have actual evidence behind themWhich ones have already been debunkedThe biggest unanswered questions that still remain Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.📺 YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast📸 Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod Find us everywhere and join the conversation! Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18  See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinetz kick off a three-part deep dive into Jeffrey Epstein and the Epstein files by starting where the public story first breaks open: Palm Beach County. This episode walks through how the investigation began in 2005, why the Palm Beach Police Department believed they had a strong case, and how the process shifted when the State Attorney’s Office chose a grand jury route that produced only one solicitation charge. They then unpack how the case moved to federal authorities, why Epstein’s defense team became pivotal, and how a federal non-prosecution agreement ultimately shielded Epstein—and “named and unnamed” co-conspirators—from federal charges.Key Topics CoveredWhy listeners requested Epstein—and why Palm Beach’s role mattersThe 2005 origin story: Royal Palm Beach High School incident leads to a police tipPalm Beach Police Department interviews 30+ victims and identifies a recruiting “pipeline”Florida law and consent: why minors legally cannot consent (even if they appear to agree)The State Attorney’s Office decision to use a grand jury—and why that raised eyebrowsWhy a grand jury usually indicts easily (“ham sandwich” concept) and what went differently hereHow witness credibility was attacked (MySpace/social media) and why volume/pattern evidence mattersSearch warrants executed after the case is already “hot”—and evidence appears removedWho likely knew about the warrants (and why “tip-offs” are central to the controversy)The case gets sent to the FBI / federal authorities “over the head” of state prosecutorsEpstein’s “super defense team,” the Acosta meeting, and how the federal case disappearsThe non-prosecution agreement: plea to state charges + federal immunity for co-conspiratorsVictims’ rights: how victims were not notified and later litigation under the Crime Victims’ Rights ActEpstein’s sentence and special privileges: work release, travel, and unusually lenient enforcementBigger takeaway: how power, money, and influence can distort outcomes in the justice systemPreview of Episode 2: document dumps, co-conspirators, and falloutNotable Takeaways / Key MomentsThe investigation allegedly revealed a consistent pattern: massage → undressing → escalationThe episode highlights a legal tension: minors recruited other minors, blurring roles socially—but not legallyA major theme: evidence appears to have been removed before warrants were servedEpstein’s post-plea reality contrasts sharply with typical sex-offender supervision and restrictions This episode discusses allegations of sexual abuse involving minors, exploitation, and failures within the justice system. Listener discretion advised. Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.📺 YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast📸 Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod Find us everywhere and join the conversation! Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18  See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In this episode of Come Back With A Warrant, Brandon Dinetz and Monica Ishak break down consciousness of guilt—the “guilty mind” argument prosecutors use when a defendant’s post-incident behavior looks suspicious. They explain how the State uses circumstantial evidence like fleeing, disposing evidence, lying to police, and DUI refusals to argue: “Why would an innocent person do that?”They also cover what the State cannot use as consciousness of guilt—like invoking the right to remain silent, requesting a lawyer, or searching for an attorney—because those are protected by the 5th and 6th Amendments.To illustrate how powerful (and limited) this evidence can be, they discuss the Casey Anthony case, including the prosecution’s reliance on circumstantial evidence like internet searches (chloroform), alleged forensic indicators, and post-event lies—alongside the defense’s ability to create reasonable doubt (including issues like a shared family computer).In this episode, we cover:What consciousness of guilt means in criminal casesThe difference between mens rea (criminal intent) and post-crime behavior evidenceCommon examples: running from police, leaving the scene, disposing evidence, lyingDUI examples: refusing breath/blood tests and why prosecutors highlight refusalsWhat the State cannot argue (silence, lawyer requests, attorney searches)Casey Anthony as a case study in circumstantial proof and reasonable doubtWhy consciousness-of-guilt evidence is often subjective and jury-dependentHow defense attorneys “break apart” the State’s narrative to create reasonable doubtLeave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.📺 YouTube:  @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast📸 Instagram:  @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod                                                                                             Find us everywhere and join the conversation!                                                                                                                                                                                                              Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18   See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Justice isn’t equal — and if you’ve ever wondered why wealthy defendants seem to glide through the criminal system while others get crushed by it, this episode breaks it down step-by-step, without politics and without sugarcoating.Monica and Brandon pull back the curtain on the two-tier system they’ve seen firsthand: where money buys time, options, experts, strategy, and most importantly — freedom.This is an honest conversation about the uncomfortable truth:The richer you are, the better your odds.                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.📺 YouTube:  @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast📸 Instagram:  @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod                                                                                             Find us everywhere and join the conversation!                                                                                                                                                                                                              Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18  See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Every lawyer starts out awkward. Every legal career is messy. And the glow-up only happens when you stop pretending you’re supposed to have it all figured out.In this episode of Come Back With A Warrant, Monica and Brandon pull back the curtain on the real career journey lawyers go through — the pivots, the panic, the identity crisis, and the breakthroughs that shape who you become in this profession.                                                                                                                                                         Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.📺 YouTube:  @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast📸 Instagram:  @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod                                                                                             Find us everywhere and join the conversation!                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18   See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In this episode of Come Back With A Warrant, Monica and Brandon unpack a hard truth:Innocent people run. Innocent people confess. Innocent people plead guilty.Not because they’re criminals — but because fear, trauma, and pressure make people deeply, painfully human.This is a conversation about psychology, survival instinct, and a system that often punishes people for how they react when they’re scared.                                                                      Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.📺 YouTube:  @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast📸 Instagram:  @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod                                                                                             Find us everywhere and join the conversation!                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18   See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Florida sentencing is a world where your future is determined by math, multipliers, and a spreadsheet that can send you to prison based on points you didn’t even know you had. Two people can commit the same crime — and walk away with wildly different outcomes.In this episode, Monica and Brandon break down how sentencing really works in Florida:why the score sheet matters so much, how enhancements can double or triple your sentence, and when judges actually have the power to show mercy.If you’ve ever wondered why someone got probation while someone else got years, this episode is for you.                                                                                                  Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.📺 YouTube:  @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast📸 Instagram:  @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod                                                                                             Find us everywhere and join the conversation!                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18   See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Florida’s self-defense laws are famous, controversial, and wildly misunderstood. “Stand Your Ground” gets thrown around in arguments, news stories, and viral videos — but very few people actually understand what the law does and does not protect.In this episode, Monica and Brandon dig into the reality behind the headlines:What counts as reasonable fear?When is deadly force legal?How does race change the way these laws are applied?And why do so many people think Stand Your Ground is a permission slip for violence?If you live in Florida (or just watch Florida in the news), this is the deep dive you didn’t know you needed.                                                                                             Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.📺 YouTube:  @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast📸 Instagram:  @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod                                                                                             Find us everywhere and join the conversation!                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18  See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

This episode is for anyone who has ever watched a viral arrest video and screamed at their phone — or for anyone who’s ever heard someone say “I do not consent to this stop!” while the window is still up.Monica and Brandon take a hilarious-but-accurate deep dive into entrapment myths, sovereign citizen arguments, fake legal scripts, TikTok attorney wannabes, and the massive gap between “internet law” and actual law.”If you’ve ever wondered what’s legal, what’s nonsense, and what will definitely get you arrested, buckle up.                                                                                               Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.📺 YouTube:  @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast📸 Instagram:  @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod                                                                                             Find us everywhere and join the conversation!                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18  See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In this powerful and eye-opening episode, Monica and Brandon sit down with attorney Isai Bonilla, a criminal defense and immigration lawyer who lives and works every day at the intersection of two systems most people never see collide—until they’re in the middle of it.Crimmigration — the overlap of criminal charges and immigration consequences — is one of the most misunderstood and explosive areas of law in the country. And right now, especially in Florida, the stakes are higher than ever.Isai breaks down what really happens when someone without status (or with pending status) is arrested, why ICE holds appear, how quickly things can escalate, and the devastating reality that even winning your criminal case doesn’t mean your immigration fight is over.                                                                                                                                                                                                         Contact Isai Bonilla for your crimmigration needs:                                                                                                                                   📺 YouTube:  @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast📸 Instagram:  @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod                                                                                             Find us everywhere and join the conversation!                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates:  See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

This week, Monica and Brandon break down five huge cases currently shaping criminal justice across the country — touching everything from religious rights behind bars to guns and weed, probable cause in a post-marijuana world, and even whether a defendant can talk to their lawyer during an overnight break.If you want to know where the law is heading in 2026, this is the episode to listen to.                                                                                                                                                  Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.📺 YouTube:  @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast📸 Instagram:  @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod                                                                                             Find us everywhere and join the conversation!                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18   See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In this episode, Monica and Brandon dive into one of the most misunderstood areas of criminal law: who is actually allowed to use force, when they’re allowed to use it, and why citizens get arrested for things they think are “helping.”From police use of tasers and takedowns to everyday people tackling shoplifters, this conversation breaks down the actual legal standards behind force, reasonableness, and citizen’s arrest — especially in Florida.If you’ve ever watched a viral arrest video and wondered “Is that legal?”, this episode is for you.                                                                                                                        Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.📺 YouTube:  @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast📸 Instagram:  @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod                                                                                             Find us everywhere and join the conversation!                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18  See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

It’s the most wonderful time of the year — unless you’re a porch pirate, a drunk driver, or someone who thinks booby-trapping your front porch is “totally legal.”This week, Monica and Brandon unwrap the wild world of holiday crimes, breaking down the real laws behind the season’s messiest moments. From Home Alone traps to office-party DUIs, we’re covering the naughty list from top to bottom.Whether you’re here for legal education, chaos, or both — this episode delivers.                                                                                                                                                    Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.📺 YouTube:  @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast📸 Instagram:  @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod                                                                                             Find us everywhere and join the conversation!                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates:  See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

People think criminal defense lawyers are the least ethical.In reality, we’re the most watched, tested, and policed attorneys in the system.In this episode, Monica and Brandon break down the tightrope every defense lawyer walks — where one mistake can cost your license, not just your case. From bar exams and background checks to trust accounts and client secrets, nothing in this job is off the ethics radar.  They unpack the double standards and real scandals (including a locally infamous cocaine smuggling case). Resource For Attorneys: Florida Bar Ethics Hotline https://www.floridabar.org/ethics/ethotline/                                                                                             Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.📺 YouTube:  @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast📸 Instagram:  @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod                                                                                             Find us everywhere and join the conversation!                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18  See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In this powerful and deeply human conversation, Brandon and Monica sit down with Lyric White — a devoted mother, wife, and criminal justice advocate whose life took a dramatic turn after her husband’s incarceration. What began as heartbreak has evolved into purpose as Lyric now uses her voice, her education, and her lived experience to push for meaningful reform in a system that impacts millions of families. This episode is for anyone seeking insight into the real human cost of incarceration, the resilience of single mothers, and the power of turning pain into advocacy. If Lyric’s story moved you, you can support her family and others facing similar journeys by donating at https://300letters.org/donate/                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.📺 YouTube:  @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast📸 Instagram:  @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod                                                                                             Find us everywhere and join the conversation!                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Is the hardest part of being a criminal defense attorney the law… or your clients?Monica and Brandon unpack the chaos of client control — when emotions, pride, and panic take the wheel. From clients who reject plea deals to prove a point, to the ones fighting addiction, denial, or delusion, this episode dives into what it really takes to manage the people behind the cases.They share war stories (including a first-degree misdemeanor that went very sideways), talk about mental health, burnout, and the emotional gymnastics of being both lawyer and therapist.Because sometimes, it’s not the trial that breaks you — it’s the client.                                                                                                                                                                    Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.📺 YouTube:  @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast📸 Instagram:  @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod                                                                                             Find us everywhere and join the conversation!                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18  See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Monica and Brandon put artificial intelligence on trial — from Zoom court chaos to AI-written briefs that got lawyers sanctioned.They break down how tech is reshaping the courtroom: AI tools for lawyers and judges, virtual witnesses, and what happens when the human element gets lost behind the screen.It’s smart, funny, and a little unsettling — justice has officially gone digital.                                                                                                                                                          🎙️Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.📺 YouTube:  @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast📸 Instagram:  @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod                                                                                             Find us everywhere and join the conversation!                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18  See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Monica and Brandon get real about the chaos of running their own law firms — no bosses, no backup, just pure grit (and caffeine).They share what law school didn’t teach: building a brand, handling hate comments, balancing clients and content, and betting everything on yourself.It’s messy, funny, and 100% honest — welcome to the solo attorney grind.                                                                                                                                                                 Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.📺 YouTube:  @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast📸 Instagram:  @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod                                                                                             Find us everywhere and join the conversation!                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18  See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Monica and Brandon break down Florida’s Fall 2025 criminal-law updates in plain English. We cover why refusing your first DUI breath test is now its own misdemeanor and how the “probable cause beyond a reasonable doubt” wrinkle could confuse juries and reshape diversion and plea talks. We talk Florida’s open-carry reality (and where private businesses can still say no), the new “super-speeder” crime for 100+ mph or 50+ over, and fresh tech-era offenses: felony deepfake porn, tougher penalties for online luring, and felony non-consensual tracking with AirTags. We hit cyber-harassment for profit, enhanced penalties for threats to judges and prosecutors, mandatory restitution in leaving-the-scene cases (and the causation fights that invites), plus a new death-penalty aggravator tied to trafficking vulnerable victims resulting in death. Practical takeaway: know your rights, know your risks, and check your county’s policies before decisions snowball.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.📺 YouTube:  @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast📸 Instagram:  @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod                                                                                             Find us everywhere and join the conversation!                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18  See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Monica and Brandon put the death penalty on the stand—what it is, who qualifies, and how Florida changed the rules after Parkland.They walk through Phase 1 (guilt) and Phase 2 (penalty), break down aggravating vs. mitigating factors, and explain why a prosecutor’s notice of intent sets the whole machine in motion. From money and appeals to victims’ families and politics, this is the unfiltered look at how a case moves from a headline to a death-row decision. It’s heavy, human, and brutally honest: death is never automatic, and the system is anything but simple.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.📺 YouTube:  @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast📸 Instagram:  @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod                                                                                             Find us everywhere and join the conversation!                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18  See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Monica and Brandon sit down with Fabiola VanOtteren, a former courtroom probation officer who’s seen everything—from wild excuses to creative attempts at cheating drug tests.Fabiola pulls back the curtain on what it’s really like to supervise defendants, work side-by-side with prosecutors and defense attorneys, and keep a straight face when chaos unfolds in court.As fate would have it, she was the courtroom probation officer during the days when Monica and Brandon were fierce rivals in court—so yes, there are stories.Expect equal parts comedy and candid insight as the trio talk about:The most unbelievable excuses probationers actually try to use 😅How people attempt (and fail) to cheat drug tests 💉What makes a “good” probationer vs. a nightmare case 📋How courtroom dynamics between defense, prosecution, and probation really work ⚖️The human side of probation: burnout, empathy, and the surprising wins 💛If you’ve ever wondered what happens after sentencing—or how probation can go so right (or so wrong)—this episode gives you the real story from someone who’s lived it.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              🎙️Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.📺 YouTube:  @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast📸 Instagram:  @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod                                                                                             Find us everywhere and join the conversation!                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18  See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Monica and Brandon turn the mic over to the audience in this Q&A edition of Come Back with a Warrant. From pre-arrest investigations to the snitch factor, no topic is off-limits. Real listener questions, raw lawyer answers—served with insight, honesty, and a little courtroom sass. Got a burning question of your own? Drop it on any of our social media platforms and it just might make the next episode. 🎙️Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.📺 YouTube:  @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast📸 Instagram:  @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.PodFind us everywhere and join the conversation!                                                                                                                                                                                                               Subscribe to our newsletter for episode guides and latest pod updates: https://come-back-with-a-warrant-podcast.kit.com/fe483fdf18  See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Where’s the line between your First Amendment rights and a criminal charge? Monica and Brandon dive into the messy divide between protected speech, hate speech, and when words themselves can land you in court. 🎙️Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.📺 YouTube:  @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast📸 Instagram:  @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.PodFind us everywhere and join the conversation! See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

The knock hasn’t come yet—but the cops are already building a case. Monica and Brandon break down what happens in a pre-arrest investigation, what it means to be “a person of interest,” and how to protect yourself before charges ever drop. 🎙️Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.📺 YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast 📸 Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod 🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.PodFind us everywhere and join the conversation! See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Jury duty isn’t just waiting around with a number. From voir dire to deliberations, Monica and Brandon pull back the curtain on what lawyers are really looking for during jury selection—and what jurors can expect once they’re sworn in. It’s the courtroom from both sides of the box. Love the show? Don’t miss an episode — hit follow or subscribe wherever you listen! 🎙️Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.📺 YouTube:  @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast📸 Instagram:  @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.PodFind us everywhere and join the conversation! See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

On this episode of Come Back with a Warrant, Monica and Brandon take on one of the most controversial topics in criminal law: sexual relationships between teachers and students. They explore where the law draws hard lines, how power dynamics complicate the idea of consent, and why not every case should be treated with the same brush. From scandal to sentencing, the conversation challenges assumptions about punishment, accountability, and what justice really looks like when authority and youth collide.  Love the show? Don’t miss an episode — hit follow or subscribe wherever you listen! 🎙️Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.📺 YouTube:  @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast📸 Instagram:  @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.PodFind us everywhere and join the conversation! See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In this episode of Come Back with a Warrant, Monica and Brandon unpack how the content we post—or that happens to be out there—can significantly impact legal proceedings. From criminal charges to public scrutiny, social media has quietly (and sometimes explosively) become a central player in modern courtrooms.Featured Cases:Marlena Velez (Florida TikTok Influencer): The 22-year-old posted a haul video of items allegedly shoplifted from Target, wearing the same outfit seen on store surveillance. That viral clip helped police link her to the crime, leading to her arrest.Mr. Put a Girl On & Heston James: These cases illustrate how social media can spark investigations, sway public perception, and even influence prosecutorial decisions, showing just how quickly online clout can collide with courtroom reality.This episode blends real-world examples with legal insight, showing why every post, like, or video can echo far beyond the screen—sometimes straight into the courtroom. Love the show? Don’t miss an episode — hit follow or subscribe wherever you listen! 🎙️Leave us a 5 Star Review! Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives.📺 YouTube:  @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast📸 Instagram:  @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.PodFind us everywhere and join the conversation! See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Brandon and Monica welcome their first guest—and it’s personal. Trial lawyer, business owner, and Brandon’s wife, Jennifer Dinetz joins the show to share: The viral courthouse proposal story that started it all Her rise as one of Florida’s top young attorneys The “only in Florida” gator case that made it to Jeopardy! Love, law, and a little bit of chaos—this episode has it all.👉 If you have been injured, make sure to reach out to Jennifer Dinetz at ND Law. Learn more here: ndinjurylawfirm.com/attorneys/jennifer-dinetz🎙️ Love the show? Don’t miss an episode — hit follow or subscribe wherever you listen! ⭐ Leave us a 5-Star Review!📺 YouTube: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast 📸 Instagram: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod 🎵 TikTok: @ComeBackWithAWarrant.PodFind us everywhere and join the conversation! See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Monica and Brandon unpack how Florida’s Marcy’s Law shapes domestic violence cases — and why the truth in court often looks nothing like the headlines. From false accusations to real dangers, they reveal what really drives which cases get fought, dropped, or won.                                                                                                                               Love the show? Don’t miss an episode — hit follow or subscribe wherever you listen! 🎙️📺 YouTube: Watch full episodes, behind-the-scenes, and clips you can’t get anywhere else. @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast📸 Instagram: Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives. @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod🎵 TikTok: Quick tips, case breakdowns, and the law explained in under 60 seconds. @ComeBackWithAWarrant.PodFind us everywhere and join the conversation! See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Think being a lawyer is all surprise witnesses and last-minute breakthroughs? Think again. Monica and Brandon pull back the curtain on the real legal grind — the strategy, the slog, and the moments that never make it to the big screen.                                                                                                                                                               Love the show? Don’t miss an episode — hit follow or subscribe wherever you listen! 🎙️📺 YouTube: Watch full episodes, behind-the-scenes, and clips you can’t get anywhere else. @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast📸 Instagram: Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives. @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod🎵 TikTok: Quick tips, case breakdowns, and the law explained in under 60 seconds. @ComeBackWithAWarrant.PodFind us everywhere and join the conversation! See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Monica and Brandon get real about the decision that shaped their careers — leaving the prosecution table to stand beside the accused. From moral crossroads to courtroom battles, they share the moments that changed their views on justice and why they believe everyone deserves a fierce advocate.                                          Love the show? Don’t miss an episode — hit follow or subscribe wherever you listen! 🎙️📺 YouTube: Watch full episodes, behind-the-scenes, and clips you can’t get anywhere else. @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Podcast📸 Instagram: Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and a peek into our lawyer lives. @ComeBackWithAWarrant.Pod🎵 TikTok: Quick tips, case breakdowns, and the law explained in under 60 seconds. @ComeBackWithAWarrant.PodFind us everywhere and join the conversation! See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

In this debut episode of Come Back with a Warrant, meet your hosts—Monica Ishak and Brandon Dinetz—two former courtroom opponents turned podcast partners. We’re criminal defense lawyers with wildly different backstories, but one thing in common: we’re obsessed with the messy, fascinating, and sometimes ridiculous world of criminal law.We kick things off by sharing: How we met (spoiler: it involved a courtroom and some friendly competition) Our journeys into criminal defense, from prosecution to solo practice What we’ve learned—and unlearned—along the way Why this podcast isn’t just for lawyers This show is for anyone who’s ever binge-watched a true crime doc, questioned what their rights really are, or wondered what it’s actually like to be a defense attorney on the front lines.Get ready for war stories, legal hot takes, behind-the-scenes breakdowns, and a lot of personality.Welcome to Come Back with a Warrant—we’re just getting started.🎙️ Love the show? Don’t miss an episode — hit follow or subscribe wherever you listen!📺 YouTube: Watch full episodes, behind-the-scenes, and exclusive clips 📸 Instagram: Follow us for legal hot takes, episode updates, and lawyer life 🎵 TikTok: Quick tips, case breakdowns, and law explained in under 60 secondsFind us everywhere and join the conversation! See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Ever wonder if cops can really do that? Or why someone would take a plea deal if they’re innocent?Come Back With a Warrant is a bold, no-BS criminal defense podcast hosted by two former courtroom rivals turned co-hosts. Monica Ishak (former public defender) and Brandon Dinetz (former prosecutor) pull back the curtain on the legal system…one real case, viral moment, and wild courtroom story at a time. With sharp insight and unapologetic wit, they break down your rights, challenge legal myths, and go where most lawyers won’t. Whether you’re law-curious, true crime–obsessed, or just want the drama without the fluff, this is your front-row seat to how criminal law actually works. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.