Filtrar por gênero

The Irish Question

The Irish Question

The Irish Question

We talk about the questions and topics that everyone is thinking about but most are afraid to say out loud. We don't hold back. We are not told what we can and can't say. You won't agree with everything we say, but we guarantee you the truth, honesty and a very unique podcast. SIgn up to all our social media platforms so we can build a group of like minded people

40 - Why is Ireland So Woke?
0:00 / 0:00
1x
  • 40 - Why is Ireland So Woke?

    Why is Ireland so Woke? would Fine Gael moving to the centre-right actually change anything?

    Former Fine Gael councillor and dentist Keith Redmond joins Paul Treyvaud, Elaine Mullally and Nick Delehanty for a lively debate about Simon Harris, the direction of Irish politics and the growing role of the State.

    Keith and Elaine clash over public-sector strikes: do frontline workers deserve better pay, or should reform come before another across-the-board increase? The panel also discusses pressure on small businesses, media coverage of crimes involving asylum seekers, and demands for clearer crime statistics.

    Plus: Community Notes and the fact-checkers, Simon Harris’s call for scrutiny of public spending, funding for advocacy NGOs, and what happened to Benefacts—the organisation that tracked Ireland’s nonprofit sector.

    Finally, the panel challenges the framing of the “manosphere” as a public-health issue, debates Mary McAleese’s comments on infant baptism, and asks whether a smaller State could deliver better outcomes.

    Join the debate in the comments, subscribe, and share the episode.

    TIMESTAMPS

    00:00 Welcome and last week’s audience milestone
    01:08 Introducing guest Keith Redmond
    01:45 Simon Harris under pressure: polls and party tensions
    08:40 Fine Gael’s centre-right motion: real change or political spin?
    14:08 Leadership, paternity leave and political accountability
    16:40 Public-sector strikes: the case for better pay
    18:39 Keith pushes back: spending, staffing and affordability
    21:39 Small businesses, employment costs and the tax burden
    24:54 Frontline workers versus across-the-board pay rises
    28:08 Tralee, IPAS and changing media coverage
    34:01 The debate over crime statistics and country of origin
    39:25 Community Notes, fact-checkers and Harris’s spending pledge
    42:53 NGO funding, political advisers and accountability
    49:45 What happened to Benefacts—and could it return?
    51:58 The manosphere: public-health issue or an attack on masculinity?
    59:40 Anakin Skywalker and young men online
    1:00:46 Elaine’s Poland mini-podcast
    1:01:10 Mary McAleese, baptism and parents’ rights
    1:04:47 Nick’s closing argument for a smaller State
    1:05:37 Final thoughts and farewell

    #TheIrishQuestion #IrishPolitics #SimonHarris #FineGael #KeithRedmond

    Tue, 03 Nov 2026 - 1h 06min
  • 39 - Constitutional Coup in Poland?

    Poland's Constitutional Crisis: A Deep DiveUnderstanding the Constitutional TribunalFilip Styczynski outlines the role of the constitutional tribunal in Poland, likening it to a court that ensures laws passed by parliament align with the constitution. Currently, Poland is experiencing significant political turmoil, with allegations that Prime Minister Donald Tusk has overstepped legal boundaries in an attempt to assert control over this tribunal. In a move reminiscent of authoritarian tactics, Tusk reportedly sent riot police to take over the court while President Karol Nierowski was out of the country, causing a major constitutional crisis.The political landscape in Poland has been shaken by a constitutional crisis that raises serious questions about the rule of law and democracy. In this mini-episode, Elaine Mullally engages with experts Filip Styczynski and Sebastian Meitz to unpack the complexities of the current situation.A Clash of LeadershipThe conflict between President Nierowski and Prime Minister Tusk stems from a power struggle that has evolved since the elections last year. Sebastian Meitz explains, "The current government is actually using whatever means they have in their power to overthrow a constitutional body." He describes Tusk’s actions as a potential ‘constitutional coup,’ highlighting a trend of undermining democratic institutions that began with the takeover of public broadcasting a few years back.The Role of MediaBoth speakers lament the lack of coverage by mainstream media, pointing out that crucial events are often ignored or downplayed. Elaine notes, "Mainstream media are bought by our government... they're not there to represent the people." This absence of reliable information hampers public awareness and discourse around the ongoing crisis.The Future of Polish DemocracyAs the situation develops, concerns grow about the government’s intentions and the possibility of further undermining democratic norms. Meitz warns that if the current trajectory continues, the very foundations of Polish democracy could be at risk. The discussion underscores the importance of vigilance in safeguarding democratic institutions and the need for transparent dialogue among political leaders.This mini-episode offers a crucial lens on the unfolding events in Poland, highlighting the delicate balance between power, law, and democracy. For those interested in understanding the implications of this crisis, the full episode provides deeper insights and analysis.

    Sun, 01 Nov 2026 - 40min
  • 38 - Is All Hope Lost? Guest Host: Ivan Yates

    Is Ireland heading towards another fiscal crisis—and who is prepared to take responsibility?

    Ivan Yates joins Nick Delehanty, Paul Treyvaud and Elaine Mullally on The Irish Question for a frank discussion about public spending, political accountability, housing, immigration and the future of Irish media.

    The former politician, businessman and broadcaster explains why he believes Ireland is building permanent spending commitments on unreliable tax revenues, describes the current Dáil as the worst he has seen, and sets out what he would change as Taoiseach.

    There’s also a spirited debate over the triple lock and neutrality, his account of the controversy surrounding podcast regulation, and practical lessons from his new book, The Game of Life and How to Win.

    What would YOU change first if you were Taoiseach? Let us know in the comments, and subscribe for more from The Irish Question.

    TIMESTAMPS

    00:00 Welcome to The Irish Question
    00:43 Ivan Yates and The Game of Life and How to Win
    04:39 “A Garda wouldn’t ask me that!” — Nick tests Ivan’s advice
    05:35 Turning contacts into relationships
    06:27 How do you get a politician sacked?
    14:39 Welfare, public spending and Ivan’s fiscal warning
    19:02 Mainstream media, housing statistics and RTÉ
    26:56 What is a fiscal crisis?
    28:05 “The worst Dáil I’ve ever seen”
    32:05 The triple lock, defence spending and sovereignty
    34:11 Ivan’s case on neutrality and Ireland’s defence responsibilities
    41:30 If Ivan were Taoiseach: housing, planning and infrastructure
    45:41 What the hosts would change: NGOs, energy and public spending
    50:25 Leadership and renewable energy planning
    52:20 Ivan’s views on immigration
    53:38 Media power and the future of podcast regulation
    55:38 Ivan’s experience with Coimisiún na Meán
    56:38 Have Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael abandoned their core voters?
    1:02:13 Ivan reflects on life, politics and Ireland’s future
    1:06:26 A racing tip and final thoughts

    Tue, 27 Oct 2026 - 1h 08min
  • 37 - What is a Woman? Challanging the Trans Debate

    Elaine Mullally sits down to have a conversation with Sall Grover, founder of the app Giggle, as she shares her journey navigating the contentious landscape of gender identity and women's rights. In a recent conversation, she reflects on her legal battles and the implications for women-only spaces.Birth of Giggle Sall Grover's journey began with the creation of Giggle, a social networking app designed exclusively for women. Grover describes it as a space where women could connect on various topics, from motherhood to politics. "It was a really lovely space... I was honored to run it," she shares. However, this endeavor led to unexpected legal challenges when a man attempted to access the app, prompting a significant legal battle that would test the limits of gender identity laws.Pivotal Legal BattleThe case, known as Tickle versus Giggle, became a landmark for gender identity discrimination. Grover faced accusations after removing a user who claimed to be a woman from the app. Despite her efforts, the Australian High Court recently declined to hear the case, leaving Grover to grapple with the financial and emotional fallout. "One of the positives that has come out of this case is that while we may have lost in the court of law, we have won... in the court of public opinion," she reflects.The Challenge of Advocacy In her discussion, Grover highlights the difficulty of maintaining hope in the face of systemic challenges. "Nothing prepares you for how much energy it takes to not become a really cynical person," she notes. Yet, she remains optimistic about the future of women's rights and the importance of public discourse. "We just need to make sure... that women were still included in the one piece of legislation in the country that was created for us."Address MisconceptionsGrover also addresses common misconceptions surrounding gender identity, particularly the narrative that sex is not binary. "Intersex is actually an incredibly outdated term... it doesn’t make you a third sex," she asserts. This underscores her belief in the importance of biological definitions in discussions about gender and rights.Call for ClarityThe conversation delves into the implications of current gender ideologies on societal norms, especially regarding children and education. Grover argues against the notion of fluid gender identity being taught in schools, emphasizing the need for clarity and protection of vulnerable groups. "There’s a fear among parents... that there is a serious push within our school system," she cautions.In the end, Grover’s journey is not just about one app or one legal case; it is about the broader struggle for women's rights in an evolving societal landscape. As she continues to advocate for clarity and women's spaces, her story serves as a poignant reminder of the ongoing conversation surrounding gender and identity. For a deeper dive into Sal Grover's insights and experiences, listen to the full episode.

    Chapters

    00:00Introduction to Sal Grover and her background

    02:13The creation of Giggle for Girls and its purpose

    04:00The incident with the man claiming to be a woman on the app

    06:06The legal case: Tickle versus Giggle and its significance

    07:59The Australian High Court's decision and its implications

    10:54The societal and legal challenges of gender identity laws

    13:08The debate over intersex and sex binary concepts

    16:08The influence of gender ideology on language and law1

    9:04The importance of free speech and public opinion in societal change

    21:58The role of activism and speaking out against gender laws

    24:53The future of women's rights and societal debates

    29:53Sal Grover's ongoing fight and call for support

    Wed, 21 Oct 2026 - 37min
  • 36 - Is Ireland Next?

    Is Ireland learning the right lessons from France? Are trade unions demanding policies their own members will have to pay for? And why is supporting young families so far down the political agenda?

    Paul Treyvaud, Elaine Mullally and Nick Delehanty return for a packed episode of The Irish Question, covering immigration, Ireland’s demographic future, public-sector strikes, gender legislation, climate politics and more.

    The discussion opens with the tragic church accident in Ecuador before turning to footage of unrest in France. The panel debates integration, political leadership and social cohesion, asking what Ireland should learn from the experiences of other European countries.

    Nick then discusses the Irish Government’s long-term demographic projections: falling fertility, an ageing population and the role of migration in sustaining the workforce. The conversation turns to housing costs, the pressures facing young couples and whether government should do more to make starting a family affordable. Paul proposes redirecting resources towards parents, while Elaine argues that decades of housing and economic policy have undermined family life.

    A lively disagreement follows over public-sector strikes and the role of trade unions. Elaine makes the case for supporting nurses, teachers, prison officers and other workers seeking better pay. Nick challenges the unions’ wider spending and taxation agenda, discussing school meals, schoolbooks, childcare, welfare, carbon taxes and proposals affecting self-employed PRSI. Paul asks whether the self-employed should organise their own response, before the panel considers the relationship between public-sector pay and productivity.

    On immigration and accommodation, Elaine discusses a renewed planning application in Durrow, County Laois, and calls for ministers to engage directly with local residents. Nick questions whether changes to IPAS spending represent an overall reduction in costs or a shift towards larger centres and other accommodation budgets. The discussion also covers sentencing, freedom of expression, reporting restrictions and the panel’s concerns about equal treatment before the law.

    The hosts examine Ruth Coppinger’s proposed gender-recognition changes, including the proposed use of an “X” marker on official documents and birth certificates. They debate parental decision-making, children’s interests, the Government’s likely response and the wider influence of campaigning organisations and academia on policy.

    Internationally, the panel discusses British military-readiness warnings, the war in Ukraine and the possibility of negotiations involving Trump, Putin and Xi. They then turn to Mary Robinson’s comments on gender and climate leadership, Greta Thunberg’s activism, Irish climate targets and Nick’s argument that affordable energy deserves greater political priority.



    00:00 Welcome & the tragic church accident in Ecuador
    02:02 Unrest in France: what should Ireland learn?
    11:27 Falling birth rates, immigration & Ireland’s future
    16:32 Welfare, solar grants & public-sector strikes
    20:08 Trade unions: spending demands & who pays
    24:54 Should higher public-sector pay mean more productivity?
    25:52 IPAS in Durrow: planning & community concerns
    30:36 IPAS spending, larger centres & homeless accommodation
    32:28 Sentencing, free speech & equal treatment
    37:37 Ruth Coppinger’s bill: “X” markers & birth certificates
    43:33 Gender recognition & the wider legal debate
    45:52 Academia, NGOs & family policy
    48:15 Britain’s war warnings, Ukraine & diplomacy
    52:31 Mary Robinson, Greta Thunberg & climate politics
    55:16 Nick’s case for cheaper energy
    57:05 Leo Varadkar: solutions from the sidelines?
    59:00 NBC’s Today show comes to Kenmare
    1:00:41 Final thoughts & goodbye

    #TheIrishQuestion #IrishPolitics #Ireland

    Mon, 19 Oct 2026 - 1h 02min
Mostrar mais episódios